Jacksonville Jaguars Fan Forums

Full Version: The Future Quarterback - I think it's Bortles
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
(11-17-2017, 09:05 AM)Upper Wrote: [ -> ]
(11-17-2017, 09:02 AM)flsprtsgod Wrote: [ -> ]Lol, yeah, let's go grab another one off the qb tree. The grass isn't always greener you know.

Double down this time though. Get a 1st round pick QB, and then back it up with Tyrod or the guy that loses the Bridgewater/Keenum battle for a reasonable price.

Bortles is a 1st round QB, Tyrod just lost his job to a rookie, and Keenum has had a handful of good games in a row so that has more weight than his very below average career?  This is my point.  How would this scenario be any better?
(11-17-2017, 08:47 AM)RealJagsFan Wrote: [ -> ]
(11-16-2017, 11:35 PM)Upper Wrote: [ -> ]The bar is just set so damn low if the fans and staff are saying what Bortles has done this year has been "incredibly well" or "very well, very, very well".

By the best measures he's been average so just use those words. And again, average is fine while he's cheap, but he's not going to be cheap going forward. He can stay on the 5th year option since we have so much rollover cap left, but he can't stay on with a long term deal. That would be just as bad as the also unwise deals given out to Dalton/Schaub/Garrard/etc.

I agree with this. It's just been so long since we've had a competent passer that most fans don't even know what that looks like. I was stunned that they did nothing to address the QB situation this past offseason. To do it again will be the greatest failure in NFL history. It would be a complete waste of a super talented roster. It is well known that he is our achilles. I guess everyone knows it but us. We will continue to see 8 or 9 in the box, completely stifling our running game because they know that Blake can't truly punish them for it. One drive a game will not make defenses change that up.

To do it again would be the greatest failure in NFL history???  C'mon, man.  I don't mind hyperbole, but that's too much.
(11-17-2017, 09:18 AM)Jagzfanfromiowa Wrote: [ -> ]
(11-17-2017, 09:05 AM)Upper Wrote: [ -> ]Double down this time though. Get a 1st round pick QB, and then back it up with Tyrod or the guy that loses the Bridgewater/Keenum battle for a reasonable price.

Bortles is a 1st round QB, Tyrod just lost his job to a rookie, and Keenum has had a handful of good games in a row so that has more weight than his very below average career?  This is my point.  How would this scenario be any better?
19 million for a guy who will throw 20 TDs this season while still throwing double digit interceptions. There is still plenty of football left but I don't think Blake is turn into something he's not.

Don't get me wrong though. He's playing better than I thought he would this year but when has Blake had to win a game for us? The Jets game? Failed. Rams game? Failed. Chargers game? Failed miserably.

This offense is built to limit mistakes and a lot of QBs could do what Blake is doing in this offense.
(11-17-2017, 09:18 AM)Jagzfanfromiowa Wrote: [ -> ]Bortles is a 1st round QB, Tyrod just lost his job to a rookie, and Keenum has had a handful of good games in a row so that has more weight than his very below average career?  This is my point.  How would this scenario be any better?

1. Draft stock means nothing 4 years down the road.
2. The Bills are idiots who have made idiotic moves all year, including this one. Imagine if we used the logic that Dareus lost his job to an undrafted 2nd year player so he must suck and we can't use him.
3. Keenum this season is playing way better than Bortles ever has in his career, and he's doing it in virtually the exact system that we want to run here. He would be a plug and play upgrade from week 1 that could hold us over until the rookie is ready or maybe even longer.
(11-17-2017, 09:02 AM)flsprtsgod Wrote: [ -> ]
(11-17-2017, 08:47 AM)RealJagsFan Wrote: [ -> ]I agree with this. It's just been so long since we've had a competent passer that most fans don't even know what that looks like. I was stunned that they did nothing to address the QB situation this past offseason. To do it again will be the greatest failure in NFL history. It would be a complete waste of a super talented roster. It is well known that he is our achilles. I guess everyone knows it but us. We will continue to see 8 or 9 in the box, completely stifling our running game because they know that Blake can't truly punish them for it. One drive a game will not make defenses change that up.

Lol, yeah, let's go grab another one off the qb tree. The grass isn't always greener you know.

