The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Elon Musk now owns Twitter
|
(11-29-2022, 10:36 AM)mikesez Wrote: I'm not expecting much in terms of surprises from Musk's revelations. I don't think he's going to reveal how the algorithm and shadowbanning and throttling have worked. Because every indication is Musk still wants to use those tools behind the curtain. Right wing moderators at Twitter? We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!
(11-29-2022, 10:58 AM)homebiscuit Wrote:(11-29-2022, 10:36 AM)mikesez Wrote: I'm not expecting much in terms of surprises from Musk's revelations. I don't think he's going to reveal how the algorithm and shadowbanning and throttling have worked. Because every indication is Musk still wants to use those tools behind the curtain. Obviously he's never been on Twitter. (11-29-2022, 10:58 AM)homebiscuit Wrote:(11-29-2022, 10:36 AM)mikesez Wrote: I'm not expecting much in terms of surprises from Musk's revelations. I don't think he's going to reveal how the algorithm and shadowbanning and throttling have worked. Because every indication is Musk still wants to use those tools behind the curtain. My point is they probably existed at a low level, and were simply overruled. I can't imagine any organization having total homogeneity in this. Even if the dispute was between a hyper-woke moderator and a simply liberal moderator, there should be evidence of these kinds of internal discussions, and it might be very interesting.
My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.
(11-29-2022, 12:14 PM)mikesez Wrote:(11-29-2022, 10:58 AM)homebiscuit Wrote: Right wing moderators at Twitter? Low level?!? How about damn near non-existant? Now that I've actually took the time to read some of your posts, I now know why people get so upset with you. You just spew garbage out of the corner of your mouth with absolutely ZERO facts. You don't do any research and you are nothing but a contrarian. I'm going back to ignoring your garbage now.. Your content = Diarrhea
11-29-2022, 01:52 PM
(This post was last modified: 11-29-2022, 01:55 PM by NewJagsCity. Edited 2 times in total.)
(11-29-2022, 10:58 AM)homebiscuit Wrote:(11-29-2022, 10:36 AM)mikesez Wrote: I'm not expecting much in terms of surprises from Musk's revelations. I don't think he's going to reveal how the algorithm and shadowbanning and throttling have worked. Because every indication is Musk still wants to use those tools behind the curtain. "And in other news today, the Earth was discovered to indeed be flat after all"..
"Remember Red, Hope is a good thing. Maybe the best of things. And no good thing ever dies." - Andy Dufresne, The Shawshank Redemption
We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!
(11-29-2022, 12:14 PM)mikesez Wrote:(11-29-2022, 10:58 AM)homebiscuit Wrote: Right wing moderators at Twitter? You actually think they hired right wing conservatives to work around all those wokesters at Twitter? ![]()
What in the Wide Wide World of Sports is agoin' on here???
(11-29-2022, 02:42 PM)Bchbunnie4 Wrote:(11-29-2022, 12:14 PM)mikesez Wrote: My point is they probably existed at a low level, and were simply overruled. I can't imagine any organization having total homogeneity in this. Even if the dispute was between a hyper-woke moderator and a simply liberal moderator, there should be evidence of these kinds of internal discussions, and it might be very interesting. I actually think they complied with federal employment law and didn't ask about political views in the hiring process! Don't you think we would have heard of a lawsuit by now, if they had not?
My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.
(11-29-2022, 02:54 PM)mikesez Wrote:(11-29-2022, 02:42 PM)Bchbunnie4 Wrote: You actually think they hired right wing conservatives to work around all those wokesters at Twitter? Yeah, there’s no way of ever getting around that kind of thing. ![]()
What in the Wide Wide World of Sports is agoin' on here???
We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today! (11-29-2022, 02:54 PM)mikesez Wrote:(11-29-2022, 02:42 PM)Bchbunnie4 Wrote: You actually think they hired right wing conservatives to work around all those wokesters at Twitter? It really seems to bother you that Twitter will no longer suppress conservative views.
