(10-24-2018, 11:55 AM)Upper Wrote:

(10-24-2018, 11:36 AM)jessepeck1213 Wrote: You're honestly the worst. If something doesn't fit your narrative you try and spin stuff any way you can to not admit being wrong. I've seen you post like 25 separate times that last year Fowler lucked into his sacks because they didnt match his pressures. Now it's a stat from favorite place to pick stats from, pff, saying that he is getting pressures at the same rate as yannick, and your know it all ego still wont give the tiniest bit of praise.

I actually ignored this thread while he was chilling on the milk carton for a month. I could have fit the narrative every week for a month if I wanted, but I don't have one.

All I did was laugh at how other people also ignored the thread while he wasn't doing anything, and then as soon as a speck of good happens it must be revived. If anyone has a narrative it's those guys that let the thread live and die based on how he did week to week.

The player literally disproved your latest attempt (out of dozens of them) to claim he was less of a talent than you wish to portray him to be.  He's proved your pressures per snap claims wrong -  and you're scrabbling away from your position now that it's discredited. You were wrong. 

Fowler is probably going to get a very sizeable contract to rush the passer elsewhere next year and all of your bashing of the guy will begin to look even dumber. 

It's really not that difficult to say you might have been wrong about a player.  I've been wrong about at least 40% of the players I've advocated as draft picks. It's not a big deal.

---