Create Account



The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Oklahoma girl, 13, reportedly named brothers as assailants who fatally stabbed parents, 3 sibilngs

#1

Wonder if Obama will call for stricter Knife Laws

 

 


Oklahoma girl, 13, reportedly named brothers as assailants who fatally stabbed parents, 3 siblings
 

An arrest reports states that the brothers accused of killing their parents and three siblings inside an Oklahoma home were fingered as the killers by their 13-year-old sister who survived the horrific attack, the Tulsa World reported Saturday.

 

 

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2015/07/25/okl...tcmp=hpbt1


[Image: review.jpg]
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#2
(This post was last modified: 07-25-2015, 11:31 AM by The Eleventh Doctor.)

As a knife and sword collector, I'd have no problem with laws regulating knives if politicians felt that it would save lives.  I certainly am not going to complain about not being able to carry my knives or swords in public.  Of course, I keep all of my knives (except kitchen utensils, which obviously serve a purpose outside of stabbing someone) and swords locked up safely because I have five kids in the house who, if they were to ever get a hold of one someone could get hurt. 


For example, Switchblade Knives are illegal.  I'm perfectly okay with that as a knife enthusiast.


I was wrong about Trent Baalke. 
Reply

#3

Just don't bring a knife to a gun fight.

 

And don't trust your sister.


If something can corrupt you, you're corrupted already.
- Bob Marley

[Image: kiWL4mF.jpg]
 
Reply

#4

That mugshot in the story:

 

"Harry Potter" meets "Deliverance"


Reply

#5

Quote:As a knife and sword collector, I'd have no problem with laws regulating knives if politicians felt that it would save lives.  I certainly am not going to complain about not being able to carry my knives or swords in public.  Of course, I keep all of my knives (except kitchen utensils, which obviously serve a purpose outside of stabbing someone) and swords locked up safely because I have five kids in the house who, if they were to ever get a hold of one someone could get hurt. 

For example, Switchblade Knives are illegal.  I'm perfectly okay with that as a knife enthusiast.
 

A couple of questions for you.

 

First of all, why is it that Switchblade Knives are illegal?

 

Second, would you support regulation that banned all knives except for those specifically designated as kitchen utensils?  Is there such a thing as an "assault knife"?

 

I'm really interested in hearing your answers just to get some perspective.



There are 10 kinds of people in this world.  Those who understand binary and those who don't.
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#6
(This post was last modified: 07-25-2015, 04:55 PM by The Eleventh Doctor.)

Quote:A couple of questions for you.

 

First of all, why is it that Switchblade Knives are illegal?

 

Second, would you support regulation that banned all knives except for those specifically designated as kitchen utensils?  Is there such a thing as an "assault knife"?

 

I'm really interested in hearing your answers just to get some perspective.
 

As far as I can tell the switchblade was banned in most places because it was considered being designed for violence.  It was before my time they were banned.


I'd be okay with a regulation that banned all knives except those specially designed as kitchen utensils if it was thought that it could save lives.  I'd prefer legislation requiring licensure or something like that.  Which is actually what I'd prefer with guns, but I know the idea of gun licenses is one most pro-gun people oppose.  Of course like I said, I keep my weapons locked up safely in the first place.  Knives are certainly not toys, and while I know my children know that I don't want to take the risk.   If knife attacks were frequent, I'd certainly understand the call for their banning or stricter regulation.  I'd hate to lose some of my knives, because they were given to me by my uncle.  Most of them aren't worth a whole lot, of course.  Mostly it's sentimental value plus personal interest in knives and swords.  Some of which I gained interest in when a blacksmith came to our college.  


I mean knives are a significant killer.  Not quite the same level as firearms, but the murder rate is still pretty up there.  


I was wrong about Trent Baalke. 
Reply

#7

Quote:As far as I can tell the switchblade was banned in most places because it was considered being designed for violence.  It was before my time they were banned.


I'd be okay with a regulation that banned all knives except those specially designed as kitchen utensils if it was thought that it could save lives.  I'd prefer legislation requiring licensure or something like that.  Which is actually what I'd prefer with guns, but I know the idea of gun licenses is one most pro-gun people oppose.  Of course like I said, I keep my weapons locked up safely in the first place.  Knives are certainly not toys, and while I know my children know that I don't want to take the risk.   If knife attacks were frequent, I'd certainly understand the call for their banning or stricter regulation.  I'd hate to lose some of my knives, because they were given to me by my uncle.  Most of them aren't worth a whole lot, of course.  Mostly it's sentimental value plus personal interest in knives and swords.  Some of which I gained interest in when a blacksmith came to our college.  


I mean knives are a significant killer.  Not quite the same level as firearms, but the murder rate is still pretty up there.  
 

I would counter that a Switchblade Knife was designed for quickness and convenience, not necessarily for violence.  They got a "stigma" back in the 1950's as they were used a lot by violent gang members and mafia types.  However, think about this.  A common "pocket knife" can be deployed almost as rapidly as a Switchblade Knife.  I know that my own personal knife that I carry can be opened with one hand and a flick of my wrist.  The Switchblade Knife was considered in the 1950's what some consider an "assault weapon" today with regards to guns.

 

I feel bad for you in some ways.  I have a pretty good gun collection, some of them being given to me by ancestors and have been passed down through several generations (I'm the fourth generation by the way).  Those particular guns as well as some others are kept in a safe, much like your knife and sword collection, but a couple of my firearms are kept close by, many times on my hip.  I would NEVER be okay with government forcing me to give up a single one of my firearms.  The same as you, some of my firearms have more sentimental value than anything else, and there are even some that I would not attempt to fire because I'm not clear about the safety of doing so.

 

I'll let you in on a little secret.  A police officer fears a knife more (in close proximity) than a gun.  Kevlar will stop a bullet from a hand gun, but it won't stop a blade. 



There are 10 kinds of people in this world.  Those who understand binary and those who don't.
Reply

#8

Quote:I would counter that a Switchblade Knife was designed for quickness and convenience, not necessarily for violence.  They got a "stigma" back in the 1950's as they were used a lot by violent gang members and mafia types.  However, think about this.  A common "pocket knife" can be deployed almost as rapidly as a Switchblade Knife.  I know that my own personal knife that I carry can be opened with one hand and a flick of my wrist.  The Switchblade Knife was considered in the 1950's what some consider an "assault weapon" today with regards to guns.

 

I feel bad for you in some ways.  I have a pretty good gun collection, some of them being given to me by ancestors and have been passed down through several generations (I'm the fourth generation by the way).  Those particular guns as well as some others are kept in a safe, much like your knife and sword collection, but a couple of my firearms are kept close by, many times on my hip.  I would NEVER be okay with government forcing me to give up a single one of my firearms.  The same as you, some of my firearms have more sentimental value than anything else, and there are even some that I would not attempt to fire because I'm not clear about the safety of doing so.

 

I'll let you in on a little secret.  A police officer fears a knife more (in close proximity) than a gun.  Kevlar will stop a bullet from a hand gun, but it won't stop a blade. 
 

How close are you talking?

Reply

#9

Quote:How close are you talking?
 

I would say within a few yards.



There are 10 kinds of people in this world.  Those who understand binary and those who don't.
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!





Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.


ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!