Jacksonville Jaguars Fan Forums

Full Version: More Context to the Ramsey trade
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
(04-24-2020, 09:56 AM)Jagwired Wrote: [ -> ]Were the Jags to continue paying that [BLEEP] while he faked injury?

I think the major part of the hostility to my point is the absolutely polarizing nature of Ramsey.  I get the hostility to the guy/

But to the very best of my knowledge, tKhalil Mack did not engage in any of the behavior exhibited by Ramsey, and got a similar return in trade.

I would be similarly critical of the Raiders for botching the picks. 

They got Abrams, the Miss. State S last year who played very little, and they got Damon Arnette this year.

So far, the ROI from those picks appears minimal.

Take the personality out of it.  View it from the lens of a pure talent exchange.

A difficult task, I get it.
(04-24-2020, 09:52 AM)Cleatwood Wrote: [ -> ]
(04-23-2020, 11:47 PM)flgatorsandjags Wrote: [ -> ]Browns got a 1st for Trent Richardson.  You act like you already know what type of career Chaisson is gonna have and its a failed pick lol
You literally called him Arden Key 3 weeks ago.... your attitude has only changed because he’s a Jag.

Its definitely not who I wanted but he's 20 with and a high upside like Key and Mingo were.  I'm gonna see what he does before I say its a bad pick
All the pining for sweet Jalen is ludicrous. [BLEEP] quit on his team and the city, faked an injury to not play and cried until he got out.

I'd be happy if we got a slimy fetch ball for his [BLEEP] [BLEEP]. [BLEEP] Ramsey
(04-24-2020, 09:52 AM)Cleatwood Wrote: [ -> ]
(04-23-2020, 11:47 PM)flgatorsandjags Wrote: [ -> ]Browns got a 1st for Trent Richardson.  You act like you already know what type of career Chaisson is gonna have and its a failed pick lol
You literally called him Arden Key 3 weeks ago.... your attitude has only changed because he’s a Jag.

Aldon Smith was the same type of guy who turned out to be a great player he just had off field issues.  Another pick on potential like Chark and Bryan were
(04-24-2020, 10:02 AM)Kane Wrote: [ -> ]I don't get the dislike of either pick really. Henderson was highly regarded, even if a few board posters who know jack about diddly didn't like him. He's a cover corner with suspect tackling, but we don't need him to tackle we need him to cover. And I remember a knock on Ramsey being no INTs, then he was catching some INTs in the NFL so maybe we should take a beat and calm down a bit.
As per the pick at 20... any pick at 20, no matter who they were, wasn't going to be an equal value to the talent of Ramsey. However, we got an edge rusher who is actually good vs the run and can drop into coverage. The team has recently noted that we'd have a few more 34 looks so perhaps we'll see him used a bit like a chess piece. So now we have a possible replacement to Yan, and if nothing else a replacement for Fowler. The Ramsey trade didn't only net us the 20 pick, it netted us a 2021 first rounder and 4th rounder as well. So there is no telling who we get with those picks.... But 3 players for 1 player that doesn't want to be here is always a win, imo.

We now have a legit #1 CB and we have another pass rusher. Ramsey was a hell of a talent. But the compensation was great for a player who was done here and had no intention of resigning. If we can move Yan for a 2021 first at this point, I'd be good with that too.

Did the first round land exactly like anyone wanted it? Doubtful... Everyone has their favorite players and the way they want the draft to go. But I think it's a very good start at a rebuild.

I give you credit for your response.  Though I disagree with many of your conclusions and some of the reasoning behind it, you at least approached your answer from a purely football perspective as opposed to letting personality dictate your response.  As for Henderson's deficiencies and your statement that he's being paid to cover, not tackle, I agree that is his primary purpose.  But you better believe if any dispute arises between he and the team, fans here will be the very first to use his lack of tackling prowess as a justification to rail against him.  Yan is an edge rusher.  He's was drafted to rush the passer.  He has been very good at it and now wants to be rewarded for it.  Before his holdout, the majority of the board wanted to re-sign him.  Now?  All anyone talks about in analyzing him as a football player is his run defense.  I'm excluding his twitter beef.  Everyone agrees he didn't handle that well.  But I'm talking specifically as a football player.

I think another thing lost on all of this is we have had two prominent players on our team get so pissed with the front office the differences became irreconcilable.

