Create Account


Board Performance Issues We are aware of performance issues on the board and are working to resolve them! The board may be intermittently unavailable during this time. (May 07) x


The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Let's Talk About- Political Edition

(This post was last modified: 01-13-2022, 12:50 PM by mikesez. Edited 1 time in total.)

(01-13-2022, 09:50 AM)Sneakers Wrote:
(01-12-2022, 11:53 PM)NewJagsCity Wrote: Has any 'insurrectionist' actually made a statement that they hoped/believed this?

No, but he read it on the internet, and everybody knows you can't post anything on the internet that isn't true.

As soon as I saw what was happening on live stream, I thought to myself, "these guys want the national guard to stand down or switch sides." I could think of no other reason why they would have stormed the building. I still can't think of one. It has nothing to do with what I might be reading on the internet.

It doesn't matter if their plan was to just talk to the vice president, talk to pelosi, or threaten either of them with violence, or what. They knew that they would not get to do any of that unless the guys with guns stood down or switched sides.
My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


(This post was last modified: 01-13-2022, 02:31 PM by homebiscuit. Edited 1 time in total.)

These democrats are such blatant hypocrites but their constituents won’t hold them accountable.

Just under five years ago more than half of the Democrats currently in the Senate signed a letter defending the 60-vote filibuster on legislation – but now many of them are leading the charge to eliminate it as soon as this weekend…
Reply


(01-13-2022, 12:48 PM)mikesez Wrote:
(01-13-2022, 09:50 AM)Sneakers Wrote: No, but he read it on the internet, and everybody knows you can't post anything on the internet that isn't true.

As soon as I saw what was happening on live stream, I thought to myself, "these guys want the national guard to stand down or switch sides." I could think of no other reason why they would have stormed the building. I still can't think of one. It has nothing to do with what I might be reading on the internet.

It doesn't matter if their plan was to just talk to the vice president, talk to pelosi, or threaten either of them with violence, or what. They knew that they would not get to do any of that unless the guys with guns stood down or switched sides.

The national guard wasn’t there when they broke into the building, so Kreskin, how could you have known they wanted them to stand down or switch sides? They weren’t there until hours later…
What in the Wide Wide World of Sports is agoin' on here???
Reply


(01-13-2022, 02:46 PM)Bchbunnie4 Wrote:
(01-13-2022, 12:48 PM)mikesez Wrote: As soon as I saw what was happening on live stream, I thought to myself, "these guys want the national guard to stand down or switch sides." I could think of no other reason why they would have stormed the building. I still can't think of one. It has nothing to do with what I might be reading on the internet.

It doesn't matter if their plan was to just talk to the vice president, talk to pelosi, or threaten either of them with violence, or what. They knew that they would not get to do any of that unless the guys with guns stood down or switched sides.

The national guard wasn’t there when they broke into the building, so Kreskin, how could you have known they wanted them to stand down or switch sides? They weren’t there until hours later…

The police were there. They have guns and uniforms too. The math is the same.  The insurrectionists knew that they could not win if all of the armed men with uniforms stayed loyal and fought.  They were counting on some or all of them to stand down or change sides.  Otherwise it's a pointless adventure that only lands them in jail. Do you think they're that irrational?
My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.
Reply


(01-13-2022, 02:51 PM)mikesez Wrote:
(01-13-2022, 02:46 PM)Bchbunnie4 Wrote: The national guard wasn’t there when they broke into the building, so Kreskin, how could you have known they wanted them to stand down or switch sides? They weren’t there until hours later…

The police were there. They have guns and uniforms too. The math is the same.  The insurrectionists knew that they could not win if all of the armed men with uniforms stayed loyal and fought.  They were counting on some or all of them to stand down or change sides.  Otherwise it's a pointless adventure that only lands them in jail. Do you think they're that irrational?

Uhhh....did you see them? Lol
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!



(01-13-2022, 02:51 PM)mikesez Wrote:
(01-13-2022, 02:46 PM)Bchbunnie4 Wrote: The national guard wasn’t there when they broke into the building, so Kreskin, how could you have known they wanted them to stand down or switch sides? They weren’t there until hours later…

The police were there. They have guns and uniforms too. The math is the same.  The insurrectionists knew that they could not win if all of the armed men with uniforms stayed loyal and fought.  They were counting on some or all of them to stand down or change sides.  Otherwise it's a pointless adventure that only lands them in jail. Do you think they're that irrational?
They were in on it, they let them in. Why did a handful of capital police kill themselves? They were taking orders from the politicians.

Sent from my SM-T970 using Tapatalk
Reply


I think Mike hasn't read anything about Jan 6, like the actual timeline, or anything else outside of what his favorite media channel says happened. Either that or he's being his self-admitted smug self and is just pulling one over on everyone. Again.
Reply


(01-13-2022, 02:51 PM)mikesez Wrote:
(01-13-2022, 02:46 PM)Bchbunnie4 Wrote: The national guard wasn’t there when they broke into the building, so Kreskin, how could you have known they wanted them to stand down or switch sides? They weren’t there until hours later…

The police were there. They have guns and uniforms too. The math is the same.  The insurrectionists BLM activists knew that they could not win if all of the Peaceful protesters armed men with uniforms stayed peaceful loyal and fought.  They were counting on some or all of them to torch buildings and overturn police cars stand down or change sides.  Otherwise it's a pointless adventure that only lands them in jail. Do you think they're that irrational?

Here's an interesting variation of your "reasoning".  How do you answer now?
When you get into the endzone, act like you've been there before.
Reply


Your tax dollars at work. 

