Quote:Wut?
Is there any part that you understood or do I have to explain it all to you?
Quote:Is there any part that you understood or do I have to explain it all to you?
Why draft a less talented football player? You can try to answer that question first.
Jungle Cat is trying to sell ice cubes to Eskimos
Quote:Why draft a less talented football player? You can try to answer that question first.
So if Blake Bortles ends up being the 21st best player according to NFL.com, does that mean Green Bay should take him?
Quote:So if Blake Bortles ends up being the 21st best player according to NFL.com, does that mean Green Bay should take him?
If he is the best available player when they're on the clock, yes.
Quote:Why draft a less talented football player? You can try to answer that question first.
Because the slightly less talented player at a weak position will have a greater impact on the team than the more talented player at a position that is already strong
Quote:If he is the best available player when they're on the clock, yes.
I'm sure Green Bay fans would be thrilled with your choice
.gif "Laughing")
Quote:I'm sure Green Bay fans would be thrilled with your choice
Just like last time they drafted a QB who fell in the first round when they already had one...
Quote:I don't think we need two QBs.
I think it's better to take 2 incase one doesn't work out..
Quote:Just like last time they drafted a QB who fell in the first round when they already had one...
I'm sure they were also in the market to start looking for the qb of the future.
Brett Favre turned 36 years old early into Aaron Rodgers rookie season.
Aaron Rodgers just turned 31.
They have a couple more years
Quote:So if Blake Bortles ends up being the 21st best player according to NFL.com, does that mean Green Bay should take him?
Sure why not? Beats phoning the guy on the tractor, right?
Quote:Because the slightly less talented player at a weak position will have a greater impact on the team than the more talented player at a position that is already strong
How did you get so untalented? :ph34r:
Quote:Sure why not? Beats phoning the guy on the tractor, right?
So if the top ranked player of every round this year is a Left Tackle, we should just take 7 Left Tackles? And then next year the highest ranked player is a left tackle too. All 7 rounds. We'd then have 14 left tackles.
Quote:So if the top ranked player of every round this year is a Left Tackle, we should just take 7 Left Tackles? And then next year the highest ranked player is a left tackle too. All 7 rounds. We'd then have 14 left tackles.
Phase 1- collect left tackles
Phase 2- ?
Phase 3- profit
Quote:So if the top ranked player of every round this year is a Left Tackle, we should just take 7 Left Tackles? And then next year the highest ranked player is a left tackle too. All 7 rounds. We'd then have 14 left tackles.
If you've got 'em all somebody else doesn't. They know were to call.
Quote:If you've got 'em all somebody else doesn't. They know were to call.
Or until preseason is over and you have to cut a bunch of them...
Quote:If you've got 'em all somebody else doesn't. They know were to call.
How did that strategy work out for you last season in fantasy football?
Quote:Or until preseason is over and you have to cut a bunch of them...
Or we draft a left handed QB