Create Account


Board Performance Issues We are aware of performance issues on the board and are working to resolve them! The board may be intermittently unavailable during this time. (May 07) x


The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Elon Musk now owns Twitter


(11-21-2022, 10:08 PM)WingerDinger Wrote: Ya'll gettin sucked into that vacuum lololol

I think we need popcorn. Lol
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!



(11-22-2022, 11:10 AM)americus 2.0 Wrote:
(11-21-2022, 10:08 PM)WingerDinger Wrote: Ya'll gettin sucked into that vacuum lololol

I think we need popcorn. Lol

Yes Ma'am!!
[Image: SaKG4.gif]
Reply


(11-22-2022, 10:58 AM)mikesez Wrote:
(11-22-2022, 10:46 AM)flsprtsgod Wrote: The only point here is the one on top of your head, you try to be the smartest moron in the room but every single time you just make yourself look more foolish than the time before.

Once again you go ad hominem rather than address the points made.
You're the idiot here, not me.  At least you're funny, though.

Your point was already discredited. That you keep trying to act like it wasn't is just more evidence of your problem.
“An empty vessel makes the loudest sound, so they that have the least wit are the greatest babblers.”. - Plato

Reply


You guys are missing the point. Typically, Mike was attempting to steer this argument into one of his tangents to avoid the main subject.

Now, let’s debate the differences, obligations and advantages between ownership and stewardship. Proceed.
Reply


(11-22-2022, 12:42 PM)homebiscuit Wrote: You guys are missing the point. Typically, Mike was attempting to steer this argument into one of his tangents to avoid the main subject.

Now, let’s debate the differences, obligations and advantages between ownership and stewardship. Proceed.

Stewardship is irrelevant to this discussion. Moving along...
“An empty vessel makes the loudest sound, so they that have the least wit are the greatest babblers.”. - Plato

Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!



However, I have to give Mike credit because my post achieved his other goal; making the thread about him.

Good job, Mike!
Reply


(11-22-2022, 12:54 PM)flsprtsgod Wrote:
(11-22-2022, 12:42 PM)homebiscuit Wrote: You guys are missing the point. Typically, Mike was attempting to steer this argument into one of his tangents to avoid the main subject.

Now, let’s debate the differences, obligations and advantages between ownership and stewardship. Proceed.

Stewardship is irrelevant to this discussion. Moving along...

Ok.. We need to have a topic on this section of the forum and name it Mikey. And it needs to be pinned..

That way, we can keep all his garbage in one thead, and we (meaning me, or anyone else who wants to participate) can visit time to time and drop a couple of A-Bombs without the worry of collateral damage and throwing the discussion off track..

It would be a great thread for mental health.. Better than a therapy dog!!

Nice big target!!
[Image: SaKG4.gif]
Reply

(This post was last modified: 11-22-2022, 01:20 PM by mikesez.)

(11-22-2022, 01:07 PM)homebiscuit Wrote: However, I have to give Mike credit because my post achieved his other goal; making the thread about him.

Good job, Mike!

FSG made the thread about me when he said my head was pointed.  Up to that point it was about Elon Musk owning Twitter.

(11-22-2022, 12:54 PM)flsprtsgod Wrote:
(11-22-2022, 12:42 PM)homebiscuit Wrote: You guys are missing the point. Typically, Mike was attempting to steer this argument into one of his tangents to avoid the main subject.

Now, let’s debate the differences, obligations and advantages between ownership and stewardship. Proceed.

Stewardship is irrelevant to this discussion. Moving along...

Stewardship will suddenly be very relevant if Twitter goes bankrupt and BofA gets paid back pennies on the dollar...
My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.
Reply


(11-22-2022, 01:19 PM)mikesez Wrote:
(11-22-2022, 01:07 PM)homebiscuit Wrote: However, I have to give Mike credit because my post achieved his other goal; making the thread about him.

Good job, Mike!

FSG made the thread about me when he said my head was pointed.  Up to that point it was about Elon Musk owning Twitter.

(11-22-2022, 12:54 PM)flsprtsgod Wrote: Stewardship is irrelevant to this discussion. Moving along...

Stewardship will suddenly be very relevant if Twitter goes bankrupt and BofA gets paid back pennies on the dollar...

It's likely a consortium of banks sharing risk, not just BofA.
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!



(11-22-2022, 01:24 PM)KingIngram052787 Wrote:
(11-22-2022, 01:19 PM)mikesez Wrote: FSG made the thread about me when he said my head was pointed.  Up to that point it was about Elon Musk owning Twitter.


Stewardship will suddenly be very relevant if Twitter goes bankrupt and BofA gets paid back pennies on the dollar...

It's likely a consortium of banks sharing risk, not just BofA.

