When the arguments always have the same characteristics then the issue is not the argument but rather the arguer.

No one is making you read them.

He's a mod, that's his responsibility.

---

No one is making you read them.

He's a mod, that's his responsibility.

All the more reason for him to exercise patience and refrain from personal attacks.  
I would be happy to relieve him of his duty if he doesn't want to do it right.

---

My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.

He's a mod, that's his responsibility.

All the more reason for him to exercise patience and refrain from personal attacks.  
I would be happy to relieve him of his duty if he doesn't want to do it right.

Yeah sure, why don't you ask him? I'm sure they'll mod ya. Then you can start banning yourself.

---

All the more reason for him to exercise patience and refrain from personal attacks.  
I would be happy to relieve him of his duty if he doesn't want to do it right.

Yeah sure, why don't you ask him? I'm sure they'll mod ya. Then you can start banning yourself.

He'd get a warning, along with Americus and you.
Nothing personal!

---

My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.

He's a mod, that's his responsibility.

All the more reason for him to exercise patience and refrain from personal attacks.  
I would be happy to relieve him of his duty if he doesn't want to do it right.

There's the hubris again. Winger is mean, Americus is ignorant, I don't Mod right...everything is always about how people who refuse to placate your nonsense are wrong. Sorry friend, the rules in this forum are more lax, so if you can't take it maybe you should head on over to Fargin's or something.

---

Yeah sure, why don't you ask him? I'm sure they'll mod ya. Then you can start banning yourself.

He'd get a warning, along with Americus and you.
Nothing personal!

Moderating isn't personal and you know it.

---

“An empty vessel makes the loudest sound, so they that have the least wit are the greatest babblers.”. - Plato

All the more reason for him to exercise patience and refrain from personal attacks.  
I would be happy to relieve him of his duty if he doesn't want to do it right.

There's the hubris again. Winger is mean, Americus is ignorant, I don't Mod right...everything is always about how people who refuse to placate your nonsense are wrong. Sorry friend, the rules in this forum are more lax, so if you can't take it maybe you should head on over to Fargin's or something.

You can "refuse to placate my nonsense" all you want, by ignoring me, or attacking my arguments and logic. You can even be mean while you do it.  That's not the problem. The problem is you make it personal.  It's petty.  

And I didn't call Americus ignorant.  She's not. I said there were certain things she doesn't know, and there are.  And I only said that because she trashed me first.  I only ever say things like that when worse is said to me first.

---

My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.

Well I'm sure glad being mean isn't censored like swearing..

"Jeezus Mike.. [MEAN TEXT] you [MEAN TEXT] [MEAN TEXT] and [MEAN TEXT] the horse you rode in on"

You would would have to decrypt everything said to ya lolol

Come on, dood lol

---

Yeah, none of that's true, homie.

No one cares what you think.

That's as personal as it gets, homie.  Hope you were wearing gloves when you typed it, otherwise my scent will be on you for days.

---

Well I'm sure glad being mean isn't censored like swearing..

"Jeezus Mike.. [MEAN TEXT] you [MEAN TEXT] [MEAN TEXT] and [MEAN TEXT] the horse you rode in on"

You would would have to decrypt everything said to ya lolol

Come on, dood lol

Don't be ridiculous.
What you wrote above is personal.
That shouldn't be acceptable. 
Instead try, 
"That's a [BLEEP] argument and no one with half a [BLEEP] brain would ever buy that"
See the difference? Attack the argument, not the man.

---

My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.

No one cares what you think.

That's as personal as it gets, homie.  Hope you were wearing gloves when you typed it, otherwise the scent will be on you for days.

Why would anyone care what you say? You openly admitted that you were a contrarian. You can't argue valid points with a contrarian..

And so what if nobody cares what you think? Nobody cares what I say either.. Even me sometimes lolol

Thicker skin, dude..

---

That's as personal as it gets, homie.  Hope you were wearing gloves when you typed it, otherwise the scent will be on you for days.

Why would anyone care what you say? You openly admitted that you were a contrarian. You can't argue valid points with a contrarian..