Does this concern ANY of you?!?
(04-24-2020, 10:04 AM)enigma Wrote: [ -> ]
(04-24-2020, 10:02 AM)Kane Wrote: [ -> ]I don't get the dislike of either pick really. Henderson was highly regarded, even if a few board posters who know jack about diddly didn't like him. He's a cover corner with suspect tackling, but we don't need him to tackle we need him to cover. And I remember a knock on Ramsey being no INTs, then he was catching some INTs in the NFL so maybe we should take a beat and calm down a bit.
As per the pick at 20... any pick at 20, no matter who they were, wasn't going to be an equal value to the talent of Ramsey. However, we got an edge rusher who is actually good vs the run and can drop into coverage. The team has recently noted that we'd have a few more 34 looks so perhaps we'll see him used a bit like a chess piece. So now we have a possible replacement to Yan, and if nothing else a replacement for Fowler. The Ramsey trade didn't only net us the 20 pick, it netted us a 2021 first rounder and 4th rounder as well. So there is no telling who we get with those picks.... But 3 players for 1 player that doesn't want to be here is always a win, imo.

We now have a legit #1 CB and we have another pass rusher. Ramsey was a hell of a talent. But the compensation was great for a player who was done here and had no intention of resigning. If we can move Yan for a 2021 first at this point, I'd be good with that too.

Did the first round land exactly like anyone wanted it? Doubtful... Everyone has their favorite players and the way they want the draft to go. But I think it's a very good start at a rebuild.

This post 1000000000%.

I don't know why it's so hard to follow.

Ramsey-level talent was never going to be replenished with that #20 pick - but the compensation we received for a player who checked out on his organization, team, and teammates OUTWARDLY was very surprising in a good way.

(emphasis added)

The emphasized portion is EXACTLY what I'm talking about.

By your own words, you are fine with exchanging superior talent for lesser talent.

The negative talent exchange is the problem I have with this whole thing.

(04-24-2020, 10:33 AM)flgatorsandjags Wrote: [ -> ]
(04-24-2020, 09:52 AM)Cleatwood Wrote: [ -> ]You literally called him Arden Key 3 weeks ago.... your attitude has only changed because he’s a Jag.

Its definitely not who I wanted but he's 20 with and a high upside like Key and Mingo were.  I'm gonna see what he does before I say its a bad pick

I was never a fan of Key OR Mingo.

To his credit, I see Chaisson as having a better burst than either guy, but at this point,  limited nonetheless.

I desperately hope I am proven wrong with this, but my initial impression is that we missed on this pick.
(04-24-2020, 10:55 AM)Bullseye Wrote: [ -> ]
(04-24-2020, 10:04 AM)enigma Wrote: [ -> ]This post 1000000000%.

I don't know why it's so hard to follow.

Ramsey-level talent was never going to be replenished with that #20 pick - but the compensation we received for a player who checked out on his organization, team, and teammates OUTWARDLY was very surprising in a good way.

(emphasis added)

The emphasized portion is EXACTLY what I'm talking about.

By your own words, you are fine with exchanging superior talent for lesser talent.

The negative talent exchange is the problem I have with this whole thing.
The problem with your logic is that the "talent" didn't want to be here any longer.
(04-24-2020, 10:55 AM)Bullseye Wrote: [ -> ]
(04-24-2020, 10:04 AM)enigma Wrote: [ -> ]This post 1000000000%.

I don't know why it's so hard to follow.

Ramsey-level talent was never going to be replenished with that #20 pick - but the compensation we received for a player who checked out on his organization, team, and teammates OUTWARDLY was very surprising in a good way.

(emphasis added)

The emphasized portion is EXACTLY what I'm talking about.

By your own words, you are fine with exchanging superior talent for lesser talent.

The negative talent exchange is the problem I have with this whole thing.

I don't get what you wanted them to do.  Force him to sign/play?
(04-24-2020, 10:36 AM)flgatorsandjags Wrote: [ -> ]
(04-24-2020, 09:52 AM)Cleatwood Wrote: [ -> ]You literally called him Arden Key 3 weeks ago.... your attitude has only changed because he’s a Jag.

Aldon Smith was the same type of guy who turned out to be a great player he just had off field issues.  Another pick on potential like Chark and Bryan were

If Chaisson has Aldon Smith type productivity and impact sans the off field baggage, I will absolutely and enthusiastically admit to an unprecedented and spectacular degree of wrongness in my response to the pick.  I will sing it from the mountain tops!

