Quote:Lol you don't think being a member of la raza provided any bias.
Guess you would have been cool with a judge actively apart of the Klan overseeing the OK trial
You're equating an American based domestic terrorist organization with La RAZA? Nice red herring. Do you also think the NAACP are modern day Nazis?
Quote:You're equating an American based domestic terrorist organization with La RAZA? Nice red herring. Do you also think the NAACP are modern day Nazis?
Your inability to see the similarities is quite damning.
Quote:You're equating an American based domestic terrorist organization with La RAZA? Nice red herring. Do you also think the NAACP are modern day Nazis?
Yes, la raza is quite similar, and the NAACP is clearly motivated by race.
Not all la Raza orginizations are one in the same. La raza lawyers association is the latino bar.
People keep bringing up his Federal appointment by Obama, but it started with Republican Arnold.
Trump called him a Mexican numerous times in his interview. That wasn't very bright.
To me insulting a judge that overseeing your case just proves he lacks the ability to work with world leaders (and also super dumb). Hey Turkey we want to use your air space. No, well your mother smells like curry.
Quote:You're equating an American based domestic terrorist organization with La RAZA? Nice red herring. Do you also think the NAACP are modern day Nazis?
La Raza is the modern day Klan. It literally translates "The Race" it's the same propaganda with a different skin color.
Quote:La Raza is the modern day Klan. It literally translates "The Race" it's the same propaganda with a different skin color.
The Klan lynched blacks, burnt down churches and other places of worship, hated Jews and Catholics and sought to purify the American Nation of non whites. They firmly believes in the superiority of the white race.
La Raza isn't even close to being the same as the Klan. Your literal translation of La Raza is a red herring and typical of someone who does not understand the aim of the organization or what they stand for.
Quote:The Klan lynched blacks, burnt down churches and other places of worship, hated Jews and Catholics and sought to purify the American Nation of non whites. They firmly believes in the superiority of the white race.
La Raza isn't even close to being the same as the Klan. Your literal translation of La Raza is a red herring and typical of someone who does not understand the aim of the organization or what they stand for.
I think you need to research la raza a little, they have commited several acts of violence throughout their history and called for racial cleansing of the western united states.
Quote:You're equating an American based domestic terrorist organization with La RAZA? Nice red herring. Do you also think the NAACP are modern day Nazis?
Have you seen what they have been doing lately?
Quote:To me insulting a judge that overseeing your case just proves he lacks the ability to work with world leaders (and also super dumb). Hey Turkey we want to use your air space. No, well your mother smells like curry.
Childish
Quote:The Klan lynched blacks, burnt down churches and other places of worship, hated Jews and Catholics and sought to purify the American Nation of non whites. They firmly believes in the superiority of the white race.
La Raza isn't even close to being the same as the Klan. Your literal translation of La Raza is a red herring and typical of someone who does not understand the aim of the organization or what they stand for.
The return of border states to Mexico? That's borderline insurrection.
If the clan was outside political rallies burning American flags raising swatstikas egging black women and sucker punching Jewish men you woyldnt hear this "overly literal translation" crap.
Come on, guys. Even his own party leaders have rebuked him for the remarks he made about that judge.
Look at it this way. If a judge cannot preside over the trial involving someone who has expressed political opinions he is likely to disagree with, then who can preside over any trial at all? Can a Republican preside over a trial involving a Democrat?
In the case of a presidential candidate and a political ideology pelting people with eggs outside of his events then the idea that there's a potential conflict isn't outrageous.
Quote:In the case of a presidential candidate and a political ideology pelting people with eggs outside of his events then the idea that there's a potential conflict isn't outrageous.
So if a Republican ever commits a crime against a Democrat, then no Republican should be allowed to be the judge in a case involving a Democrat?
Quote:So if a Republican ever commits a crime against a Democrat, then no Republican should be allowed to be the judge in a case involving a Democrat?
Shouldn't a judge be unbiased rather than party affiliated? When a judge is an active, emotionally-invested activist for a cause you are activist against, doesn't that indicate there will be bias?
Did his work with the NAACP disqualify Thurgood Marshall from civil rights cases brought before the SCOTUS?
It's interesting when Trump criticizes the judge, he makes no mention of La Paza, the judge's support of Clinton, or his appointment by Obama. He just says he's Mexican, then follows with his patented variation on "Not that there's anything wrong with that", which is exactly the opposite of why he let's us all know he's Mexican.
Quote:Shouldn't a judge be unbiased rather than party affiliated? When a judge is an active, emotionally-invested activist for a cause you are activist against, doesn't that indicate there will be bias?
Major conflict of interest
Quote:Did his work with the NAACP disqualify Thurgood Marshall from civil rights cases brought before the SCOTUS?
It's interesting when Trump criticizes the judge, he makes no mention of La Paza, the judge's support of Clinton, or his appointment by Obama. He just says he's Mexican, then follows with his patented variation on "Not that there's anything wrong with that", which is exactly the opposite of why he let's us all know he's Mexican.
Marshall wasn't hearing a case about a presidential candidate who will be going up against the person he's invested in. Not really a good comparison.
Trump's positions on the wall and dealing with Mexico was enough to create questions about conflict. I would venture to guess he's well aware of the judge's resume.
Are you really trying to say there's no conflict here, or that this judge isn't politicized? That release of info stunt he pulled and then retracted says otherwise. The resume just presents a motive for doing so.
If this keeps on..and I'm thinking it will...Trump will say quite a few more off the wall things. Some may not agree but his " unpresidential" quips, and tweets is going to be his unraveling. Say what you will , but the calling out the judge because he's Mexican... Well, his parents were...was classic Trump. But it's alienating him, even with his party.
Can't wait to hear what he say about a Muslim that graced most of the newspapers today.
Quote:If this keeps on..and I'm thinking it will...Trump will say quite a few more off the wall things. Some may not agree but his " unpresidential" quips, and tweets is going to be his unraveling. Say what you will , but the calling out the judge because he's Mexican... Well, his parents were...was classic Trump. But it's alienating him, even with his party.
Can't wait to hear what he say about a Muslim that graced most of the newspapers today.
He'll just say what they always say about Obama.