Or lets just keep running into that brick wall. Wallbash The offseason is meant to attempt improvement. All teams attempt it. To not try because it's hard is asinine. Especially if you believe this overall roster is currently championship caliber.
(11-17-2017, 09:19 AM)The Real Marty Wrote: [ -> ]
(11-17-2017, 08:47 AM)RealJagsFan Wrote: [ -> ]I agree with this. It's just been so long since we've had a competent passer that most fans don't even know what that looks like. I was stunned that they did nothing to address the QB situation this past offseason. To do it again will be the greatest failure in NFL history. It would be a complete waste of a super talented roster. It is well known that he is our achilles. I guess everyone knows it but us. We will continue to see 8 or 9 in the box, completely stifling our running game because they know that Blake can't truly punish them for it. One drive a game will not make defenses change that up.

To do it again would be the greatest failure in NFL history???  C'mon, man.  I don't mind hyperbole, but that's too much.

OK, not as bad as the Bills losing 5 Super Bowls but at least they got there. You're crazy if you think this won't be talked about years from now if this team maintains it's current defensive status and dominant running game for the next say 3 years but fails to get to a championship because they keep believing Blake will turn the corner. I mean for gods sake after last offseason we actually left ourselves in a position of Blake or bust even after he was coming off a his worst season ever. Who does that?  This may sound like more "hyperbole" but I honestly believe that due to the current status of the AFC, this is our year to make it to the Super Bowl. I also feel that if it doesn't happen it will be primarily due to Blake.
Bortles is the most durable QB in the NFL. He's taken a beating his whole Jags career with a terrible OL which this year is now average. Coughlin will draft 3-4 OL this offseason next to Cam Robinson and start building up the lines for Blake and Fournette.
Bortles ain't the future. Baker Mayfield is.
(11-17-2017, 09:27 AM)Cleatwood Wrote: [ -> ]
(11-17-2017, 09:18 AM)Jagzfanfromiowa Wrote: [ -> ]Bortles is a 1st round QB, Tyrod just lost his job to a rookie, and Keenum has had a handful of good games in a row so that has more weight than his very below average career?  This is my point.  How would this scenario be any better?
19 million for a guy who will throw 20 TDs this season while still throwing double digit interceptions. There is still plenty of football left but I don't think Blake is turn into something he's not.

Don't get me wrong though. He's playing better than I thought he would this year but when has Blake had to win a game for us? The Jets game? Failed. Rams game? Failed. Chargers game? Failed miserably.

This offense is built to limit mistakes and a lot of QBs could do what Blake is doing in this offense.

 
 Now you only cherry pick TD passes with the NFL's worst WRs?! haha how convenient. So you hate Bortles when he's a gun slinger and tossing 35 TDs and 4500 yards and losing and you hate Bortles when he's a game manager tossing 20 TDs and 3200 yards but WINNING. Sounds like a typical Jags fan that doesn't have a clue. Then again this is a fan base that actually thought Brandon Allen or Chad Henne was better than Bortles. 

Bottom line....Tom Coughlin and Doug Marrone know what they're doing. Bortles is the long term answer along with 3 more good OL and 2 more WRs/offensive weapons.

(11-17-2017, 09:33 AM)Upper Wrote: [ -> ]
(11-17-2017, 09:18 AM)Jagzfanfromiowa Wrote: [ -> ]Bortles is a 1st round QB, Tyrod just lost his job to a rookie, and Keenum has had a handful of good games in a row so that has more weight than his very below average career?  This is my point.  How would this scenario be any better?


3. Keenum this season is playing way better than Bortles ever has in his career


 bahahahaha.....and what happens when noodle arm Keenum reverts back to his career average of a CFL QB? Some of your fans/keyboard warriors just pick ONE random QB doing well in ONE season and say it's an upgrade. 

 It's not.
(11-17-2017, 10:09 AM)spacecoastjag Wrote: [ -> ]
(11-17-2017, 09:27 AM)Cleatwood Wrote: [ -> ]19 million for a guy who will throw 20 TDs this season while still throwing double digit interceptions. There is still plenty of football left but I don't think Blake is turn into something he's not.

Don't get me wrong though. He's playing better than I thought he would this year but when has Blake had to win a game for us? The Jets game? Failed. Rams game? Failed. Chargers game? Failed miserably.

This offense is built to limit mistakes and a lot of QBs could do what Blake is doing in this offense.

 
 Now you only cherry pick TD passes with the NFL's worst WRs?! haha how convenient. So you hate Bortles when he's a gun slinger and tossing 35 TDs and 4500 yards and losing and you hate Bortles when he's a game manager tossing 20 TDs and 3200 yards but WINNING. Sounds like a typical Jags fan that doesn't have a clue. Then again this is a fan base that actually thought Brandon Allen or Chad Henne was better than Bortles. 

