More effective than lethal injection

Justice Department updates rule, clears way for execution by firing squad

The Department of Justice has finalized amendments to authorize federal executions by firing squad.

https://www.wnd.com/2020/11/justice-depa...gSabf4fomI

---

Trump did that a few days ago. The question is why bother if he is losing?

Sent from my SM-G781U using Tapatalk

---

I think firing squad is fine.
Hanging is fine too.
Both are quick with a little but not much pain and little chance of screw-ups.
I don't see the point of lethal injection, I never did. Asking doctors to be involved, when they swore to do no harm. And the whole idea that pain should be eliminated or else it's cruel, I don't agree. Excessive pain is cruel. A few moments of pain as part of avoiding a botched execution is not.
Anyhow, if SCOTUS really thinks we have to eliminate uncertainty and pain, there is a simple and foolproof way to ensure someone dies without feeling any pain: inert gas. The human body has a pain reflex to the absence of air, inability to inhale or exhale, and extreme concentrations of certain gases like CO2. It has no pain reflex to the absence of oxygen. So if you just put someone in a nitrogen-argon mix, they will faint and lose consciousness in seconds and be brain dead within minutes, all without any stress at all.

---

My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.

I was always a fan of Old Sparky. The execution method should fit the crime. In some cases, the more mistakes the better.

---

I think firing squad is fine.
Hanging is fine too.
Both are quick with a little but not much pain and little chance of screw-ups.
I don't see the point of lethal injection, I never did.  Asking doctors to be involved, when they swore to do no harm.  And the whole idea that pain should be eliminated or else it's cruel, I don't agree.  Excessive pain is cruel.  A few moments of pain as part of avoiding a botched execution is not.
Anyhow, if SCOTUS really thinks we have to eliminate uncertainty and pain, there is a simple and foolproof way to ensure someone dies without feeling any pain: inert gas. The human body has a pain reflex to the absence of air, inability to inhale or exhale, and extreme concentrations of certain gases like CO2. It has no pain reflex to the absence of oxygen.  So if you just put someone in a nitrogen-argon mix, they will faint and lose consciousness in seconds and be brain dead within minutes, all without any stress at all.

It's all starting to make sense now.

---

I was always a fan of Old Sparky. The execution method should fit the crime. In some cases, the more mistakes the better.

---

I think firing squad is fine.
Hanging is fine too.
Both are quick with a little but not much pain and little chance of screw-ups.
I don't see the point of lethal injection, I never did.  Asking doctors to be involved, when they swore to do no harm.  And the whole idea that pain should be eliminated or else it's cruel, I don't agree.  Excessive pain is cruel.  A few moments of pain as part of avoiding a botched execution is not.
Anyhow, if SCOTUS really thinks we have to eliminate uncertainty and pain, there is a simple and foolproof way to ensure someone dies without feeling any pain: inert gas. The human body has a pain reflex to the absence of air, inability to inhale or exhale, and extreme concentrations of certain gases like CO2. It has no pain reflex to the absence of oxygen.  So if you just put someone in a nitrogen-argon mix, they will faint and lose consciousness in seconds and be brain dead within minutes, all without any stress at all.

It's all starting to make sense now.

That's just referred to as "Saturday Night" by StroudCrowd.

---

This is a results-oriented business.  There are no trophies or titles given for "moral victories" or for "winning the draft".  Our record with DC is 37-86.  6-10 is our 2nd best season in 8 years of Caldwell leadership.  These are the FACTS.

I think I'd choose firing squad if given the option.

---

The thing that sucks about a firing squad is only one person has a live round in the chamber, the rest are blanks, allegedly so the person firing the weapon doesn't know it was his bullet that did the deed.

Firing a blank feels a lot different than firing a live round. So, I guess in theory it sounds good to outsiders.. but the reality is the person knows who had the live round. Everyone should have a live round, that way it's a much quicker, guaranteed immediate death.

---

The thing that sucks about a firing squad is only one person has a live round in the chamber, the rest are blanks, allegedly so the person firing the weapon doesn't know it was his bullet that did the deed.

Firing a blank feels a lot different than firing a live round. So, I guess in theory it sounds good to outsiders.. but the reality is the person knows who had the live round. Everyone should have a live round, that way it's a much quicker, guaranteed immediate death.

I believe you have that opposite. Only one rifle has a blank.