Does that change the point I'm making? Or are you being pedantic?
My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.
Reply


(11-22-2022, 01:27 PM)mikesez Wrote:
(11-22-2022, 01:24 PM)KingIngram052787 Wrote: It's likely a consortium of banks sharing risk, not just BofA.

Does that change the point I'm making? Or are you being pedantic?

The entire point you're making, in the context of this thread and Elon Musk owning or "owning" Twitter, is pedantic.  I'm just making a factual statement as I get dumber reading this stupid argument.
Reply

Reply


(11-22-2022, 02:33 PM)KingIngram052787 Wrote:
(11-22-2022, 01:27 PM)mikesez Wrote: Does that change the point I'm making? Or are you being pedantic?

The entire point you're making, in the context of this thread and Elon Musk owning or "owning" Twitter, is pedantic.  I'm just making a factual statement as I get dumber reading this stupid argument.

The question of ownership or stewardship is a deep question of worldview.  
But the number of banks that are along for this ride is pedantic when the point is, Musk isn't in this alone.  Regardless of if one or two or ten commercial banks are in this with him, the plays he is making affect the fortunes of at least a few others.  Even if you think its possible for a mortal to truly be an unaccountable owner, here Musk is a steward.
My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!



[Image: homeownership.png]
My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.
Reply

(This post was last modified: 11-22-2022, 09:53 PM by Jags. Edited 1 time in total.)

(11-22-2022, 01:19 PM)mikesez Wrote:
(11-22-2022, 01:07 PM)homebiscuit Wrote: However, I have to give Mike credit because my post achieved his other goal; making the thread about him.

Good job, Mike!

FSG made the thread about me when he said my head was pointed.  Up to that point it was about Elon Musk owning Twitter.

(11-22-2022, 12:54 PM)flsprtsgod Wrote: Stewardship is irrelevant to this discussion. Moving along...

Stewardship will suddenly be very relevant if Twitter goes bankrupt and BofA gets paid back pennies on the dollar...

So… post #239 on page 11 or 12 is what made it about you?
Reply

(This post was last modified: 11-22-2022, 10:00 PM by mikesez. Edited 1 time in total.)

(11-22-2022, 09:52 PM)Jags Wrote:
(11-22-2022, 01:19 PM)mikesez Wrote: FSG made the thread about me when he said my head was pointed.  Up to that point it was about Elon Musk owning Twitter.


Stewardship will suddenly be very relevant if Twitter goes bankrupt and BofA gets paid back pennies on the dollar...

So… post #239 on page 11 or 12 is what made it about you?

Yup, but #212 was also about me.  Notice neither post is by me.  I don't actually like to talk about myself.
My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.
Reply


(11-22-2022, 09:59 PM)mikesez Wrote:
(11-22-2022, 09:52 PM)Jags Wrote: So… post #239 on page 11 or 12 is what made it about you?

Yup, but #212 was also about me.  Notice neither post is by me.  I don't actually like to talk about myself.

Which other posts were about you?
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!



(11-22-2022, 10:07 PM)Jags Wrote:
(11-22-2022, 09:59 PM)mikesez Wrote: Yup, but #212 was also about me.  Notice neither post is by me.  I don't actually like to talk about myself.

Which other posts were about you?

That's really it.  The thread is like 99% not about me.  It's like 10% people disagreeing with me, which is fine, and 90% I'm not even there.  It's actually been a good thread.
My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.
Reply

(This post was last modified: 11-22-2022, 10:42 PM by Jags. Edited 2 times in total.)

(11-22-2022, 10:19 PM)mikesez Wrote:
(11-22-2022, 10:07 PM)Jags Wrote: Which other posts were about you?

That's really it.  The thread is like 99% not about me.  It's like 10% people disagreeing with me, which is fine, and 90% I'm not even there.  It's actually been a good thread.

I was going to get to the math, actually.  It’s actually 99.2%. So it’s not about you then?  Carry on.
Reply


(11-22-2022, 02:58 PM)mikesez Wrote:
(11-22-2022, 02:33 PM)KingIngram052787 Wrote: The entire point you're making, in the context of this thread and Elon Musk owning or "owning" Twitter, is pedantic.  I'm just making a factual statement as I get dumber reading this stupid argument.

The question of ownership or stewardship is a deep question of worldview.  
But the number of banks that are along for this ride is pedantic when the point is, Musk isn't in this alone.  Regardless of if one or two or ten commercial banks are in this with him, the plays he is making affect the fortunes of at least a few others.  Even if you think its possible for a mortal to truly be an unaccountable owner, here Musk is a steward.

The question of ownership versus stewardship may be deep for you, but it's fairly simple for the rest of us.  

There are clear and distinct differences between the two, with varying legal and fiduciary responsibilities.   For the purposes of this discussion (and so many others), perhaps it would be best if you just accepted the definitions recognized by everyone else on the planet.
When you get into the endzone, act like you've been there before.
Reply




Users browsing this thread:
2 Guest(s)

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.


ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!