Original Season Ticket Holder - Retired 1995 - 2020
At some point you just have to let go of what you thought should happen and live in what is happening. (11-29-2022, 04:59 PM)copycat Wrote:(11-29-2022, 02:54 PM)mikesez Wrote: I actually think they complied with federal employment law and didn't ask about political views in the hiring process! ...that's not what I've said at all. Twitter no longer suppressing conservative views doesn't bother me even a little bit. And I don't deny that they did it. Especially with regard to the transgender issue. But no matter what I say here, almost everyone thinks I actually said something else. I swear, L2L is the only one here who consistently reads what I'm actually saying. (11-29-2022, 03:03 PM)Bchbunnie4 Wrote:(11-29-2022, 02:54 PM)mikesez Wrote: I actually think they complied with federal employment law and didn't ask about political views in the hiring process! Twitter employs over 5,000 people. You're saying they successfully hired over 5,000 non-conservative people, without ever once bringing in a conservative job applicant? Or, if they did happen to interview a conservative, they managed to figure out that the applicant was conservative, and avoid hiring him or her, without asking him or her, every single time?
My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.
(11-29-2022, 05:10 PM)mikesez Wrote:(11-29-2022, 04:59 PM)copycat Wrote: It really seems to bother you that Twitter will no longer suppress conservative views. No doubt they had people who were more centrist or conservative working support roles but do you believe any of them had any control over moderation and content? We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today! (11-29-2022, 05:53 PM)homebiscuit Wrote:(11-29-2022, 05:10 PM)mikesez Wrote: ...that's not what I've said at all. Twitter no longer suppressing conservative views doesn't bother me even a little bit. And I don't deny that they did it. Especially with regard to the transgender issue. OK now we're making progress. We agree they were there. Are there. No, I don't believe they had control of these decisions. I imagine the only people in control started out as entry level moderators and they only got promoted to "control" if they had a clean record of only recommending right wing comments for moderation. I would bet there were at least a few low level workers flagging left wing posts, and those flags were ignored by the left wing bosses, and those workers probably got frustrated and didn't last long. I would bet there are a few paper trails in that vein.
My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.
(11-29-2022, 02:54 PM)mikesez Wrote:(11-29-2022, 02:42 PM)Bchbunnie4 Wrote: You actually think they hired right wing conservatives to work around all those wokesters at Twitter? I don’t have to ask my prospective employees their political party. I just assume that if they sign up to sweat and bust their [BLEEP] off for a paycheck to feed their families that they are Republicans. So far… the ones that stay seem to all be right leaning. Just basing that off talks that happen in the truck. Black, white, purple… doesn’t matter.
(11-29-2022, 06:57 PM)mikesez Wrote:(11-29-2022, 05:53 PM)homebiscuit Wrote: No doubt they had people who were more centrist or conservative working support roles but do you believe any of them had any control over moderation and content? When people say that a movie or show is good, or bad, do you think they are also referring to the lighting technicians, catering services, grips, gaffers and such?
(11-29-2022, 07:10 PM)Jags Wrote:(11-29-2022, 02:54 PM)mikesez Wrote: I actually think they complied with federal employment law and didn't ask about political views in the hiring process! Ya know, in my 35+ years of working, I never once cared about a fellow employee's party affiliation. All I cared about was that they were pulling their own weight and finished projects and planning in a timely manner. I have no problem working with democrats, liberals, conservatives, independents.. Never mattered to me. I discriminate against the lazy and the do nothings.. We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today! (11-29-2022, 07:29 PM)WingerDinger Wrote:(11-29-2022, 07:10 PM)Jags Wrote: I don’t have to ask my prospective employees their political party. I just assume that if they sign up to sweat and bust their [BLEEP] off for a paycheck to feed their families that they are Republicans. So far… the ones that stay seem to all be right leaning. Just basing that off talks that happen in the truck. Black, white, purple… doesn’t matter. Truly, neither do I. I’m not trying to be funny on this one. A very common denominator in the guys I hire seem or come off as R’s. I don’t care. I’ll hiring anybody willing to work. I’m just sharing my experience over the last 16 or so years. Turns out, they all seem to be right leaning. Take that for what you will.
(11-29-2022, 07:44 PM)Jags Wrote:(11-29-2022, 07:29 PM)WingerDinger Wrote: Ya know, in my 35+ years of working, I never once cared about a fellow employee's party affiliation. All I cared about was that they were pulling their own weight and finished projects and planning in a timely manner. No doubt though, I agree. (11-29-2022, 07:12 PM)homebiscuit Wrote:(11-29-2022, 06:57 PM)mikesez Wrote: OK now we're making progress. We agree they were there. Are there. No. But certain actors and directors have treated their techs, grips, etc., so poorly that word gets out, right? Why do you ask?
My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.
|
Users browsing this thread: |
2 Guest(s) |
The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.