Jacksonville Jaguars Fan Forums

Full Version: Browns Were Willing To Trade A 2Nd Rounder For Monroe Per La Confora
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6
Quote:I have been looking at threads for a few minutes. I have seen you call people dummy, sheep, lemmings, neanderthals. What insults am I missing? It doesn't make you appear to be very interested in having an intelligent conversation.
You're right...it's really hard to argue with people oblivious to the fact and under the influence of pharmaceuticals.
Ryan O is the best beat writer the Jags have had in a long time.

 

La Canfora goes out of his way regularly to bash the Jags and make up stories about them moving or rumors about Tebow or anything else he can come up with. He has written articles long ago about how he openly hates Jax for getting the Jags when he wanted his hometown Baltimore to get the expansion team.

 

One says there is no truth to the second day pick rumors, the other says a couple teams did. Y'all are free to choose whichever you want, I am sure as hell not going to believe JLC over connected and unbiased  Ryan O though.

Quote:Ryan O is the best beat writer the Jags have had in a long time.
 

Since Prisco. He's good.
It's worrisome if it's true.  No way to really know at this point.  

Quote:You're part of the lemming crew silly.


I could flip the script and apply this statement to my point. Talk about hypocrisy.


Tell me this, what's the incentive of giving Monroe away for nothing and not waiting it out to see what comes to fruition?
You're just not terribly smart, are you?


Do you know what hypocrisy means? Not sure how saying nobody knows for sure whether the Monroe deal is a good one or not as of right now is hypocritical. I really think you just used the word because it had a lot of syllables in it.


I'm pretty sure we didn't give Monroe away for nothing, but I have an IQ that exceeds my show size, so I recognize the fact that we for a 4th and 5th for him. A rumor that Cleveland was willing to give up one pick in the third round only excites those who don't have a clue. It's impossible for you to fathom the possibity that the rumor is false, despite the fact that the guy covering this team says it's bogus.


We got two picks for Monroe. We don't know how these picks will be used. More than likely they'll wind up being bundled and traded, and depending on what we get in the end, it may turn out that trading Monroe for two picks winds up being a good thing. Again, none of us know at this point, but somehow this logic confuses you.


FYI. Might want to buy a dictionary.
I have a hard time believe any reports after the fact that someone wanted to pay more. I think the market was set for Monroe at what we got, the problem I have is pulling the trigger on the trade if that's market value. I'd rather keep the two tackles going forward.......

Quote:I have a hard time believe any reports after the fact that someone wanted to pay more. I think the market was set for Monroe at what we got, the problem I have is pulling the trigger on the trade if that's market value. I'd rather keep the two tackles going forward.......
I agree.  If you get a better offer later cool, if you don't then you have 2 good tackles....it's not a negative especially if you have the cap space. Which we do....it sad that I have to clarify that....
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6