The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Impressions From the Dolphins Game
|
(08-23-2019, 07:46 AM)flsprtsgod Wrote:(08-23-2019, 07:21 AM)SeldomRite Wrote: Only two impressions from last night. Or, the argument could go, sign a young udfa for less per year than a 6th round pick. I'm not taking sides here, and not jumping on Minshew, but Taysom Hill was a udfa in 2017, was in camp with the Packers, who cut him going down to 53 and brought in by the Saints. The Bills have Tyree Jackson this year, udfa QB. Again, not bashing Minshew, just saying that the argument that someone similar could be gotten through fa doesn't require that QB would have to cost more. The Jaguars liked Minshew enough to draft him, a 6th round pick isn't much for a backup who really hasn't looked terrible despite scoring few points in many quarters. Some teams have a backup who they don't want to start games, but is good enough to finish a game. Maybe that's the Jaguars. I'd be mostly worried about the fact that the first 4 drives were almost entirely 1) the new, expensive and presumably good new QB 2) the top first round RB who has had at least 1 very good year and 3) the leading WR from last year who most would argue is the Jaguars best WR. 4 drives, almost all plays were either Foles to Fournette or Foles to Westbrook. 3 and out, then 3 and out, then TD w/ big assist from 28 yard pass interference to Conley (only pass not to Fournette or Westbrook in the first 4 drives) and interception. Westbrook was 4.1 yards per target. 29 yards, 4 catches, 7 targets. Not great. Fournette was 3.9 yards per carry. Not great, not terrible, but not great. 2/3 for 19 yards receiving was a little better for Fournette. But these 3, these are the stars, right? These are not the stats of stars who win you games. You can watch each of Foles, Fournette and Westbrook and take out the highlights, and ignore the low points and say "well we're good if there are just the highlights". Ok, maybe. And, it's preseason, and that doesn't matter. A lot of teams though, they would put their starting QB out there, the starting QB goes 6/6 with a TD, with a 120 passer rating and comes off the field. That kind of performance is kind of what would be expected. A lot of the starting QBs who are considered "good" have been doing something like this. Here, it was not that. Not something to worry about, but something to look at. One point might be that Foles was throwing against a defense who had been practicing and was trying, vs week 1, when a lot of the QBs were doing well out there with their 6/6 performances. We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today! (08-23-2019, 12:11 PM)John Reglarperson Wrote:Overanalyzing preseason offensive stats isn't going to give you an accurate outlook for week one of the regular season.(08-23-2019, 07:46 AM)flsprtsgod Wrote: So pay, at best, vet minimum for production you could get from a 6th round rookie. Brilliant! (08-23-2019, 10:38 AM)NYC4jags Wrote: - Interesting thought here on Taven Bryan - Totally agree on Fournette. Get him moving then get him the ball - Minshew, Minshew, Minshew. IMO, he has grown remarkably since Game 1. He was the proverbial deer in the headlights against the Ravens and got knocked all over the place; last night- quick drops, quick reads, good release and accuracy. He may develop into an adequate backup.
Season Ticket holder since 2004.
![]()
(08-23-2019, 10:57 AM)Firesky Wrote: Firesky's musings from the "Dress Rehearsal": "12) Keep Terrelle Pryor over Keelan Cole if we don't go with 6 WR's." Agree with this (huge Pryor fan) but a larger issue might be what about Cole vs names like McBride and CJ Board. I think they keep 6 WRs, maybe even 7 if that works at all. There are Jaguar receivers who are all assumed to be good, be improving, be unquestioned core members of the WR group, players like Conley, Chark and Cole. And these guys might all be great, maybe. But in this preseason, they really haven't played much, and they really haven't performed all that well on the field. Cole was targeted once, penalty removed that play, Conley had a big pass interference, Chark wasn't targeted. In the first 2 preseason games, Cole and Chark got targets, and in games 1 and 2, they combined for 2 catches, 9 targets, 7 passing yards. So, you've got those 3 players who are all presumed to be good, but don't really look that good. And then you have 2 other guys, Tre McBride and CJ Board. Both McBride and Board have been playing all along, and if you look at their stats, it looks like they're doing pretty well. And both of those 2 guys are top 10% sparq guys. Board week 3 4/5 56 week 2 5/6 54 week 1 1/2 5 total 10/13 115 McBride week 3 3/6 31 week 2 4/5 47 week 1 3/5 42 total 10/16 120 Those numbers look pretty good. Is there going to be any consideration of keeping Board and/or McBride instead of Cole?