Bottom line....Tom Coughlin and Doug Marrone know what they're doing. Bortles is the long term answer along with 3 more good OL and 2 more WRs/offensive weapons.
lol

I'm not cherry picking anything. When the game is on the line and the Jags need a score late, Blake continually comes up short. The defense has to bail him out. He threw 2 picks in the final 2 minutes and if it wasn't for the best defense in the league, we lose that game.

Blake is an average QB. He is not doing anything spectacular and managing the game. 

I also don't hate Blake. I already said I think he's playing well this season. I also know that the position can be upgraded if certain QBs become available. And again, there is a lot of season left so maybe Blake can lead a couple game winning drives to prove he's the guy.
(11-17-2017, 10:13 AM)Cleatwood Wrote: [ -> ]
(11-17-2017, 10:09 AM)spacecoastjag Wrote: [ -> ] 
 Now you only cherry pick TD passes with the NFL's worst WRs?! haha how convenient. So you hate Bortles when he's a gun slinger and tossing 35 TDs and 4500 yards and losing and you hate Bortles when he's a game manager tossing 20 TDs and 3200 yards but WINNING. Sounds like a typical Jags fan that doesn't have a clue. Then again this is a fan base that actually thought Brandon Allen or Chad Henne was better than Bortles. 

Bottom line....Tom Coughlin and Doug Marrone know what they're doing. Bortles is the long term answer along with 3 more good OL and 2 more WRs/offensive weapons.
lol

I'm not cherry picking anything. When the game is on the line and the Jags need a score late, Blake continually comes up short. 

 Do you watch football? Bortles led the game winning drive vs. the Jets on 3rd and 3 at the Jets 43 yard line and Marquise Lee dropped the game winning FG catch. 

 After 2 INTs, Bortles led a huge drive in OT with scrubs Mickens and Cole at WR which gave us great field position to win it with one stop; which we did.

 
 I don't really care about your opinion because Coughlin, Marrone, and Hackett know differently.
(11-17-2017, 10:16 AM)spacecoastjag Wrote: [ -> ]
(11-17-2017, 10:13 AM)Cleatwood Wrote: [ -> ]lol

I'm not cherry picking anything. When the game is on the line and the Jags need a score late, Blake continually comes up short. 

 Do you watch football? Bortles led the game winning drive vs. the Jets on 3rd and 3 at the Jets 43 yard line and Marquise Lee dropped the game winning FG catch. 

 After 2 INTs, Bortles led a huge drive in OT with scrubs Mickens and Cole at WR which gave us great field position to win it with one stop; which we did.

 
 I don't really care about your opinion because Coughlin, Marrone, and Hackett know differently.
So the answer is no. He has not led a game winning drive.
Bortles may be the near future out of necessity, but he is not this teams longterm future...guaranteed. Not a prototypical Coughlin QB and he seems to be at or near his ceiling.
(11-17-2017, 10:08 AM)JagFanatic24 Wrote: [ -> ]Bortles ain't the future. Baker Mayfield is.

Baker Mayfield will be long gone by the time we pick.
If we keep Blake as our starter of the future, we'll never win a Superbowl. Write it down.
(11-17-2017, 09:18 AM)Jagzfanfromiowa Wrote: [ -> ]
(11-17-2017, 09:05 AM)Upper Wrote: [ -> ]Double down this time though. Get a 1st round pick QB, and then back it up with Tyrod or the guy that loses the Bridgewater/Keenum battle for a reasonable price.

Bortles is a 1st round QB, Tyrod just lost his job to a rookie, and Keenum has had a handful of good games in a row so that has more weight than his very below average career?  This is my point.  How would this scenario be any better?

Funny thing is they are all better than Bortles.

Unbelievable how some people wanna live with a mediocre QB.
God i hope not.
IMO Jags need to draft a QB in at least the first 3 rounds. (this is not counting for any free agency adds)
I've been mulling over the various QB scenarios for 2018 and beyond, and I think I've settled on this:

Pay the ridiculous option figure and draft the next guy. If you're lucky the kid can take over for Bortles after the bye should he be struggling. If Bortles manages to keep it on track you can sit the rookie the whole year and get the playbook engrained.

I'd even be OK with trading up a few spots to accomplish this. As long as you don't sacrifice too many picks.