And so what if nobody cares what you think? Nobody cares what I say either.. Even me sometimes lolol

Thicker skin, dude..

A lot of the guys who made it into the history books were contrarians, man.  You don't have to like it or pay attention to it, but it's really not even a valid personal attack to call me this.  "I'm going to ignore you because you're in the same category as Martin Luther and Socrates!" OK. You do you. Notice if you scroll back I wasn't even offended at first. 

It's when FSG and Americus decided to pile on that this went sideways. Because at first you were just speaking for yourself, then they piled on in a more general sense.

Anyways, all y'all get warnings.

---

My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.

Why would anyone care what you say? You openly admitted that you were a contrarian. You can't argue valid points with a contrarian..

And so what if nobody cares what you think? Nobody cares what I say either.. Even me sometimes lolol

Thicker skin, dude..

A lot of the guys who made it into the history books were contrarians, man.  You don't have to like it or pay attention to it, but it's really not even a valid personal attack to call me this.  "I'm going to ignore you because you're in the same category as Martin Luther and Socrates!" OK. You do you. Notice if you scroll back I wasn't even offended at first. 

It's when FSG and Americus decided to pile on that this went sideways. Because at first you were just speaking for yourself, then they piled on in a more general sense.

Anyways, all y'all get warnings.

Well, as long as you're handing out warnings, give me two, just in case I lose one.. Or better yet, give me 3. Pay it forward. That way when I make fun of ya again, it's like money in the bank and the bills already paid..

---

No one cares what you think.

That's as personal as it gets, homie.  Hope you were wearing gloves when you typed it, otherwise my scent will be on you for days.

---

Well I'm sure glad being mean isn't censored like swearing..

"Jeezus Mike.. [MEAN TEXT] you [MEAN TEXT] [MEAN TEXT] and [MEAN TEXT] the horse you rode in on"

You would would have to decrypt everything said to ya lolol

Come on, dood lol

Don't be ridiculous.
What you wrote above is personal.
That shouldn't be acceptable. 
Instead try, 
"That's a [BLEEP] argument and no one with half a [BLEEP] brain would ever buy that"
See the difference? Attack the argument, not the man.

I see you can't tell the difference between posting and moderating. That's a shame.

---

There's the hubris again. Winger is mean, Americus is ignorant, I don't Mod right...everything is always about how people who refuse to placate your nonsense are wrong. Sorry friend, the rules in this forum are more lax, so if you can't take it maybe you should head on over to Fargin's or something.

You can "refuse to placate my nonsense" all you want, by ignoring me, or attacking my arguments and logic. You can even be mean while you do it.  That's not the problem. The problem is you make it personal.  It's petty.  

And I didn't call Americus ignorant.  She's not. I said there were certain things she doesn't know, and there are.  And I only said that because she trashed me first.  I only ever say things like that when worse is said to me first.

No, see, you don't get to say what other people have to do. And by refusing to bow to your demands we're "refusing to placate your nonsense" and it really peevs you. That's why you can't stop crying about it.

---

“An empty vessel makes the loudest sound, so they that have the least wit are the greatest babblers.”. - Plato

That's as personal as it gets, homie.  Hope you were wearing gloves when you typed it, otherwise my scent will be on you for days.

---

Don't be ridiculous.
What you wrote above is personal.
That shouldn't be acceptable. 
Instead try, 
"That's a [BLEEP] argument and no one with half a [BLEEP] brain would ever buy that"
See the difference? Attack the argument, not the man.

I see you can't tell the difference between posting and moderating. That's a shame.

---

You can "refuse to placate my nonsense" all you want, by ignoring me, or attacking my arguments and logic. You can even be mean while you do it.  That's not the problem. The problem is you make it personal.  It's petty.  

And I didn't call Americus ignorant.  She's not. I said there were certain things she doesn't know, and there are.  And I only said that because she trashed me first.  I only ever say things like that when worse is said to me first.

No, see, you don't get to say what other people have to do. And by refusing to bow to your demands we're "refusing to placate your nonsense" and it really peevs you. That's why you can't stop crying about it.