---

The thing that sucks about a firing squad is only one person has a live round in the chamber, the rest are blanks, allegedly so the person firing the weapon doesn't know it was his bullet that did the deed.

Firing a blank feels a lot different than firing a live round. So, I guess in theory it sounds good to outsiders.. but the reality is the person knows who had the live round. Everyone should have a live round, that way it's a much quicker, guaranteed immediate death.

I believe you have that opposite. Only one rifle has a blank.

If that's true... it's even dumber. What's the point of that? So one person doesn't feel the guilt? Or is the idea that any of them could have had the blank so all guilt is alleviated? Funny stuff.

Recoil isn't just from the gunpowder being ignited, it's from the projectile leaving the rifle causing more concentrated gas to be released behind it. It makes more recoil, and is obvious to anyone with firearms experience - which I assume is what they'd use for a firing squad.

---

I believe you have that opposite. Only one rifle has a blank.

If that's true... it's even dumber. What's the point of that? So one person doesn't feel the guilt?

It’s not like they’re forcing anyone to do it.

---

I believe you have that opposite. Only one rifle has a blank.

If that's true... it's even dumber. What's the point of that? So one person doesn't feel the guilt?

No, you have the illusion of innocence. No one knows who had the blank so all of them can believe it was himself.

---

“An empty vessel makes the loudest sound, so they that have the least wit are the greatest babblers.”. - Plato

If that's true... it's even dumber. What's the point of that? So one person doesn't feel the guilt?

No, you have the illusion of innocence. No one knows who had the blank so all of them can believe it was himself.

A somewhat useful tact when using non-volunteers to do the deed. 

Probably a disappointment for anyone volunteering.

---

No, you have the illusion of innocence. No one knows who had the blank so all of them can believe it was himself.

A somewhat useful tact when using non-volunteers to do the deed. 

Probably a disappointment for anyone volunteering.

Solution? Ask the family members of the victim if they want to be on the firing squad.

---

No, you have the illusion of innocence. No one knows who had the blank so all of them can believe it was himself.

A somewhat useful tact when using non-volunteers to do the deed. 

Probably a disappointment for anyone volunteering.

Modern accuracy makes it difficult to keep the plausible deniability. Plus I'd aim for the forehead after asking for a regular load.

---

A somewhat useful tact when using non-volunteers to do the deed. 

Probably a disappointment for anyone volunteering.

Solution? Ask the family members of the victim if they want to be on the firing squad.

You'd have 6 hits, none lethal.

---

“An empty vessel makes the loudest sound, so they that have the least wit are the greatest babblers.”. - Plato

A somewhat useful tact when using non-volunteers to do the deed. 

Probably a disappointment for anyone volunteering.

Modern accuracy makes it difficult to keep the plausible deniability. Plus I'd aim for the forehead after asking for a regular load.

---

Solution? Ask the family members of the victim if they want to be on the firing squad.

You'd have 6 hits, none lethal.

If you wait long enough sure it would be

---

Not sure id want the death penalty in a so called corrupt state.

Deep state might set you up for all the Trump loving

---

Not sure id want the death penalty in a so called corrupt state.

Deep state might set you up for all the Trump loving

I don't think you'd want the death penalty anywhere.

---

“An empty vessel makes the loudest sound, so they that have the least wit are the greatest babblers.”. - Plato

Not sure id want the death penalty in a so called corrupt state.

Deep state might set you up for all the Trump loving

I don't think you'd want the death penalty anywhere.

What can I say, maybe I have strong Christian values?

---

 

Probably a disappointment for anyone volunteering.

---

Solution? Ask the family members of the victim if they want to be on the firing squad.

You'd have 6 hits, none lethal.

6 hits is to many.  Much more fun with just one round.........in a revolver of course.

Spin the cylinder, then.........click.  

"Guess it wasn't that one.  Let's try again."  Click.

"0 for 2.  You wanna a cigarette before we try again?"  Click

"Wow, I really thought that was the one.  Should I spin it again or just pull the trigger?"  Click.

"Four in a row!  You might make it all the way to 6.  Nobody's ever made it to 6 before.  Tell you what, if you make past the next one, you're free to go."  Bang.

"Sorry dude, it's a 5 shot revolver."

---

When you get into the endzone, act like you've been there before.

I don't think you'd want the death penalty anywhere.

What can I say, maybe I have strong Christian values?

Doubtful.

---

“An empty vessel makes the loudest sound, so they that have the least wit are the greatest babblers.”. - Plato