The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Trump and Kim Jong Un to Meet
|
(03-09-2018, 10:22 PM)TheO-LineMatters Wrote:(03-09-2018, 08:57 PM)Byron LeftTown Wrote: Like Bush barfing on the Japanese Premier bad? This absolutely is a comedy skit. We should just send Alec Baldwin. Kim wouldn't know the difference. He thought Dennis Rodman was Obama. We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!
(03-10-2018, 09:36 AM)The Real Marty Wrote:(03-10-2018, 09:24 AM)B2hibry Wrote: Sad how some of you have such hate that you can’t help but show ignorance toward a historic event. You should step back and holster the Trump hate while looking at the big picture. This has the potential to actually end a war and bring some stabilization to the area. This is just one talk of many that should take place absent of cronyism interference; face to face. Keep in mind, this isn’t a negotiation meeting. No sitting President has ever met or talked on the phone with a North Korean leader. Bet your [BLEEP] if this was anyone but Trump there would be 24/7 news on it and a call for new national holiday! Nothing wrong with a little hope and approval regardless of your disdain. I can't recall you actually complementing Trump one time for his vast array of accomplishments his first 14 months, so while you accuse some of not having independent thoughts, one could argue you of not having rational thoughts. (03-10-2018, 09:40 AM)Byron LeftTown Wrote:In all fairness to Rodman...he at least tried!(03-09-2018, 10:22 PM)TheO-LineMatters Wrote: This is not some comedy skit. You have two narcissistic blowhards who hate each other and have insulted one another in a room together. Both run entire countries and wield a lot of power. Neither one have filters and just blurt out what they are thinking without any consequences and the one from North Korea is known for having anyone who goes against him, assassinated. This has disaster written all over it. ![]() (03-10-2018, 09:36 AM)The Real Marty Wrote:Boy that’s rich coming from you. Bring up one post I have flopped, blindly sided, etc. Acting like you have half a clue of who I am. Yes, I voted for Trump and his ideas. I didn’t vote for his [BLEEP] personality though. So far, he has made some progress regardless of the numerous roadblocks. Not perfect, but a far cry from the stagnation of the past. It’s about moving this country forward and your kind would be happy going backwards just to spite the current POTUS.(03-10-2018, 09:24 AM)B2hibry Wrote: Sad how some of you have such hate that you can’t help but show ignorance toward a historic event. You should step back and holster the Trump hate while looking at the big picture. This has the potential to actually end a war and bring some stabilization to the area. This is just one talk of many that should take place absent of cronyism interference; face to face. Keep in mind, this isn’t a negotiation meeting. No sitting President has ever met or talked on the phone with a North Korean leader. Bet your [BLEEP] if this was anyone but Trump there would be 24/7 news on it and a call for new national holiday! Nothing wrong with a little hope and approval regardless of your disdain. ![]()
(03-10-2018, 09:46 AM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote:(03-10-2018, 09:36 AM)The Real Marty Wrote: I don't know if that was addressed at me, but I would like to point out that my "disdain" is not for this meeting. I am in favor of the meeting. I thought I made that clear. I like the fact that he cut the corporate tax rate. I don't like having a huge tax cut for everyone, but cutting the corporate tax rate was a good move. I have also said, in this thread, that I like the idea of a face to face meeting with Kim Jong Un. We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!
(03-10-2018, 10:01 AM)The Real Marty Wrote:(03-10-2018, 09:46 AM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote: I can't recall you actually complementing Trump one time for his vast array of accomplishments his first 14 months, so while you accuse some of not having independent thoughts, one could argue you of not having rational thoughts. Umm, you managed to insult Trump about 10 times in the post you claim is praising the meeting!!!
(03-10-2018, 10:05 AM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote:(03-10-2018, 10:01 AM)The Real Marty Wrote: I like the fact that he cut the corporate tax rate. I don't like having a huge tax cut for everyone, but cutting the corporate tax rate was a good move. He wants a meeting with him, but doesn't want Trump there. “An empty vessel makes the loudest sound, so they that have the least wit are the greatest babblers.”. - Plato
(03-10-2018, 09:55 AM)B2hibry Wrote:(03-10-2018, 09:36 AM)The Real Marty Wrote: I don't know if that was addressed at me, but I would like to point out that my "disdain" is not for this meeting. I am in favor of the meeting. I thought I made that clear.Boy that’s rich coming from you. Bring up one post I have flopped, blindly sided, etc. Acting like you have half a clue of who I am. Yes, I voted for Trump and his ideas. I didn’t vote for his [BLEEP] personality though. So far, he has made some progress regardless of the numerous roadblocks. Not perfect, but a far cry from the stagnation of the past. It’s about moving this country forward and your kind would be happy going backwards just to spite the current POTUS. Well, for the record, I would not "be happy going backwards just to spite the current POTUS." For all of our sakes, I hope he's a success. But I do strongly disagree with many of his policies. For example, I don't see how putting tariffs on steel to protect the steel industry is "moving the country forward." That's moving the country back to the 1920s. I just don't see how anyone with any sense of logic can favor a thing like that. It protects 50,000 steel jobs and endangers about 6 million jobs in companies that use steel in their products. I don't see how anyone with half a brain can listen to Trump and not see him for what he is- an ignorant con artist. He doesn't have any idea what he's talking about. All he does is pump himself up as the world's greatest everything, while in reality, he's way out of his depth. No way he should be President of the United States. When he got on that debate stage with a dozen other Republicans, every other person on that stage would have been a far better President than he is. The man is a complete idiot, and the way some of you cannot see this is mind boggling. (03-10-2018, 10:05 AM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote:(03-10-2018, 10:01 AM)The Real Marty Wrote: I like the fact that he cut the corporate tax rate. I don't like having a huge tax cut for everyone, but cutting the corporate tax rate was a good move. So? Meeting's a good idea, Trump's an idiot. Those two things are not mutually exclusive. (03-10-2018, 10:13 AM)flsprtsgod Wrote:(03-10-2018, 10:05 AM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote: Umm, you managed to insult Trump about 10 times in the post you claim is praising the meeting!!! Yes. It would be better with [insert name of any other Republican you want] there instead of Trump.