I can tell the difference between posting and moderating.  You were posting.  Moderators post in many forums all the time without incident.  But you posted something that violates any standard of moderation, and another moderator should have deleted it and warned you.

And I'm not telling you what to do.  I'm telling you there is this one thing you do that you need to stop.  That's very different.

---

My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.

lololololol

---

I see you can't tell the difference between posting and moderating. That's a shame.

---

No, see, you don't get to say what other people have to do. And by refusing to bow to your demands we're "refusing to placate your nonsense" and it really peevs you. That's why you can't stop crying about it.

I can tell the difference between posting and moderating.  You were posting.  Moderators post in many forums all the time without incident.  But you posted something that violates any standard of moderation, and another moderator should have deleted it and warned you.

And I'm not telling you what to do.  I'm telling you there is this one thing you do that you need to stop.  That's very different.

You really need to start ending your posts with "according to me." It'll help you understand why no one cares what you write. It must really suck when you spend so much time alienating damn near everyone and then can't figure out why no one wants to help you.

---

“An empty vessel makes the loudest sound, so they that have the least wit are the greatest babblers.”. - Plato

I can tell the difference between posting and moderating.  You were posting.  Moderators post in many forums all the time without incident.  But you posted something that violates any standard of moderation, and another moderator should have deleted it and warned you.

And I'm not telling you what to do.  I'm telling you there is this one thing you do that you need to stop.  That's very different.

You really need to start ending your posts with "according to me." It'll help you understand why no one cares what you write. It must really suck when you spend so much time alienating damn near everyone and then can't figure out why no one wants to help you.

Ole Moderator Mikesez says he's got sumthin for ya lololol

---

https://twitter.com/EynoufElizabeth/stat...3Z9AQ&s=19

Hero..

---

You really need to start ending your posts with "according to me." It'll help you understand why no one cares what you write. It must really suck when you spend so much time alienating damn near everyone and then can't figure out why no one wants to help you.

Ole Moderator Mikesez says he's got sumthin for ya lololol

It's kind of expected that his type would use coercion and force to get his way; that's why he wouldn't make a very good Moderator. Glad to see our warnings already expired though.

---

“An empty vessel makes the loudest sound, so they that have the least wit are the greatest babblers.”. - Plato

I can tell the difference between posting and moderating.  You were posting.  Moderators post in many forums all the time without incident.  But you posted something that violates any standard of moderation, and another moderator should have deleted it and warned you.

And I'm not telling you what to do.  I'm telling you there is this one thing you do that you need to stop.  That's very different.

You really need to start ending your posts with "according to me." It'll help you understand why no one cares what you write. It must really suck when you spend so much time alienating damn near everyone and then can't figure out why no one wants to help you.

No one else here prefaces their comments with "according to me"
The "no personal attacks" rule is for everyone to follow equally.
Your proposed rule is singling me out.

---

Ole Moderator Mikesez says he's got sumthin for ya lololol

It's kind of expected that his type would use coercion and force to get his way; that's why he wouldn't make a very good Moderator. Glad to see our warnings already expired though.

What are you even talking about?
Was it not coercion when you deleted my post last month for profanity filter avoidance?
Mods warn, and then they delete posts, and then they ban.  They avoid coercion, and then they coerce, and then they coerce some more.  It's not complicated.

---

My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.

You really need to start ending your posts with "according to me." It'll help you understand why no one cares what you write. It must really suck when you spend so much time alienating damn near everyone and then can't figure out why no one wants to help you.

No one else here prefaces their comments with "according to me"
The "no personal attacks" rule is for everyone to follow equally.
Your proposed rule is singling me out.

Lol, it's not a proposed rule, it's a suggestion so that you can remember exactly why people respond to you the way they do. Everything with you is about rules and control (as long as they're your rules and you in control), it's really sad that you can't see your problem as well as everyone else can.

---

“An empty vessel makes the loudest sound, so they that have the least wit are the greatest babblers.”. - Plato