11-11-2019, 03:04 PM
Like I said above ....jobs 1 & 2 is beat the clots and the tacks (again) ....he's the one with all the experience.
Time to walk the talk and start earning the $$$.
Time to walk the talk and start earning the $$$.
(11-11-2019, 02:54 PM)TrivialPursuit Wrote: [ -> ](11-11-2019, 02:46 PM)Rico Wrote: [ -> ]This is just plain stupid.
Saving his job = winning.
If he didn't think he had the best shot of winning, why would he start him? In case you missed it, they blew out the tacks and haven't played the clots yet. They still have a shot at the playoffs, you're going to play who you think can get you there.
Okay.. yay for a mediocre season where we gain nothing, learn nothing and accomplish nothing.
#becausejaguars
(11-11-2019, 03:04 PM)Mowerguy Wrote: [ -> ]Like I said above ....jobs 1 & 2 is beat the clots and the tacks (again) ....he's the one with all the experience.
Time to walk the talk and start earning the $$$.
(11-11-2019, 01:52 PM)TrivialPursuit Wrote: [ -> ](11-11-2019, 01:49 PM)Kane Wrote: [ -> ]People still salty about the coaching staff making the smart decision
Fanboys gonna fan, I guess.
Foles will be the starter unless or until he is injured.
Or perhaps if Minshew looks clearly better next off season.
Time to get over it, kids.
It's to save his job - not for the good of the franchise.
Let's face it - the coach cares about winning now, not what's best 10 years from now when he's not even coaching anymore.
The Jags are worse than the tacks, clots and tinhorns this year. That's just fact... a QB isn't going to change that - so let's see if we need to draft one next year or not.
(11-11-2019, 02:54 PM)TrivialPursuit Wrote: [ -> ](11-11-2019, 02:46 PM)Rico Wrote: [ -> ]This is just plain stupid.
Saving his job = winning.
If he didn't think he had the best shot of winning, why would he start him? In case you missed it, they blew out the tacks and haven't played the clots yet. They still have a shot at the playoffs, you're going to play who you think can get you there.
Okay.. yay for a mediocre season where we gain nothing, learn nothing and accomplish nothing.
#becausejaguars
(11-11-2019, 02:54 PM)TrivialPursuit Wrote: [ -> ](11-11-2019, 02:46 PM)Rico Wrote: [ -> ]This is just plain stupid.
Saving his job = winning.
If he didn't think he had the best shot of winning, why would he start him? In case you missed it, they blew out the tacks and haven't played the clots yet. They still have a shot at the playoffs, you're going to play who you think can get you there.
Okay.. yay for a mediocre season where we gain nothing, learn nothing and accomplish nothing.
#becausejaguars
(11-11-2019, 02:44 PM)NYC4jags Wrote: [ -> ](11-11-2019, 02:31 PM)jagshype Wrote: [ -> ]Will be really interesting to see what the offense looks like and how the players react to Foles' return.
Minshew was good, but there's just so little time to be able to practice and expand the playbook for a rookie QB while game-planning and scheming week in and week out.
Hopefully, Foles gets up to game speed quickly. The run game will be so important these first few games.
4-5 with the vet QB returning, while the team as a whole is getting healthy. Feels like a fresh start to the season, plenty to be optimistic about.
I think we'll see Westbrook and Oliver being targeted in the middle of the field more than we've seen, I think we'll see Conley targeted a bit more on timing routes, and I think we'll see intensified use of Fournette and Armstead on swing passes, wheels, and screens.
I don't have much expectation as to how successful that will or won't be. So hard to know what you're going to get from the O-Line protection, the run game, and the run defense right now. All three of those elements have been inconsistent enough that they could cost you potential victories.
(11-11-2019, 04:01 PM)Ronster Wrote: [ -> ](11-11-2019, 02:44 PM)NYC4jags Wrote: [ -> ]I think we'll see Westbrook and Oliver being targeted in the middle of the field more than we've seen, I think we'll see Conley targeted a bit more on timing routes, and I think we'll see intensified use of Fournette and Armstead on swing passes, wheels, and screens.
I don't have much expectation as to how successful that will or won't be. So hard to know what you're going to get from the O-Line protection, the run game, and the run defense right now. All three of those elements have been inconsistent enough that they could cost you potential victories.
lol, is that what you think? You practically named the whole team. "Um, I think he will throw it to one of the receivers or one of our backs and depending on our o-line it might or might not be successful" Really insightful there buddy.. you really know your stuff, LOL... Good Grief....
(11-11-2019, 04:01 PM)Ronster Wrote: [ -> ](11-11-2019, 02:44 PM)NYC4jags Wrote: [ -> ]I think we'll see Westbrook and Oliver being targeted in the middle of the field more than we've seen, I think we'll see Conley targeted a bit more on timing routes, and I think we'll see intensified use of Fournette and Armstead on swing passes, wheels, and screens.
