(02-15-2019, 01:01 PM)NYC4jags Wrote:

(02-15-2019, 12:55 PM)Cleatwood Wrote: Totally agree.

I really want Haskins because I believe he gives the Jags the best chance at consistent success (8-10 years) but if it's Foles, I'll get behind it.

Dream scenario is the Foles market continues to flame out and Jags get him on a three year deal affordably. (similar to the Bortles extension in dollars) 
Then the giants decide to wait till 2020 to draft a QB and the Jags select Haskins at #7 and sit him until Foles struggles or DH is ready to supplant him.  They could trade Foles in 2020 to clear space for Ngakoue/Ramsey deals.

Now that would be a very interesting scenerio. Would the Jags pick Haskins or try to immediately help out Foles (and the offense)? Personally, I'd have a hard time picking between Haskins or
a wide receiver like Metcalf. Since Caldwell doesn't have much time on his side, I believe he would side with Metcalf or the best offensive tackle. Ultimately, it will be Coughlin who makes that decision. Another option would be to trade back slightly to a team which covets Haskins. That way they could still get Metcalf and an additional high pick this year and/or next. I'd take my chances with an offense of:

Foles
Fournette
Metcalf
Westbrook
Lee/Chark
Hockenson/Fant

Speculation like this is what makes this time of year fun.

---