Create Account


Board Performance Issues We are aware of performance issues on the board and are working to resolve them! The board may be intermittently unavailable during this time. (May 07) x


The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Rourke deserves to get a shot at the 2s after that performance.


(09-01-2023, 09:21 AM)TheDuke007 Wrote:
(08-31-2023, 09:49 PM)ChrisJagBoy Wrote: not gonna lie, really dislike letting Rourke go, had he stuck around and went off next year in preseason we mighta got a trade for him.

He's still on the team (practice squad).  The question is whether he remains.  As I stated earlier, another team could sign him to their 53 man roster and if Rourke wants to go, we can't stop him.

The good thing is that quarterbacks aren't "plug and play".  It's a position where its very important to know the play book.  As such, many teams will turn to their own practice squad quarterback when injuries occur instead of plucking one off of another team.

Two players from the practice squad can also be promoted to the active roster each week without counting against the 53 man roster and will automatically revert back to the practice squad the day following the game without having to release them and let them go through the normal waiver process, but you can only do this for three games over the course of the season for any individual player. 

If you activate that player for a fourth game, they will count against the 53 man roster and you will be required to pay them an active player salary for a minimum of 3 weeks. After that, you would have to release them and let them go through waiver process before you could sign the back to the PS.

I'm not sure if you can declare the player active for the next game on a Monday or not, but it might give you a way to fully protect a PS player for three weeks at least.

Also if someone else tries to sign a PS player, I would imagine you would have a chance to match or give them a better offer and promote them to the active roster if you really wanted to keep them.
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!



(09-01-2023, 10:30 AM)Predator Wrote:
(09-01-2023, 09:21 AM)TheDuke007 Wrote: He's still on the team (practice squad).  The question is whether he remains.  As I stated earlier, another team could sign him to their 53 man roster and if Rourke wants to go, we can't stop him.

The good thing is that quarterbacks aren't "plug and play".  It's a position where its very important to know the play book.  As such, many teams will turn to their own practice squad quarterback when injuries occur instead of plucking one off of another team.

Two players from the practice squad can also be promoted to the active roster each week without counting against the 53 man roster and will automatically revert back to the practice squad the day following the game without having to release them and let them go through the normal waiver process, but you can only do this for three games over the course of the season for any individual player. 

If you activate that player for a fourth game, they will count against the 53 man roster and you will be required to pay them an active player salary for a minimum of 3 weeks. After that, you would have to release them and let them go through waiver process before you could sign the back to the PS.

I'm not sure if you can declare the player active for the next game on a Monday or not, but it might give you a way to fully protect a PS player for three weeks at least.

Also if someone else tries to sign a PS player, I would imagine you would have a chance to match or give them a better offer and promote them to the active roster if you really wanted to keep them.

Good Info !!!  Thanks
Reply


(08-31-2023, 10:48 PM)Eric1 Wrote:
(08-31-2023, 09:49 PM)ChrisJagBoy Wrote: not gonna lie, really dislike letting Rourke go, had he stuck around and went off next year in preseason we mighta got a trade for him.

lol hes on our PS..

I'm aware, based on how he performed i'd be shocked if another team dosen't snag him eventually.
Reply

(This post was last modified: 09-01-2023, 11:00 PM by Eric1.)

(09-01-2023, 10:42 PM)ChrisJagBoy Wrote:
(08-31-2023, 10:48 PM)Eric1 Wrote: lol hes on our PS..

I'm aware, based on how he performed i'd be shocked if another team dosen't snag him eventually.

If a team was going to snag him, why wouldn't they have put in a claim for him?

He isn't going anywhere but if he does, big whoop.
Reply




Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.


ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!