But I gotta say I don't think that will happen, and considering by your own words, you didn't want him, and you don't think that will happen, either.
(04-24-2020, 10:49 AM)Bullseye Wrote: [ -> ]
(04-24-2020, 10:02 AM)Kane Wrote: [ -> ]I don't get the dislike of either pick really. Henderson was highly regarded, even if a few board posters who know jack about diddly didn't like him. He's a cover corner with suspect tackling, but we don't need him to tackle we need him to cover. And I remember a knock on Ramsey being no INTs, then he was catching some INTs in the NFL so maybe we should take a beat and calm down a bit.
As per the pick at 20... any pick at 20, no matter who they were, wasn't going to be an equal value to the talent of Ramsey. However, we got an edge rusher who is actually good vs the run and can drop into coverage. The team has recently noted that we'd have a few more 34 looks so perhaps we'll see him used a bit like a chess piece. So now we have a possible replacement to Yan, and if nothing else a replacement for Fowler. The Ramsey trade didn't only net us the 20 pick, it netted us a 2021 first rounder and 4th rounder as well. So there is no telling who we get with those picks.... But 3 players for 1 player that doesn't want to be here is always a win, imo.

We now have a legit #1 CB and we have another pass rusher. Ramsey was a hell of a talent. But the compensation was great for a player who was done here and had no intention of resigning. If we can move Yan for a 2021 first at this point, I'd be good with that too.

Did the first round land exactly like anyone wanted it? Doubtful... Everyone has their favorite players and the way they want the draft to go. But I think it's a very good start at a rebuild.

I give you credit for your response.  Though I disagree with many of your conclusions and some of the reasoning behind it, you at least approached your answer from a purely football perspective as opposed to letting personality dictate your response.  As for Henderson's deficiencies and your statement that he's being paid to cover, not tackle, I agree that is his primary purpose.  But you better believe if any dispute arises between he and the team, fans here will be the very first to use his lack of tackling prowess as a justification to rail against him.  Yan is an edge rusher.  He's was drafted to rush the passer.  He has been very good at it and now wants to be rewarded for it.  Before his holdout, the majority of the board wanted to re-sign him.  Now?  All anyone talks about in analyzing him as a football player is his run defense.  I'm excluding his twitter beef.  Everyone agrees he didn't handle that well.  But I'm talking specifically as a football player.

I think another thing lost on all of this is we have had two prominent players on our team get so pissed with the front office the differences became irreconcilable.

Does this concern ANY of you?!?

Fair point... but fans gonna fan. I mean, we're all doing it 24 hrs into the draft already right? lol
Yeah Yan catches a lot of flack for not being great against the run, even though he has drastically improved in that area. I was all in on pay Yan until he went full on Ramsey on Twitter.
And you're right, many people who are good with the Henderson pick probably will do a 180 if he isn't a great player, or pulls some drama in the media and they may use his lack of tackling as an excuse as why "they never liked him" 
But my point is... maybe his tackling isn't as bad as we think... I mean, Sanders wasn't a tackler either. 

Does any of the Ramsey/Yan stuff concern me? Nah, not really. Different strokes for different folks. We knew about Ramsey's personality day 1, Yannick's thing kind of developed.
If we start to see more of it, it would start to concern me. But for every one of those guys we had some stand up dudes like AJ and Calais. Men who knew how to go about the biz. These kids have entitlement and personality issues. That's on them, not on the team.
Did the team screw up when they probably could've locked them up sooner? Sure. But that ship has sailed and I'm not going to think about how they could screw it up with the next slew of draft picks.

As it relates to on the field, I think these two selections are good for the team. As it relates to the trade, I think we got some lemonade from a lemon and we're trying to make some more with another. Talent wise? These guys were awesome for our team. And you rarely replace a developed elite talent with another right away. Henderson won't be Ramsey right away, but he should be a legit #1 CB right away, which we desperately needed. K'Lavon might need some developing or he might surprise. But he adds a solid player to a position of need if/when Yan leaves.

As per the value of the trade, like I said, we gotta see what 2021 nets us before really coming to conclusions but I'll take 3 players being solid contributors/starters over 1 elite player. Because it takes a village my man. No team ever won the superbowl because of a loud mouth HoF CB alone.
So far from the Ramsey trade we got a pass rusher and two picks in 2021, one of which could be a high first rounder. Hell... that pick could turn out to be Trevor Lawrence, if you're a fan of his, I'd assume you'd take that trade off all by itself (Ramsey for a "franchise QB")
(04-24-2020, 11:01 AM)Rico Wrote: [ -> ]
(04-24-2020, 10:55 AM)Bullseye Wrote: [ -> ](emphasis added)

The emphasized portion is EXACTLY what I'm talking about.