(08-23-2019, 12:26 PM)NYC4jags Wrote:(08-23-2019, 12:11 PM)John Reglarperson Wrote: ...Overanalyzing preseason offensive stats isn't going to give you an accurate outlook for week one of the regular season. Yeah, probably not. We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today! (08-23-2019, 12:55 PM)John Reglarperson Wrote: ... Barring something horrible happening in game 4, I see Board making the roster. If McBride has eligibility, he'll be on the PS. I think Cole and Pryor are fighting for the last (6th) spot. If Pryor wins out, Cole may end up with one of those nagging hangnails that keeps him on the IR this year. (08-23-2019, 04:10 PM)Mikey Wrote:(08-23-2019, 12:55 PM)John Reglarperson Wrote: ... I think CJ Board is making a strong case for consideration and McBride is close behind him. Pryor could throw a wrench into the gears of that machine though if he is healthy enough to have a statement game in pre-week 4. Westbrook Lee Conley Chark These ^ guys are locks obviously. I think they'll keep six. That means - Cole Board McBride Pryor Walker Brady These ^ guys are all fighting for the two remaining spots. Likely Cole and Pryor end up with the spots and Board, Brady and maybe Walker end up on the PS. I don't think McBride is eligible but I'm not certain.
We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today! (08-23-2019, 06:58 PM)flgatorsandjags Wrote: Taylor did start btwAll five of the presumed "ones" started. (unless Cann ends up beating Richardson, which I doubt) Robinson and Taylor had the fewest snaps as Marrone seems wisely hellbent on keeping the healthy. I'd assume Robinson didn't meet the minimum 25 snap requirement to be in that PFF grade mentioned a few posts ago.
(08-23-2019, 07:56 AM)sfljaguarsfan Wrote:(08-23-2019, 07:21 AM)SeldomRite Wrote: Only two impressions from last night.So you're saying Bortles could make that TD throw Foles made? That would've been a wobbly over throw or thrown out of bounds because Bortles knew u couldn't make that pass. If you really can't see that Foles is better than Bortles than there is no hope for you... Bortles has many similar and better TD throws. I don't know why you need to make things up. His issue was consistency not ability. Now Gabbert there was a guy who possibly never had a game at a high level as a Jag. (08-23-2019, 12:27 AM)Bullseye Wrote: Tonight's preseason game is a dichotomy. On the one hand, since this is our first look this year at the starters in game action, it has elements like a first preseason game of the year. Like kids at Christmas, we got to see our new QB in our new offensive scheme. We got to see our offensive line-at least one that bears some semblance to the one we'll see opening day. We got to see the starting defense for the first time this year. The new car smell that usually comes with the first preseason game was still there. On the other hand, since it was week three, which is usually known as the dress rehearsal before opening day, and this was the first look at the starters, it was like a preseason week 3 on steroids. There is interest in how the starters look against the other team's starters. There is some game planning happening, to say nothing of the game three nail biting hoping no major injuries happen to any starters. Anyway, here are my thoughts on the game. I think you are right with how awkward it felt seeing starters for the first time but 2 weeks from real football. They had drives where players were giving 70% then drives at 100%. Weird to see. 1- I agree we played the underneath way too much. Few plays Foles was just looking at Fournette to get in the flat. I also hope this was just pre season, not giving too much away but we played the check down too much. Teams will just keep stacking the box. 2- I dont know what happened. I thought Westbrook could have done a better job blocking off the corner from being able to come back and make the play. Get your body in the way and he has to foul you. Hoping it's just the connection and chemistry being forged. 3- I really hoped Chark and Cole were going to come out swinging this pre season. They haven't been bad and the O's not been great but thought theyd have made a few more plays. We are going to need both this season but we've heard a lot of good about Conley so far and with Lee and Pryor, they cant afford to slip back down the depth chart. That's the only criticism of the WR group I have. Since A-Rob and Hurns, we've never had a clear 1 and 2 and I couldn't tell you what the current chart would be.