I don't have much expectation as to how successful that will or won't be. So hard to know what you're going to get from the O-Line protection, the run game, and the run defense right now. All three of those elements have been inconsistent enough that they could cost you potential victories.
lol, is that what you think? You practically named the whole team. "Um, I think he will throw it to one of the receivers or one of our backs and depending on our o-line it might or might not be successful" Really insightful there buddy.. you really know your stuff, LOL... Good Grief....
(11-11-2019, 04:01 PM)Ronster Wrote: [ -> ](11-11-2019, 02:44 PM)NYC4jags Wrote: [ -> ]I think we'll see Westbrook and Oliver being targeted in the middle of the field more than we've seen, I think we'll see Conley targeted a bit more on timing routes, and I think we'll see intensified use of Fournette and Armstead on swing passes, wheels, and screens.
I don't have much expectation as to how successful that will or won't be. So hard to know what you're going to get from the O-Line protection, the run game, and the run defense right now. All three of those elements have been inconsistent enough that they could cost you potential victories.
lol, is that what you think? You practically named the whole team. "Um, I think he will throw it to one of the receivers or one of our backs and depending on our o-line it might or might not be successful" Really insightful there buddy.. you really know your stuff, LOL... Good Grief....
(11-11-2019, 04:02 PM)Kane Wrote: [ -> ]NO!(11-11-2019, 04:01 PM)Ronster Wrote: [ -> ]lol, is that what you think? You practically named the whole team. "Um, I think he will throw it to one of the receivers or one of our backs and depending on our o-line it might or might not be successful" Really insightful there buddy.. you really know your stuff, LOL... Good Grief....
boycott!
He's actually explaining how much of the playbook will be opened up with Foles. As opposed to the very limited play calling we saw with Minshew
which was Chark deep or scramble drill most passing plays
(11-11-2019, 04:01 PM)Ronster Wrote: [ -> ](11-11-2019, 02:44 PM)NYC4jags Wrote: [ -> ]I think we'll see Westbrook and Oliver being targeted in the middle of the field more than we've seen, I think we'll see Conley targeted a bit more on timing routes, and I think we'll see intensified use of Fournette and Armstead on swing passes, wheels, and screens.
I don't have much expectation as to how successful that will or won't be. So hard to know what you're going to get from the O-Line protection, the run game, and the run defense right now. All three of those elements have been inconsistent enough that they could cost you potential victories.
lol, is that what you think? You practically named the whole team. "Um, I think he will throw it to one of the receivers or one of our backs and depending on our o-line it might or might not be successful" Really insightful there buddy.. you really know your stuff, LOL... Good Grief....
(11-12-2019, 10:05 AM)Rico Wrote: [ -> ](11-11-2019, 04:01 PM)Ronster Wrote: [ -> ]lol, is that what you think? You practically named the whole team. "Um, I think he will throw it to one of the receivers or one of our backs and depending on our o-line it might or might not be successful" Really insightful there buddy.. you really know your stuff, LOL... Good Grief....
No wonder you act like you do. You don't know your [BLEEP] from a hole in the ground if that's what you're getting out of it.
(11-12-2019, 06:26 PM)JagNGeorgia Wrote: [ -> ]Minshew's 9 games were mediocre when comparing to a veterans QB. It was historically good for a rookie QB. Obviously, I can't speak for anyone except me, but I'm not interested in starting Minshew because he's better than Foles. I'm interested in starting him because I think he'll be better by next season, and the experience, IMO, is only going to help him get there quicker.
(11-11-2019, 09:12 AM)Cleatwood Wrote: [ -> ](11-10-2019, 01:30 AM)Jags02 Wrote: [ -> ]Notice above how Minshew has more losses this year so far than Foles had in two seasons, Playoffs included, with the Eagles.Good grief.
He's a 6th round rookie who went .500 in his 8 starts.
(11-13-2019, 09:32 AM)Jags02 Wrote: [ -> ]Shocked the Ravens let Flacco walk out the door. I mean he is a SB winning vet after all.(11-11-2019, 09:12 AM)Cleatwood Wrote: [ -> ]Good grief.
He's a 6th round rookie who went .500 in his 8 starts.
It's still part of the decision to start the rookie or the Super Bowl winning vet.
(11-12-2019, 06:26 PM)JagNGeorgia Wrote: [ -> ]Minshew's 9 games were mediocre when comparing to a veterans QB. It was historically good for a rookie QB. Obviously, I can't speak for anyone except me, but I'm not interested in starting Minshew because he's better than Foles. I'm interested in starting him because I think he'll be better by next season, and the experience, IMO, is only going to help him get there quicker.