03-03-2014, 11:35 AM
Also wouldn't the fact that Manziel had a bad defense actually help his numbers? He gets more possessions and he has to throw the ball all the time to catch up.
Quote:Also wouldn't the fact that Manziel had a bad defense actually help his numbers? He gets more possessions and he has to throw the ball all the time to catch up.Wouldn't having a good defense (like TB had) also mean you are getting the ball back a lot as well....
Quote:All I have heard is TB excels in pre-snap reads and can adjust to what he sees the defense is doing. If that is the case, even if the staff is conservative with the play calling, is he unable to read a defense to know when to not run a running play?Pre Snap read does not always mean changing a run play to a pass play or a pass play to a run play, it also means finding the right match up in the pass play, changing a pass play to another pass play, giving your WR a hot route and then making the right throw and attacking the right matchups, its a whole lot of other things that go into that.
Either he excels in pre snap reads and adjusting the play call or he doesn't, which one is it?
Also there are other teams run pro style offense and they still rank higher (some much higher) than Bridgewater and they play in tougher conferences.....
Quote:Please explain....It forces the offense to stay aggresive and play catch up at times. That is why they had so many high scoring games.
I could understand your reasoning if we were just talking about yards, but I am referring to points scored in red zone, offensive TDs scored period, and red zone attempts.....
How does having a bad defense inflate Manziel's numbers?
Quote:Pre Snap read does not always mean changing a run play to a pass play or a pass play to a run play, it also means finding the right match up in the pass play, changing a pass play to another pass play, giving your WR a hot route and then making the right throw and attacking the right matchups, its a whole lot of other things that go into that.
If Bridgewater just goes up there and change run plays to pass plays just to pad his stats and not run the offense the coaches put in that would be a knock on him that he does his own thing.
Quote:It forces the offense to stay aggresive and play catch up at times. That is why they had so many high scoring games.
Quote:Wouldn't having a good defense (like TB had) also mean you are getting the ball back a lot as well....72 plays to 74 plays huh? Well how many passing attempts did Manziel have compared to Teddy?
More references <a class="bbc_url" href='http://www.footballoutsiders.com/stats/feioff'>http://www.footballoutsiders.com/stats/feioff</a><a class="bbc_url" href='http://www.teamrankings.com/college-football/stat/plays-per-game'>http://www.teamrankings.com/college-football/stat/plays-per-game</a>
Louisville ran 71.4 offensive plays per game and Texas A&M ran 73.8..... So this talk about Johnny get way more chances is bogus, he is more efficient at scoring points.
Quote:72 plays to 74 plays huh? Well how many passing attempts did Manziel have compared to Teddy?
Quote:Manziel had 429 and Bridgewater had 427 passing attempts.....So was RG3 better than Luck in college?
LOL....again Manziel is the more efficient scorer......
Quote:So was RG3 better than Luck in college?I don't have charts for their red zone scoring, red zone attempts, offensive TDs, and offensive posessions...but I think they were closer than what the stats show for TB and Manziel or it was in favor of Luck...
Quote:Manziel had 429 and Bridgewater had 427 passing attempts.....
LOL....again Manziel is the more efficient scorer......
Quote:I don't have charts for their red zone scoring, red zone attempts, and offensive TDs.....but I think they were closer than what the stats show for TB and Manziel or it was in favor of Luck...By your theories, RG3 was a better qb than Luck coming out
You are welcome to look it up if that's the point you want to prove...
Quote:I don't have charts for their red zone scoring, red zone attempts, offensive TDs, and offensive posessions...but I think they were closer than what the stats show for TB and Manziel or it was in favor of Luck...Hahaha that means you already looked it up. You already know RG3 had better college stats than Luck but you know that it doesn't help your argument,
You are welcome to look it up if that's the point you want to prove...
Quote:By your theories, RG3 was a better qb than Luck coming out
Quote:Hahaha that means you already looked it up. You already know RG3 had better college stats than Luck but you know that it doesn't help your argument,
If we base everything off college stats then Timmy Chang should be the best QB in the NFL.
Quote:Hahaha that means you already looked it up. You already know RG3 had better college stats than Luck but you know that it doesn't help your argument,
If we base everything off college stats then Timmy Chang should be the best QB in the NFL.
Quote:<a class="bbc_url" href='http://athlonsports.com/nfl/andrew-luck-vs-robert-griffin-iii'>http://athlonsports.com/nfl/andrew-luck-vs-robert-griffin-iii</a>
First one I found and it sounds an awful lot like Teddy vs Manziel. Especially with the rushing number, playmakers on both teams and the offense they ran in college.
Quote:Manziel had 429 and Bridgewater had 427 passing attempts.....
LOL....again Manziel is the more efficient scorer......