By your own words, you are fine with exchanging superior talent for lesser talent.

The negative talent exchange is the problem I have with this whole thing.

I don't get what you wanted them to do.  Force him to sign/play?

That and let him do whatever he wants.
(04-24-2020, 11:01 AM)Rico Wrote: [ -> ]
(04-24-2020, 10:55 AM)Bullseye Wrote: [ -> ](emphasis added)

The emphasized portion is EXACTLY what I'm talking about.

By your own words, you are fine with exchanging superior talent for lesser talent.

The negative talent exchange is the problem I have with this whole thing.

I don't get what you wanted them to do.  Force him to sign/play?

1.  Don't alienate your star level talent.

2.  If that is unavoidable and you trade the star level talent, make the most out of the pickks you get from him


The Rams were a cheap organization when thy were first in Los Angeles, and RB Eric Dickerson was constantly bickering with the team over his contract.

Finally it became unbearable for the team, and they traded him away to the Colts.

They got a huge haul fom the trade.

  
Quote: the Rams got running backs Greg Bell and Owen Gill, along with six draft picks three each from the Bills and Colts, including each teams’ first and second round picks in 1988.

Read More: Halloween, 1987: Eric Dickerson Traded To Colts | https://espn1420.com/halloween-1987-eric...m=referral



Now if 3 picks for one player who doesn't want to be here is good, then certainly the rams made out like bandits, right?

The only thing is they botched the overwhelming majority of the picks!  That trade should have set them up for success for years.  Instead, it set them up for failure.

By the fans perspective, getting rid of a player you deem to be a malcontent has value.

But I submit a talented but unhappy player is less of a headache than having a team of less talented players.
(04-24-2020, 11:16 AM)Bullseye Wrote: [ -> ]
(04-24-2020, 11:01 AM)Rico Wrote: [ -> ]I don't get what you wanted them to do.  Force him to sign/play?

1.  Don't alienate your star level talent.

2.  If that is unavoidable and you trade the star level talent, make the most out of the pickks you get from him


The Rams were a cheap organization when thy were first in Los Angeles, and RB Eric Dickerson was constantly bickering with the team over his contract.

Finally it became unbearable for the team, and they traded him away to the Colts.

They got a huge haul fom the trade.

  
Quote: the Rams got running backs Greg Bell and Owen Gill, along with six draft picks three each from the Bills and Colts, including each teams’ first and second round picks in 1988.

Read More: Halloween, 1987: Eric Dickerson Traded To Colts | https://espn1420.com/halloween-1987-eric...m=referral



Now if 3 picks for one player who doesn't want to be here is good, then certainly the rams made out like bandits, right?

The only thing is they botched the overwhelming majority of the picks!  That trade should have set them up for success for years.  Instead, it set them up for failure.

By the fans perspective, getting rid of a player you deem to be a malcontent has value.

But I submit a talented but unhappy player is less of a headache than having a team of less talented players.
And the Saints gave up a whole draft plus a 1/3 for a RB.

Trades like those don't happen anymore.
1. 'ole Tommy Coughlin is out the door and thankfully we don't have to worry about any more BS after the remnants of his senile ways of governing have been exhumed.

2. As someone who backed Ramsey almost all the way until he started the bs and checked out on his teammates, there was NO way Ramsey was playing another down for us - and the only thing our team had as a play was to ship him off. So the haul we got for him, a player who mysteriously suffered a "phantom" back injury and then miraculously overcame it with a change of scenery, was nothing short of amazing.

He was a talented player that ended up being a disgruntled, toxic player who decided to check out on his teammates and sit on the sidelines for the rest of his time here in Jax. Can't make him play and I also called it with Yannick eventually following the same playbook as Ramsey where most people were saying that he wouldn't do anything of the sort.
(04-24-2020, 10:32 AM)Bullseye Wrote: [ -> ]
(04-24-2020, 09:56 AM)Jagwired Wrote: [ -> ]Were the Jags to continue paying that [BLEEP] while he faked injury?

I think the major part of the hostility to my point is the absolutely polarizing nature of Ramsey.  I get the hostility to the guy/

But to the very best of my knowledge, tKhalil Mack did not engage in any of the behavior exhibited by Ramsey, and got a similar return in trade.

I would be similarly critical of the Raiders for botching the picks. 