Of course if Blake melts down to end this season - I'll change my mind on keeping him and prefer a different vet be the gap-bridge until the new kid is ready.
(11-17-2017, 09:33 AM)Upper Wrote: [ -> ]
(11-17-2017, 09:18 AM)Jagzfanfromiowa Wrote: [ -> ]Bortles is a 1st round QB, Tyrod just lost his job to a rookie, and Keenum has had a handful of good games in a row so that has more weight than his very below average career?  This is my point.  How would this scenario be any better?

1. Draft stock means nothing 4 years down the road.
2. The Bills are idiots who have made idiotic moves all year, including this one. Imagine if we used the logic that Dareus lost his job to an undrafted 2nd year player so he must suck and we can't use him.
3. Keenum this season is playing way better than Bortles ever has in his career, and he's doing it in virtually the exact system that we want to run here. He would be a plug and play upgrade from week 1 that could hold us over until the rookie is ready or maybe even longer.

Its safe to say then, you have not watched any Bills games ALL YEAR. If you had you wouldnt be saying this (OR if you watched the 2nd half of the THU game you are giving them way too much credit)
Since this move happed, I've seen a few outlets say JAX would be an excellent landing sport for TT.
While there may be SOME truth to it - its due to your system. TT's biggest issue at this point is he has to find a team willing to find a team willing to build around him. It'll be the difference between making something of his career or being the guy who everyone says ' his next stop is where he figures it out'
With Marrone saying he wants to run all the time etc - I get the impression that its a fit BUT if something happens and theres an O coordinator change who has a different philosophy, he coulf find himself smack dab in the same situation he's in now.
I've seen people on this board clamoring for national props/credit. Buffalo is the same way, the national media lowers the bar and then makes a big deal when they jump over it - like its cute. The flip side is no one really pays attention, actually watches the games in context. You guys seem to be out of this now and people are paying attention to and watching JAX games... which is great. 
Listening to people call the Bills dumb for benching Taylor is kinda funny bc it stems more from a disrespect for the club than the actual situation. No one is fact checking these guys and they keep throwing out stats or more often statements that just arent true (rather just an assumption or reach based on paying minimal attention) but the funny thing is no one outside Buffalo is watching either so no one is there to call em out or even know they are wrong.
Anywho, I'm not a huge Peterman supporter. But the thing is, he's the ANTI-TYROD. His qb rating % and ints are low... but they lead the league in 3 and outs - also technically a turnover. Its gotta be maddening for a OC to game plan and on game day have that plan not work only to review the all 22 and see that in fact it WOULD have worked had the qb just chucked the rock. He has won something like FOUR games when his team gets down by 4 or more points. Not this year - in his career. As a fan its SSSOO frustrating everytime you loose or have a putrid offensive performance to have the other team  (NEVER FAIL) it was easy, all we had to do was make him play QB. I dont wanna ramble on, but essentially they had to be at their wits end. After TT watched every Benjiman reception in the NFL and had a talk with coach how to use him for 50/50 balls and take chances he was target 3x (1 complete, 2 absolute turds) and then avoided him like the plague for the rest of the game. The hate last week was being down 20, and having multiple 3rd and long situations end with a 4-6 yard checkdown. Rick Dennison was asked why they were taking chances and he said he had told him to and he interprited that as check down and see if the guy can make a move for the 1st. Heck, it wasnt until Peterman came in a completed ball traveled over 10 yards!!   Thats bad. I support this move for no other reason than I support not being complacent with 'ok. Our standards have gotten low and TTs supporters always lead with the argument ' well hes the best we've had since Jim Kelly'..... uuuhhhh so? thats not saying a lot! Coach didnt say this was for a 'spark' or to 'evaluate' (surely they could have given him a couple games at the end of the year) but rather to make the team better. It sounds like at some point over the last few weeks the team decided TT was surpassed by Peterman. Hopefully now we get more than 4-6x WR targets in a game and dont have to deal with the 8 man stacked boxes. 
It is telling however than no AFCE teams seem to be clamoring for Taylor. Heck, the Jets have a 38 yr old qb and their fans seem to have seen enough from TT over the last 3 years to know better. 
Maybe at THIS moment in time Taylor would be a better game manager than Bortles - but you dont want him as your future. So Mr Upper, before you criticize a move you dont understand - take the time to consider all sides and just as the National Media hasnt known whats up in JAX or given them their due ( until recently ) I implore you to try and take all points into account prior to making statments like that. Thanks!!
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7