(12-15-2023, 05:10 PM)WingerDinger Wrote:

(12-15-2023, 04:41 PM)homebiscuit Wrote: I just don't understand him, sometimes. Although there are some on here who would argue with Mike over anything, I think he makes some salient points on occasion. At other times, like this, his willful obtuseness is baffling.

The trick is to not let him/them/they get to ya lol

Low hangin fruit.. Which is probably the reason why I haunt this section like a bi-polar Casper.

No one here gets to me. I just don't understand the selectively applied logic and ethics. But that's a calling card of the left. If found violating the same edicts they demand of others, they just change the definition. Like the Harvard president who won't call out antisemitism on her campus, and when it was discovered she had committed over two dozen instances of plagiarism in her doctoral thesis, they simply changed the standard to "instances of inadequate citation". But we all know if she were someone they were at ideological odds with, or someone they couldn't hold up as a model for their DEI policies, she would be canned immediately. 

The rest of the world calls these things hypocrisy. I can't wait to see the left's new definition for that word.

---