I just want to beat an opponent straight up, not because they are weak. I mean a win is a win, but I'd prefer if it actually meant something.

---

You are lonely. Nice avatar. I love spongebob, too!

---

What you smoking on today?

---

I'd rather have Luck play, if we win I'm sure the story will be he wasn't 100% but who cares.  If you beat the colts with Hasselbeck it doesn't prove much, if you lose to Hasselbeck....hello Wells Fargo building.

---

What you smoking on today?

Cheddar cheese breh. U?

---

Don't care who they start. It's a must win.


With that said, I prefer to have the best chance to win. If that means an injured luck, fine. If that means an aging back up, great.


We just need to win.


This concept of playing against there best guys is great if we were also at 100 percent. We're not.


If we had marks, fowler, Lee, and JT in the roster, then great, bring on a healthy luck and I like our chances.


That's not the case, is it?

---

I just want to beat an opponent straight up, not because they are weak. I mean a win is a win, but I'd prefer if it actually meant something.

 

So the Jaguar loses don't really mean anything because a number of starters (real or potential) are injured? We should see the Jags as 3-0?

---

The sun's not yellow, it's chicken.

Yes. I just want to win.

---

Probably. I think the pack has left the loner to wander and ponder

---

You Gotta Be Able To Run Da' Rock~

Yes.

---

Peyton Manning won his Super Bowl by going through a plethora of hurt teams in the playoffs. I could care less if every other team is full strengthen or not a win is a win.



We have to win with our injuries so other teams should be put on that expectation too.

---

Any win at the defending division champs home turf while they are desperate AND would give us 1st in the division is a win I'll gladly take.

 

 

A win is a win.  Colts are facing adversity and we've seen backup QBs light up our defense before, whoever lines up we must be ready to put it ALL out.  A blow out is simply unacceptable is grounds for termination (Gus).

---

I just want to beat an opponent straight up, not because they are weak. I mean a win is a win, but I'd prefer if it actually meant something.

 

We already did that in week 2.

 

I personally want Luck to start only because he is my opponent's QB this week in fantasy football and I see us getting some turnovers.

 

Regarding the game, I have us pegged for a win regardless who they start at QB.  It's going to happen.

---

There are 10 kinds of people in this world.  Those who understand binary and those who don't.

Right now, I'll just take some wins lol

 

GO JAGS!!

---

Let's Get Em!!!! Go Jags!

We got Brady through a reversal of fortune.  No Luck would right the karmic flow.

---

Win is a win. We played the Patriots with a practice squad CB starting at FS for the 1st time in his life but no one cares or even mentions it. They only care about the final score.

---

I want to win. I don't care who plays. However, I understand your point. I too would like to see how we matchup against a divisional opponent like the colts.

---

I'd rather have Luck play, if we win I'm sure the story will be he wasn't 100% but who cares.  If you beat the colts with Hasselbeck it doesn't prove much, if you lose to Hasselbeck....hello Wells Fargo building.

 

No, people will say it is a continuation of Luck's struggles. He has been bad all year.

---

I wonder if anyone playing us wishes the Jags were at full strength? 

 

 

Of course not - the NFL is about winning, and a win is a win.  Injuries are a part of the game.  One guy goes down, the next man gets his shot.  

 

 

---

I don't care if he plays or not, I want a win.

---

I'm condescending. That means I talk down to you.