03-05-2017, 03:17 AM
03-05-2017, 03:23 AM
Quote:Thats over rated. Cook played top level talent and smoked um.Dalvin Cook vs. Clemson smoked um
Dalvin Cook vs. Florida cook second half smoked um 2015
Dalvin Cook vs Florida 2016 smoked um
Dalvin Cook (Florida State) vs. Michigan bowl smoked um
And we can go on and on. Combine don't take away from explosiveness.
03-05-2017, 03:43 AM
A really good guy as far as informational scouting videos. . So take your pick
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=27ortq29_UU Fournette
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oal9T61thY0 Cook
Both be a great choice. But still think based on our offense. Cook is a better fit.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=27ortq29_UU Fournette
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oal9T61thY0 Cook
Both be a great choice. But still think based on our offense. Cook is a better fit.
03-05-2017, 08:05 AM
I'm starting to think both are overrated.
So my answer is, neither.
So my answer is, neither.
03-05-2017, 08:55 AM
Cook's bad showing in these drills isn't surprising at all to me. I've always believed that he's had a stiff running style.
03-05-2017, 10:30 PM
Mixon is better than both of them. We better take him in the 2nd or 3rd otherwise Jerruh Jones is gonna scoop him up and have 2 All Pro backs behind the best line in the league.
03-06-2017, 08:45 PM
Quote:Cook's bad showing in these drills isn't surprising at all to me. I've always believed that he's had a stiff running style.
<a class="bbc_url" href='http://m.imgur.com/6mrtvZb?r'>http://m.imgur.com/6mrtvZb?r</a>
03-06-2017, 08:48 PM
Quote:<a class="bbc_url" href='http://m.imgur.com/6mrtvZb?r'>http://m.imgur.com/6mrtvZb?r</a>
Honestly hope he falls to our 2nd round pick. Take Adams in the 1st.
03-06-2017, 08:49 PM
Quote:I'm starting to think both are overrated.The only thing overrated is the combine. Don't let a couple of drills that doesn't have anything to do with actually playing football fool you from actual game tape. This rule of thought applies to those who both "underwhelm" and those who "excel" at the combine.
So my answer is, neither.
03-06-2017, 08:57 PM
Quote:<a class="bbc_url" href='http://m.imgur.com/6mrtvZb?r'>http://m.imgur.com/6mrtvZb?r</a>
This gif doesn't dispute what I said. He scored but still looks stiff.
03-06-2017, 09:05 PM
Quote:The only thing overrated is the combine. Don't let a couple of drills that doesn't have anything to do with actually playing football fool you from actual game tape. This rule of thought applies to those who both "underwhelm" and those who "excel" at the combine.They did confirm though...Fournette's poor vertical is evidenced by his lack of explosion and need for a runway in cutups, and Cook's lack of agility shows up with his rounding off cuts like in that GIF you linked.
03-06-2017, 09:07 PM
Quote:They did confirm though...Fournette's poor vertical is evidenced by his lack of explosion and need for a runway in cutups, and Cook's lack of agility shows up with his rounding off cuts like in that GIF you linked.What did McCaffrey's drills show?
03-06-2017, 09:10 PM
Quote:What did McCaffrey's drills show?That he's really good. Still not #4 worthy though.
03-06-2017, 09:18 PM
Quote:That he's really good. Still not #4 worthy though.If Fred Taylor was in this draft would you draft him at 4?
03-06-2017, 09:23 PM
Quote:If Fred Taylor was in this draft would you draft him at 4?He would be in the acceptable tier yeah, but not above Garrett Thomas Adams Lattimore or maybe Hooker assuming they all pass medicals.
03-06-2017, 09:29 PM
Quote:He would be in the acceptable tier yeah, but not above Garrett Thomas Adams Lattimore or maybe Hooker assuming they all pass medicals.Please slap yourself one time! Thanks!
03-06-2017, 10:07 PM
Quote:This gif doesn't dispute what I said. He scored but still looks stiff.
That is just some of the absolute worst tackling I have ever seen
03-06-2017, 10:20 PM
Cook's combine workout was a big let down. I would not want him at #4. McCaffrey looked amazing, I'd rather trade back and get him or trade back into the 1st to get him.
03-06-2017, 10:28 PM
Quote:If Fred Taylor was in this draft would you draft him at 4?
Fred Taylor didn't have enough groin flexion, and he didn't have as good of a Spider chart as Mike Doss.
03-07-2017, 04:30 AM
Quote:That he's really good. Still not #4 worthy though.
Ten bench presses? That was poor.