Yes, any of the other 16 republicans Trump absolutely destroyed in the primary would clearly be better fits.
TDS sufferers refuse to admit Trumps social media tactics and sanctions absolutely worked. We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!
(03-10-2018, 10:24 AM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote: Yes, any of the other 16 republicans Trump absolutely destroyed in the primary would clearly be better fits. No, I think it was when he got up on stage and bragged about his penis size. Or when he said he could grab women by the [BLEEP]. That swung over all the voters who ever wanted to grab 'em by the [BLEEP].
(03-10-2018, 10:26 AM)The Real Marty Wrote:(03-10-2018, 10:24 AM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote: Yes, any of the other 16 republicans Trump absolutely destroyed in the primary would clearly be better fits. TDS on full display here, lol
(03-10-2018, 10:30 AM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote:(03-10-2018, 10:26 AM)The Real Marty Wrote: No, I think it was when he got up on stage and bragged about his penis size. I wonder how many of his supporters are saying to themselves, "Gee, I wish I could be paying off porn stars." Probably a lot of them. I just think for the money he spent, he could have gotten someone better than Stormy Daniels.
(03-10-2018, 10:36 AM)The Real Marty Wrote:(03-10-2018, 10:30 AM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote: TDS on full display here, lol Show me one piece of evidence that Trump paid off a porn star. I'll be waiting and look like this guy once you find it. ![]() We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!
(03-10-2018, 10:16 AM)The Real Marty Wrote:(03-10-2018, 09:55 AM)B2hibry Wrote: Boy that’s rich coming from you. Bring up one post I have flopped, blindly sided, etc. Acting like you have half a clue of who I am. Yes, I voted for Trump and his ideas. I didn’t vote for his [BLEEP] personality though. So far, he has made some progress regardless of the numerous roadblocks. Not perfect, but a far cry from the stagnation of the past. It’s about moving this country forward and your kind would be happy going backwards just to spite the current POTUS. Kasich would probably just give Kim nukes and then claim he stopped Kim from developing them. Chris Christie would agree to give Kim billions of dollars in Global Warming reparations. "Why should I give information to you when all you want to do is find something wrong with it?" (03-10-2018, 10:54 AM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote:(03-10-2018, 10:36 AM)The Real Marty Wrote: I wonder how many of his supporters are saying to themselves, "Gee, I wish I could be paying off porn stars." Probably a lot of them. I just think for the money he spent, he could have gotten someone better than Stormy Daniels. It says all we need to know about Trumpettes when the issue is about who paid her off, not who [BLEEP] her while his wife was home with their newborn son.
If something can corrupt you, you're corrupted already.
- Bob Marley ![]() (03-10-2018, 10:16 AM)The Real Marty Wrote: I don't see how anyone with half a brain can listen to Trump and not see him for what he is- an ignorant con artist. He doesn't have any idea what he's talking about. All he does is pump himself up as the world's greatest everything, while in reality, he's way out of his depth. No way he should be President of the United States. When he got on that debate stage with a dozen other Republicans, every other person on that stage would have been a far better President than he is. The man is a complete idiot, and the way some of you cannot see this is mind boggling. QFT
If something can corrupt you, you're corrupted already.
- Bob Marley ![]()
(03-10-2018, 12:13 PM)rollerjag Wrote:(03-10-2018, 10:54 AM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote: Show me one piece of evidence that Trump paid off a porn star. I'll be waiting and look like this guy once you find it. Just stating facts. I know, something Greek to you. (03-10-2018, 12:16 PM)rollerjag Wrote:(03-10-2018, 10:16 AM)The Real Marty Wrote: I don't see how anyone with half a brain can listen to Trump and not see him for what he is- an ignorant con artist. He doesn't have any idea what he's talking about. All he does is pump himself up as the world's greatest everything, while in reality, he's way out of his depth. No way he should be President of the United States. When he got on that debate stage with a dozen other Republicans, every other person on that stage would have been a far better President than he is. The man is a complete idiot, and the way some of you cannot see this is mind boggling. Did you just quote someone's opinion for truth? We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!
(03-10-2018, 12:41 PM)DragonFury Wrote:(03-10-2018, 09:30 AM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote: A recent study showed Do you really want to do this? https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/eri...-negative/ (03-10-2018, 10:24 AM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote: Yes, any of the other 16 republicans Trump absolutely destroyed in the primary would clearly be better fits. You forgot to mention the colluding with Russia. Oh, and he ran against H. Clinton and still lost the popular vote. Yep, a real genius. Oh, and your comment about T. Carlson. You're admitting you watch that guy? He used to be a good writer and interviewer, but then he went for the big money and agreed to play the O'Reilly buffoon role - you know, find some loon, claim he's a (gasp) "liberal" and make fun of him for sixty minutes. Real entertainment. You must be real hard up for ways to avoid interacting with family members.
The sun's not yellow, it's chicken.
|
Users browsing this thread: |
The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.