Jacksonville Jaguars Fan Forums

Full Version: Top 100
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29
Quote:The Jaguars didn't drop Nelson too early. He got plenty of chances here and was horrible. If anything, I think the trade to Cincinnati was a good wake up call for him.
wouldn't say horrible just couldn't tackle he's in every Brandon Marshall highlight ever he was on a terrible defense also who at the time was good an who were the allpros we had rushing the qb if he were still here he'd be terrible he's great with talent around him the Bengals defense is pretty loaded allowed him to be that ed reed type safety I wouldn't say the trade woke him up he just didn't have a wet paper bag surrounding him but like i said i always liked him so I try to stick up for him a lil even wen I'm wrong lol if u watched him he still took terrible angles but u didn't see it as much as u did here cause he wasn't put in a position to fail every single week
Quote:Yep. I mean just over two years ago, the QB depth chart was Henne, Stanzi, Matt Scott
Just reading that list gives me stomach pains
Quote:Wouldn't call it an attack more so than pointing out the obvious. Two can play at that game,you forgot to put a space in between at and least....nice shovel you have there.
Name calling is an attack on this board. Go read the rules again. The only thing obvious is your pathetic attempts at trying to knock me down after you have been made look foolish. Run along troll. While we are at it, not sure if your elementary school you went to taught sentence structure or not but, after a comma is generally a space. That's what the space bar is for. Let's keep going. You're making this way to easy for me.
Quote:Nah just I've gotten so used to using it on my phone I rarely check for mistakes.



Atleast is not one word........"Except I know how to spell without using a computer based function".


Since we are talking about it, are you aware there is also more than one their? They're? There? I bet even for a second you thought I miss used the word except as well? I bet YOU'RE an "Accept" type guy huh?
Quote:Your certainly right about that.
They're their now.... Haha.
Quote:In case you haven't seen the Bortles segment...

 

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000...ndrew-luck
Wesselling's article really comes across as sour grapes.  Oh well. 
Wesselling is an idiot. The list is the top 100 players of 2015, not the top 100 players over the last few years. His logic for both Luck and Dez is how good their stats were for the last couple years. We are only talking about last year, Wes.

 

Also, Luck played 7 games last year and threw 12 picks. Let that sink in for a minute. Luck shouldn't even had been on the list at all if you ask me,

I think Bortles and Carr are close but i do think Bortles takes a step further this year. Probably less yards and TDs but better efficiency, less turnovers and more wins.
Quote:I think Bortles and Carr are close but i do think Bortles takes a step further this year. Probably less yards and TDs but better efficiency, less turnovers and more wins.
Oakland fans - " I think Bortles and Carr are close but i do think CARR takes a step further this year. Probably less yards and TDs but better efficiency, less turnovers and more wins."

 

Jags fans - "I think Bortles and Carr are close but i do think Bortles takes a step further this year. Probably less yards and TDs but better efficiency, less turnovers and more wins."
It's really amazing, when you think about it.  His first season he had the lowest rankings of all QBs. Now look at him.

Quote:Wouldn't call it an attack more so than pointing out the obvious. Two can play at that game,you forgot to put a space in between at and least....nice shovel you have there.
 

It was an attack.
Quote:Oakland fans - " I think Bortles and Carr are close but i do think CARR takes a step further this year. Probably less yards and TDs but better efficiency, less turnovers and more wins."

 

Jags fans - "I think Bortles and Carr are close but i do think Bortles takes a step further this year. Probably less yards and TDs but better efficiency, less turnovers and more wins."
 


Hahaha yeah pretty much. Right now Jax and Oak fans are the same exact person.
This is a list of top 100 going into 2016.

The players, collectively, think Bortles is the better player going into 2016.

Sorry Luck.

Sorry clot fans.

Sorry media who doesn't want to flip script on Jag bashing.

 

lol

Quote:This is a list of top 100 going into 2016.

The players, collectively, think Bortles is the better player going into 2016.

Sorry Luck.

Sorry clot fans.

Sorry media who doesn't want to flip script on Jag bashing.


lol
The butthurt is strong in social media and the media about this. Lol. It's great I love it. Recognition is a nice thing.
With Allen Robinson likely to make an appearance on the list, the Jaguars will have four players (Bortles, Hurns, Robinson, Telvin) from the same draft. Pretty amazing.

Quote:With Allen Robinson likely to make an appearance on the list, the Jaguars will have four players (Bortles, Hurns, Robinson, Telvin) from the same draft. Pretty amazing.
Just imagine once the team starts winning and Lee and Linder stay healthy, and if we hit on Ramsey, Jack, and another FA or two with Jackson and Gipson.

 

As it stands now, I can't imagine too many teams with 5 or more players on this top 100 list.

 

Could we be one of the few teams in the history of this list to have ten or more players on the top 100?
Quote:The butthurt is strong in social media and the media about this. Lol. It's great I love it. Recognition is a nice thing.
 


Lol they just talked about my text on 1010. I said how the list is based off 2015 performance and they basically said I was wrong and that's not how the players vote. But then said if the players are being objective and basing it just off 2015 then 56 sounds about right for Blake.
Quote:Lol they just talked about my text on 1010. I said how the list is based off 2015 performance and they basically said I was wrong and that's not how the players vote. But then said if the players are being objective and basing it just off 2015 then 56 sounds about right for Blake.
good job my man stick up for blake 
I think Blake deserves his spot I just didnt think the players had that respect for him. Good to see
Part of it is past year stats and part of it is reputation,like look at Dez or Peterson the year before.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29