09-18-2014, 05:54 PM
Normally I'm not for the boo birds, and I honestly don't have anything against Chad Henne, but this needs to happen. The message needs to be sent that this isn't acceptable at all.
Quote:I was told this morning to expect him to be on the field running the offense from under center for the Steelers game.
Quote:He's average for a QB of the 80s or 90s. When 3000 yards and a passer rating in the mid 70s was considered acceptable.
Of course back then he'd be even worse because he wouldn't have a league that emphasizes passing trying to prop up every QB's stats.
For the modern NFL goes he's not average, he's bottom of the league as starting QBs go.
Quote:Henne just needs to have a better game vs. Indy because the team needs him to. Not because he needs to validate anything, because everyone including Henne recognizes what his role is on this roster, and he definitely knows the clock is ticking on his tenure as the starting QB. If he is able to play well, it helps with developing the other young talent on the offense, and that's critical.what he said...
Quote:Will we see Bortles in the second half. I have a feeling there will be loud booing at the half if he plays as he has
Quote:1 - The Colts are without their elite pass rusher. In theory this should give Chad more time to throw the football and more time to assess the field which for large parts of the game against the Redskins didn't happen due to a mixture of him being poor and the O-line deciding not to turn up.
2 - Gus has already told him, the team, the fans and the media that Henne will start. That quickly distinguished any doubt he wouldn't play and he has to repay the faith shown in him by our HC.
3 - He simply has to convince us (the fans), that he is worth his place in the team ahead of Bortles. Already, people are calling for Blake to start but, personally, I believe these calls are premature.
His 2014 stats so far:
http://www.nfl.com/player/chadhenne/252/profile
Now, if we ignore those sacks in week 2 in which, let's be honest, the majority of them he hardly had time to grip the ball, bar 2/3, he's not played that badly (in fact his QB rating is higher than Brady atm and isn't far off the likes of Kaepernick, Flacco, etc), epsecially when you consider that pass early on in the game against the Redskins to Hurns who, if had been a veteran WR, would've caught and set us up nicely for a TD or at least a FG and that would've given the whole team more confidence.
That brings me on to my next point, he hasn't got an experienced WR to throw to until Shorts comes back. If he had, say, Megatron down the field he wouldn't be afraid to launch a few passes in his general direction, but, unfortunately for us, he hasn't.
Finally, I'd like to say that this is my opinion of which I know many do not share and also that if Henne performs badly on a consistent basis then I'm all for starting Borltles but for now, let's not get too impatient.
Quote:If all teams where equal and the QBs where the only difference between teams I would agree with you. The teams Henne has been on in his career have been awful. Also, although people tend to hate to extrapolate he's on course for about 3700 yards. Not great, but not horrible either. Please stop the campaigning madness.
Quote:What I can't wait for is when Bortles does get on the field. If he completely lights it up are these Henne people going to try to point to reasons to why it wasn't about Bortles being the better QB?
You can't justify Henne over Bortles as far as performance goes. The only reason you can justify it is because of fear. They're afraid of Bortles being weak in the face of adversity. They're afraid of breaking him under bad circumstances. If you're afraid to take the shot, then you shouldn't be the shooter.
Quote:You're working way too hard to justify the guy. He's bad. The QB is the #1 criteria that separates the quality of teams in the NFL. Recall the colts just a few years ago?
Henne got beat out by Matt Moore down in Miami, a career backup level guy who easily outperformed Henne.
It's not that Henne has only played for bad teams, it's that Henne can't make a team look better than bad.
That you, FBT, and so many others just don't get this, or aren't willing to admit to yourself is something I find disturbing.
The only thing worse than being misinformed is being informed and still choosing to be ignorant.
Quote:I haven't read this whole thread... But in regards to Henne, it seemed in the pre-season we ran a much more up-tempo offense, even going no-huddle in series. What happened to that?
Quote:Now they are trying to give their own defense a chance to breathe. You generally start the up-tempo after getting at least one first down - or establishing some ability to run. We haven't really been in a good situation to run the hurry-up yet.
Quote:Look... I don't care who starts at quarterback. We can start whistlers mother for all it matters to me! What matters isn't who's playing where...what matters is the final score (aka-winning). Somebody just needs to get out there and make enough good plays so we get a W instead of a L for a change.... it doesn't even matter if we win 'ugly' or get un-naturally lucky... we just need a win to help get us back on track....
Quote:Now they are trying to give their own defense a chance to breathe. You generally start the up-tempo after getting at least one first down - or establishing some ability to run. We haven't really been in a good situation to run the hurry-up yet.
Quote:Exactly. Horrible play calling.I didn't say anything about play calling. I was referring to the offenses inability to get first downs or run the ball.
Quote:I didn't say anything about play calling. I was referring to the offenses inability to get first downs or run the ball.