10-05-2014, 08:44 PM
Don't forget Joeckel was stinking it up at RT and we where told we had to switch him to his natural position ( fighting the scheme better then Monroe anyways) at LT.
Quote:
I personally think that a few of you demonizing Caldwell will be ready to erect a shrine to the guy when half of those ^ guys turn out to be above average starters.
Quote:Don't forget Joeckel was stinking it up at RT and we where told we had to switch him to his natural position ( fighting the scheme better then Monroe anyways) at LT.
Quote:Possibly, but will you be ready to drop bradley and the coaching staff if the players you mention do not continue to progress? yes I will
Joeckel is used to NFL speed from last year. He's in his 5 game as LT and is still making mistakes. You must realize that have unrealistic expectations here. Drafting a LT high doesn't guarantee he's an all-pro after 5 starts. It doesn't mean he sucks if it takes longer either. I'm giving him till NEXT October to prove it - and I bet he does it by December.
Shoelace made a nice catch as a WR, but hasn't really gotten off the floor in terms of running the rock. He's only had a meaningful number of carries in one game. Yu should be looking at the O-line here, and not Denard anyway IMO.
Hurns is still making the same mistakes, granted he's a rookie, I'm not even being critical of him..
I'm just saying at some point one group of fans will be right, and one won't. We'll see. I just don't want to start over again. Ugh
I just don't like where this whole thing is going. And I'm not even sure it's Bradley's issue so much as the fact that he hired coordinators that seem to be the bottom of the barrel… I'm not sold on Babich. Not at all. Sick of this soft zone
I'm being critical here, but I actually thought we played the best we have all year.
Quote:and is that a bad thing?It's not a bad thing - but it makes you look like an absolute chump if you are blaming losses on him now.
I'll be ready to name the stadium after him if he makes us consistent contenders and wins us a superbowl.
Quote:I've been rewatching the game and Joeckel sucks. He whiffed on multiple plays, he got blown up and put on his keester on another and seems lost on others. The dude isn't playing like a #2 overall pick.
Quote:When we hired Caldwell the plan was clear a total rebuild. Tear it all down, design a scheme, build a team around the scheme. Didn't matter if some players here where serviceable we where going to a zone blocking team on offense and a hybrid team on defense. Two years later and we are failing on both fronts miserably.I don't think that any of the players here honestly feel motivated to play in Jacksonville, and thus that's why our team is so horrible overall. You can't have a "team" if everyone is not motivated and on the same page. Plain and simple.
Maybe the problems not coaching or talent but an insistsnce on only bringing in players for a specific scheme. Why don't we or haven't we simply brought in talent and developed schemes around who we have.
To me the problem is at the top, that's Caldwell. It's not popular to say but who else is responsible for building this roster? Are we passing up talent because it doesn't fit out scheme? That's simply a luxury we can't afford. It also feels like a backwards way to go about building a franchise.
Quote:
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="The_Anchorman" data-cid="317258" data-time="1412556093">
<div>
Possibly, but will you be ready to drop bradley and the coaching staff if the players you mention do not continue to progress? yes I will
Joeckel is used to NFL speed from last year. He's in his 5 game as LT and is still making mistakes. You must realize that have unrealistic expectations here. Drafting a LT high doesn't guarantee he's an all-pro after 5 starts. It doesn't mean he sucks if it takes longer either. I'm giving him till NEXT October to prove it - and I bet he does it by December.
Shoelace made a nice catch as a WR, but hasn't really gotten off the floor in terms of running the rock. He's only had a meaningful number of carries in one game. Yu should be looking at the O-line here, and not Denard anyway IMO.
Hurns is still making the same mistakes, granted he's a rookie, I'm not even being critical of him..
I'm just saying at some point one group of fans will be right, and one won't. We'll see. I just don't want to start over again. Ugh
I just don't like where this whole thing is going. And I'm not even sure it's Bradley's issue so much as the fact that he hired coordinators that seem to be the bottom of the barrel… I'm not sold on Babich. Not at all. Sick of this soft zone
I'm being critical here, but I actually thought we played the best we have all year.
Quote:I thin khans done everything you could ask for in an owner and more. Maybe David's the right guy maybe not but I can't fault him for trying. Now if we'd stuck with gene for another year or more.....
Quote:That's why I don't think an offensive lineman should ever be taken in the top 5.
Even if they're good, they don't make that big of an impact. Give me 5 Austin Pasztor's and you can make a solid offensive line around which you can run any offense.
Quote:I hear ya'.
I just want to see continued progress. Heck, we didn't get blown out this week. We may as well take that as a win.
But with that said, there are things I want to see get better, faster....
Quote:I hear ya'.
For the sake of "we're getting closer" perspective: You know what would have sealed a victory for the Jags today IMO?
A year of NFL experience for Blake and an above average free safety. Those aren't our only needs, but I think that would have done it. Those two things take away a pick 6 by Bortles and 3 big plays from the Steelers. Maybe even adding a pick for the Jags.
Quote:This team is 5-17 in the past 2 years.
I dunno if we win more than a game or two all year. It is troublesome to see how far off this team is after 2 offseasons.
Quote:
I'll have to keep my eye more on our FS situation next week.
Quote:I had to watch the game on my dvr. Took the family to the zoo today so I didn't see the game live. Watching it on the dvr it becomes painful the blown coverage by the line.
That's when I started thinking about why we assembled this line and how horrible it is. We've insisted on this zone blocking scheme is it a reason why maybe we've brought in lesser talent to fit a sheme? Did we really think this group was the most talented collection of linemen available?