You do realize how ridiculous that is, right? How many people have gone to trial and been charged with having a firearm? One. You finally have it. Your non-smoking gun.

---

You do realize how ridiculous that is, right? How many people have gone to trial and been charged with having a firearm? One. You finally have it. Your non-smoking gun.

You think every single one that was carrying had a family member turn them in afterwards? Of course not.  Most people try to help their family members avoid prison.

---

My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.

LOL.  His new narrative is an "armed" mob of insurrectionists.

I said all along some of them were armed.  You haven't been paying attention to anything I say.  Most people don't comment on things they choose not to pay attention to.  You're pretty weird.

You've also insisted every person there was violent yet when a man was found to not have done the violence he was charged with you agreed that he wasn't violent and shouldn't have been convicted or even arrested. Forgive us if we aren't able to keep us with your double speak.

---

I said all along some of them were armed.  You haven't been paying attention to anything I say.  Most people don't comment on things they choose not to pay attention to.  You're pretty weird.

You've also insisted every person there was violent yet when a man was found to not have done the violence he was charged with you agreed that he wasn't violent and shouldn't have been convicted or even arrested. Forgive us if we aren't able to keep us with your double speak.

I do forgive you.  Breaking down a barrier is against the law.  Walking through a barrier that was already broken down is inadvisable but not criminal.  Everyone who went in that day was intent on re-installing Trump and following his orders.  They showed up when he said to, fought like hell when he said to, then left when he said to.  So all of them were committing violence against the constitution.  But not all of them were breaking the law, as I said.

---

My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.

You've also insisted every person there was violent yet when a man was found to not have done the violence he was charged with you agreed that he wasn't violent and shouldn't have been convicted or even arrested. Forgive us if we aren't able to keep us with your double speak.

I do forgive you.  Breaking down a barrier is against the law.  Walking through a barrier that was already broken down is inadvisable but not criminal.  Everyone who went in that day was intent on re-installing Trump and following his orders.  They showed up when he said to, fought like hell when he said to, then left when he said to.  So all of them were committing violence against the constitution.  But not all of them were breaking the law, as I said.

LOL.  Do you EVER think before you hit Post Reply?

---

When you get into the endzone, act like you've been there before.

“Fought like Hell”?  Lmfao.   I’m not even sure CNN reported that one.

---

“Fought like Hell”?  Lmfao.   I’m not even sure CNN reported that one.

You didn't know?  Here's a picture.

---

When you get into the endzone, act like you've been there before.

“Fought like Hell”?  Lmfao.   I’m not even sure CNN reported that one.

You didn't know?  Here's a picture.

Oh [BLEEP].   I didn’t even realize it was that bad.  Thoughts and prayers towards the statues and paintings that have had their pictures taken without consent.  Statue Lives Matter!

---

You didn't know?  Here's a picture.

Oh [BLEEP].   I didn’t even realize it was that bad.  Thoughts and prayers towards the statues and paintings that have had their pictures taken without consent.  Statue Lives Matter!

Statues lives don't even matter to other statues..

---

I do forgive you.  Breaking down a barrier is against the law.  Walking through a barrier that was already broken down is inadvisable but not criminal.  Everyone who went in that day was intent on re-installing Trump and following his orders.  They showed up when he said to, fought like hell when he said to, then left when he said to.  So all of them were committing violence against the constitution.  But not all of them were breaking the law, as I said.

LOL.  Do you EVER think before you hit Post Reply?

Do you not understand the difference between criminal law and the constitution?
Criminal law is for helping juries decide who should pay fines and go to jail.
The Constitution is for deciding who makes the laws and who enforces them and when those people have to give way to a successor.  There isn't always a criminal law to correspond to every possible violation of the constitution.

---

My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.

“Fought like Hell”?  Lmfao.   I’m not even sure CNN reported that one.

They didn't have to report it!  Here it is from the man himself!
https://youtu.be/s_OULGUguQc?t=71


And people listened! see below:
https://youtu.be/DXnHIJkZZAs?t=22

---

My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.

You've also insisted every person there was violent yet when a man was found to not have done the violence he was charged with you agreed that he wasn't violent and shouldn't have been convicted or even arrested. Forgive us if we aren't able to keep us with your double speak.

I do forgive you.  Breaking down a barrier is against the law.  Walking through a barrier that was already broken down is inadvisable but not criminal.  Everyone who went in that day was intent on re-installing Trump and following his orders.  They showed up when he said to, fought like hell when he said to, then left when he said to.  So all of them were committing violence against the constitution.  But not all of them were breaking the law, as I said.

I don't need your forgiveness. 

If I had the time and inclination I'd find and share with you the times you said every single person who entered the Capitol that day were criminals and should all go to prison.

---

You could if this site had a decent search function. I hate using it. If there were one thing I could change about this message board, that would be it.

---

I do forgive you.  Breaking down a barrier is against the law.  Walking through a barrier that was already broken down is inadvisable but not criminal.  Everyone who went in that day was intent on re-installing Trump and following his orders.  They showed up when he said to, fought like hell when he said to, then left when he said to.  So all of them were committing violence against the constitution.  But not all of them were breaking the law, as I said.

I don't need your forgiveness. 

If I had the time and inclination I'd find and share with you the times you said every single person who entered the Capitol that day were criminals and should all go to prison.

Pretty sure I called them insurrectionists, not criminals.  But OK.

---

My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.

I don't need your forgiveness. 

If I had the time and inclination I'd find and share with you the times you said every single person who entered the Capitol that day were criminals and should all go to prison.

Pretty sure I called them insurrectionists, not criminals.  But OK.

Is insurrection a crime?

---

“An empty vessel makes the loudest sound, so they that have the least wit are the greatest babblers.”. - Plato

Pretty sure I called them insurrectionists, not criminals.  But OK.

Is insurrection a crime?

Insurrectionist is a vague term which could mean someone who violated the insurrection statute, someone who participated in an insurrection but without fully violating the statute, or someone who supports or agrees with those who participate in insurrections.

---

My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.

Is insurrection a crime?

Insurrectionist is a vague term which could mean someone who violated the insurrection statute, someone who participated in an insurrection but without fully violating the statute, or someone who supports or agrees with those who participate in insurrections.

Soooooo, yes or no?

---

“An empty vessel makes the loudest sound, so they that have the least wit are the greatest babblers.”. - Plato

Insurrectionist is a vague term which could mean someone who violated the insurrection statute, someone who participated in an insurrection but without fully violating the statute, or someone who supports or agrees with those who participate in insurrections.

Soooooo, yes or no?

Yes, it's a crime in the US Code.  If you're a federal prosecutor, that's the definition you would use.  If you're anyone else, you're free to use other definitions of "insurrection" and "crime" that may be less formal.

---

My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.

Soooooo, yes or no?

Yes, it's a crime in the US Code.  If you're a federal prosecutor, that's the definition you would use.  If you're anyone else, you're free to use other definitions of "insurrection" and "crime" that may be less formal.

So yeah, by your own admission you called all of them criminals. Keep on spinning it however you want, you just keep ending up in the corner surrounded by paint.

---

“An empty vessel makes the loudest sound, so they that have the least wit are the greatest babblers.”. - Plato

Yes, it's a crime in the US Code.  If you're a federal prosecutor, that's the definition you would use.  If you're anyone else, you're free to use other definitions of "insurrection" and "crime" that may be less formal.

So yeah, by your own admission you called all of them criminals. Keep on spinning it however you want, you just keep ending up in the corner surrounded by paint.

https://tenor.com/XClr.gif

---

My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.