Quote:Wow your stupider than I thought.BBINT is a joke,your the only guy [BLEEP] enough to think it shows disregard to the board/members.
All you've managed to do is to show how much of an idiot you are,unable to decipher even the most simple of statements.
Directly attacking a poster with name calling. Enjoy your ban. I got that it's a joke, as unsophisticated as it was, the long running on here of that name is tired and over used. Like I said keep it up, it makes it easier to point out your thoughtless comments.
Quote:Whilst Carr had a better run game and oline,he also had similar stats with less turnovers,attempts,less weapons,and a harder schedule. Pretty even.
Less attempts, less turnovers. 500 yards less is hardly similar. You're making my point for me. This is fun. Keep going.
If Carr was behind this line the past two years he'd have ended up like his brother. Blake has played with no line, no running game, and no defense and constantly injured receivers the past 2 seasons and still managed to produce.
Quote:If Carr was behind this line the past two years he'd have ended up like his brother. Blake has played with no line, no running game, and no defense and constantly injured receivers the past 2 seasons and still managed to produce.
And yet jackcity thinks we are the stupid ones for knowing this stuff. Lol
Bortles is a beast. Deserves it
A lesser QB under the conditions Blake has played in the past two years would have crumbled a long time ago. See Blaine Gabbert, Christian Ponder, Jake Locker. The fact Blake has not only managed to stay productive, but actually improve under these circumstances is a testament to how good he could be one day.
Well deserved, better upside than carr and just makes bigger plays in general. under rated running with the football.
Quote:Take out Bortles runs
Fair enough.
Jax - 1163 @ 3.85
Oak - 1319 @ 3.91
Still, the overall point was it's negligible at best, and not worth pointing out.
Lets get this straight so there are some on here jumping on the interception bandwagon cause 1) Blake actually made it and 2) he made it higher than carr SMDH. These people have been in football purgatory so long they are in denial. Mind you they want to disregard the fact that carr had a better overall team than Blake. A better offensive line ,better running game, and a better Defense. He didn't even have to be the Brett Farve of his team (equivalent to gunslinger). Mind you the Raiders had 12 rushing TDS last year how much did Jacksonville had in those negligible numbers lmao this is laughable. This must be the same disease that affecting the Allen Hurns ain't that good crowd to. SMDH again at people hating on production.
Quote:A lesser QB under the conditions Blake has played in the past two years would have crumbled a long time ago. See Blaine Gabbert, Christian Ponder, Jake Locker. The fact Blake has not only managed to stay productive, but actually improve under these circumstances is a testament to how good he could be one day.
This. Blake IS already good, and one day = 2016.. Year 3 is usually the leap year for young QBs, not year 2. If Bortles makes another leap in year 3...
How are Bennett and short so high? Like wow talk about disrespect for the non pass rushers
Quote:Wow your stupider than I thought.BBINT is a joke,your the only guy [BLEEP] enough to think it shows disregard to the board/members.
All you've managed to do is to show how much of an idiot you are,unable to decipher even the most simple of statements.
You called him stupid, [BLEEP], and an idiot all in the same post that you use the word "your" instead of "you're".
It's like 1,000 spoons and all you need is a knife.
Our QB is in the top 60 players and this board still finds a way to be toxic.
Quote:Less attempts, less turnovers. 500 yards less is hardly similar. You're making my point for me. This is fun. Keep going.
Considerably tougher schedule. Less attempts=less yards. Again ,pretty even when you consider everything.
Quote:Directly attacking a poster with name calling. Enjoy your ban. I got that it's a joke, as unsophisticated as it was, the long running on here of that name is tired and over used. Like I said keep it up, it makes it easier to point out your thoughtless comments.
It was warranted. Tell me more about how saying BBINT shows a complete disregard for this board/members?
Quote:You called him stupid, [BLEEP], and an idiot all in the same post that you use the word "your" instead of "you're".
It's like 1,000 spoons and all you need is a knife.
Common mistake when I use my phone to type.I give spell check too much lee way.
Well deserved top 100 ranking for Bortles. Carr being good doesn't equal Bortles being bad despite some struggling to separate the two ideas.
Quote:It was warranted. Tell me more about how saying BBINT shows a complete disregard for this board/members?
So you're admitting to attacking me directly? And I'm the stupid one apparently. Haha. Atleast I know how to use the proper "your" and "you're" at the right times. Keep digging that hole.
Quote:Common mistake when I use my phone to type.I give spell check too much lee way.
Having to rely on that spell check huh? I would have said that too except I know how to actually spell without using a computer based function. Leeway is one word, by the way. Guess it missed that one too.
Quote:Considerably tougher schedule. Less attempts=less yards. Again ,pretty even when you consider everything.
Better o-line. Better defense. Still not seeing it.