The stupid irony personifies this administration. Then it occurred to me that Hunter was probably getting a cut. He'll take care of the Big Guy later. 

KN95 masks distributed to House members stamped with 'MADE IN CHINA' | Fox News
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!



(01-13-2022, 08:58 PM)homebiscuit Wrote: Your tax dollars at work. 

The stupid irony personifies this administration. Then it occurred to me that Hunter was probably getting a cut. He'll take care of the Big Guy later. 

KN95 masks distributed to House members stamped with 'MADE IN CHINA' | Fox News

It's difficult to distinguish between the incompetence and the corruption in this administration.
When you get into the endzone, act like you've been there before.
Reply


(01-13-2022, 08:39 PM)Sneakers Wrote:
(01-13-2022, 02:51 PM)mikesez Wrote: The police were there. They have guns and uniforms too. The math is the same.  The insurrectionists BLM activists knew that they could not win if all of the Peaceful protesters armed men with uniforms stayed peaceful loyal and fought.  They were counting on some or all of them to torch buildings and overturn police cars stand down or change sides.  Otherwise it's a pointless adventure that only lands them in jail. Do you think they're that irrational?

Here's an interesting variation of your "reasoning".  How do you answer now?

It doesn't follow.
If the protests stay peaceful, no one gets arrested.
My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.
Reply


(01-13-2022, 02:51 PM)mikesez Wrote:
(01-13-2022, 02:46 PM)Bchbunnie4 Wrote: The national guard wasn’t there when they broke into the building, so Kreskin, how could you have known they wanted them to stand down or switch sides? They weren’t there until hours later…

The police were there. They have guns and uniforms too. The math is the same.  The insurrectionists knew that they could not win if all of the armed men with uniforms stayed loyal and fought.  They were counting on some or all of them to stand down or change sides.  Otherwise it's a pointless adventure that only lands them in jail. Do you think they're that irrational?

You have gone over the edge Mr. Sez.
Original Season Ticket Holder - Retired  1995 - 2020


At some point you just have to let go of what you thought should happen and live in what is happening.
 

Reply


(01-13-2022, 08:36 PM)americus 2.0 Wrote: I think Mike hasn't read anything about Jan 6, like the actual timeline, or anything else outside of what his favorite media channel says happened. Either that or he's being his self-admitted smug self and is just pulling one over on everyone. Again.

I just read some excerpts from a beefy indictment today.  10 oathkeepers arrested for seditious conspiracy.  Did you see that?
My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!



(01-13-2022, 11:46 AM)Cleatwood Wrote:
(01-13-2022, 09:50 AM)Sneakers Wrote: No, but he read it on the internet, and everybody knows you can't post anything on the internet that isn't true.
Buddy. This applies to a lot of people on this message board. Not just Mike. Check out what Ronster posts lol

Yeah, but Ronster is angry irrational. Personally, I think he's a guy that probably wouldn't be following politics under different circumstances, but he feels lied to, and he's acting accordingly. I can filter all of his misinformation through that lens. Mike is just woefully misinformed and smug about it. It's Sandor Clegane vs Cersei Lannister.
Reply


(01-13-2022, 09:25 PM)mikesez Wrote:
(01-13-2022, 08:36 PM)americus 2.0 Wrote: I think Mike hasn't read anything about Jan 6, like the actual timeline, or anything else outside of what his favorite media channel says happened. Either that or he's being his self-admitted smug self and is just pulling one over on everyone. Again.

I just read some excerpts from a beefy indictment today.  10 oathkeepers arrested for seditious conspiracy.  Did you see that?

Once again the feds were in the group and encouraging them to commit crimes. They also set them up by doing nothing to antifa. It's been rumored/known for a while.

Why is it that the feds are only going after the right wing groups while the left groups are burning and destroying things?

Sent from my SM-G781U using Tapatalk
Reply


[Image: fd.jpg]
Instead of a sign that says "Do Not Disturb" I need one that says "Already Disturbed Proceed With Caution."
Reply


What it this were true...... (sometimes I think it is.....)

[Image: gov.jpg]
Instead of a sign that says "Do Not Disturb" I need one that says "Already Disturbed Proceed With Caution."
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!



Nothing that occurred on Jan 6 in any way prevented Congress from certifying the election results.  Delayed - maybe.  Prevented - no.

Jan 6 was an insurrection in the same way that deliberately paying your federal income taxes a day late is an insurrection.
Reply


(01-14-2022, 01:24 AM)p_rushing Wrote:
(01-13-2022, 09:25 PM)mikesez Wrote: I just read some excerpts from a beefy indictment today.  10 oathkeepers arrested for seditious conspiracy.  Did you see that?

Once again the feds were in the group and encouraging them to commit crimes. They also set them up by doing nothing to antifa. It's been rumored/known for a while.

Why is it that the feds are only going after the right wing groups while the left groups are burning and destroying things?

Sent from my SM-G781U using Tapatalk

Sounds like sheep to me.
Reply


(01-15-2022, 05:35 PM)captivating Wrote:
(01-14-2022, 01:24 AM)p_rushing Wrote: Once again the feds were in the group and encouraging them to commit crimes. They also set them up by doing nothing to antifa. It's been rumored/known for a while.

Why is it that the feds are only going after the right wing groups while the left groups are burning and destroying things?

Sent from my SM-G781U using Tapatalk

Sounds like sheep to me.

Being in Australia, I’m sure you’re very familiar with sheep.
What in the Wide Wide World of Sports is agoin' on here???
Reply




Users browsing this thread:
27 Guest(s)

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.


ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!