08-23-2019, 08:02 PM
(This post was last modified: 08-24-2019, 07:30 AM by Bullseye.
Edit Reason: Auto correct is NOT your friend.
)
(08-23-2019, 05:29 PM)NYC4jags Wrote: https://twitter.com/PFF_Jaguars/status/1...11840?s=20 Excellent. As for Taylor starting, I could have sworn when Robinson started at LT, Ogbuehi started at RT. When Robinson left, Ogbuehi moved to LTand Taylor went in at RT. If not, measure mea culpa. Nevertheless, I thought Taylor played well....although if I got that wrong the rest of the analysis comes into question. Worst to 1st. Curse Reversed!
We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!
I think the thing that bothered me most about Foles is it didn't look like he could read defense and was just going to Dede every time it wasn't a checkdown or designed pass to 2.4nette.
Can't just throw it to Dede no matter what, dude needs to read the defense and throw to the guy that's going to come open. If he can't do that then it was one of the worst free agent signings the team's ever made.
(08-23-2019, 08:02 PM)Bullseye Wrote:(08-23-2019, 05:29 PM)NYC4jags Wrote: https://twitter.com/PFF_Jaguars/status/1...11840?s=20 Taylor started, then Ogbuehi came in and got hurt, then they put Taylor back in after Ogbuehi got hurt being Foles was still out there.
(08-23-2019, 08:08 PM)SeldomRite Wrote: I think the thing that bothered me most about Foles is it didn't look like he could read defense and was just going to Dede every time it wasn't a checkdown or designed pass to 2.4nette. Reading a defense post snap Is extremely hard, and only a very few can do it. Most QB’s have a predetermined 2 reads that they make and that’s it. Foles isn’t Manning or Brady. He’s only gonna be as good as our gameplan and playmakers are. As long as he can get the ball out of his hands quickly and efficiently with minimal mistakes, and can move the ball downfield, I’m happy with him; scripted plays and all.
I’m sure Foles felt pretty damn nervous. Big difference from being the back up guy who has to cover for the franchise guy and now becoming the franchise guy. Ima go with nerves for Foles. Time with tell if he can be the franchise guy now that all expectations are on him, as opposed to basically none in Philly. His expectations were to be a decent back up who could spell for Wentz hopefully keeping the team in games, but wouldn’t be leaned on to be the guy. Maybe he thrived on that? Well now he is THE guy. Let’s see, I’m optimistic.
We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!
(08-23-2019, 08:08 PM)SeldomRite Wrote: I think the thing that bothered me most about Foles is it didn't look like he could read defense and was just going to Dede every time it wasn't a checkdown or designed pass to 2.4nette. Yeah you're right, the Super Bowl MVP two years ago probably can't read a defense. (08-23-2019, 08:02 PM)Bullseye Wrote:(08-23-2019, 05:29 PM)NYC4jags Wrote: https://twitter.com/PFF_Jaguars/status/1...11840?s=20 Just double checked on gamepass. Taylor played RT on the first series. Cam came out on the third possession. Taylor stayed in. (08-23-2019, 08:20 PM)JaguarKick Wrote:(08-23-2019, 08:08 PM)SeldomRite Wrote: I think the thing that bothered me most about Foles is it didn't look like he could read defense and was just going to Dede every time it wasn't a checkdown or designed pass to 2.4nette. Well, he did throw 10 whole passes last night out of a limited playbook. Clearly he's established a bad habit of forcing the ball to Dede Westbrook. I'm certain we have all the evidence we need of this. #worstfreeagentsigningevaR
I think Bryan would have made a good OL, but it's probably too late to change.
|
Users browsing this thread: |
The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.