They got Abrams, the Miss. State S last year who played very little, and they got Damon Arnette this year.

So far, the ROI from those picks appears minimal.

Take the personality out of it.  View it from the lens of a pure talent exchange.

A difficult task, I get it.

So is your point theoretical? Because the Raiders screwed up (and I'm sure you can come up with other examples) that means trading an All Pro player is never justified?


Whether or not you like the Chaisson pick (and I didn't) he was the top rated player on a lot of boards. The Cowboys were planning on him before Lamb fell into their laps. Caldwell has show success in drafting edge rushers, and not so much with OTs. Both Prisco and Walter gave the pick A grades (admittedly there was grade inflation from both with a lot of A's), and from NFL.com who gave the Jags a grade-inflated A overall:


Quote:Chaisson at 20 is a steal. He has the elite bend, length, get-off and strength to be a sack-master for the Jags. Getting the draft's second-best edge rusher at No. 20 does not happen very often.


We also have the Rams 2021 1st round pick. Considering their cap losses that pick could be very high, maybe even #1. Would Trevor Lawrence be adequate compensation for Ramsey (or even for Ramsey plus or 2021 1st if we had to trade up)?

Since you are ignoring the 2021 1st I can just as logically claim that we got Chaisson and "Lawrence" for Ramsey.

Are you suggesting that the Jags should have refused to trade CB who was going to pretend to be injured for the next two seasons? I'm thinking Ramsey might not have been an All Pro in those seasons of sitting on the bench, and the Jags wouldn't have been improved with an additional bench-warmer. But maybe that's just me.

To reply to your other complaints:

Ngokoue is still a Jag at this point. If the most we can get is a 2nd then I'd personally rather pass on the trade in the hope that Ngokoue caves to the huge financial loss and re-joins the squad. If we trade him for a 1st I think it's the best choice. Even if Chaisson busts out, Allen fills his role.

Kinlaw and Aiyuk aren't better. Henderson and Kinlaw are both the 2nd best at their positions with a large drop off afterwards. Either one would have been a disappointment once the top 8 were picked, and there was a run on CBs after Henderson. Aiyuk is just one of many WRs of about equal value. We can probably get Shenault in round 2 if we don't find a better non-WR prospect. I personally hope the Jags take Hightower in round 4 and Dubois in round 7 (or as a priority free agent).
Couple of things:  

Not sure you saw some of the clips of Ramsey "tackling" after he got to LA, but it wasn't just suspect, it was not just indifferent, at times it was intentionally avoiding it and letting others do something even if it resulted in 10 yards or so from the ball carrier.

Next, dude was faking an injury.  There isn't a "let him do what he wants" aspect to this, as what he wanted was to sit on the sideline.  Coughlin screwed up.  That was/is terribly concerning.   I would have cleaned house, in the FO.   That would have sent a big time message as well.  I don't know exactly why they didn't other that being oblivious at the time thinking we were going to have a chance to win this year, and then coming to a different conclusion later.

Ramsey wasn't just a problem off the field.  He was a problem on it as well.  From his tantrums, to his blowing coverages (which it is clear his mentality of not being used correctly factored into that, and now he is on a team that plays MORE zone), to his body language, to his giving 60% effort at times, then being lights out........I didn't hear a bunch of teammates standing up for him directly.

He wasn't going to play.  He made that clear, and wasn't afraid to fake an injury and get paid in the process.   


Yan on the other hand, all of his issues are this year and he is flipping outa and undoubtedly having his pride tweaked at every turn.   He isn't getting 20m per.  Very, very unlikely. I'm sure TC's approach wasn't helpful at all.  Now Caldwell is being just rather matter of fact.  I have no problem with a reconciliation if possible.  I think Yan is being an idiot, saying idiotic things, and directing those idiotic things in an idiotic direction, but a "I was wrong" that effectively blames how things started and a couple of sacks and he's fine by me, assuming he takes the deal they think is reasonable.   I can even take one of his idiotic statements to Tony Khan and think of it positively IF THIS HAPPENS.  Despite thinking he was being wronged by playing after the Charger game, he still went out and played lights out.


Ramsey was a diva, who never acted like anything but, and he was done here, and it is clear they were done with him too.  All the talent.   Not always put to use.   More like when and if he chose.  You can watch highlights of Sammy Watkins blowing by him flat footed if you want a reminder.   He was going, and had to go.  It was largely out of the team's control and they did the best they could, and got what by all accounts was a great return.   I think they did a good job of taking 2 guys who can make up that difference, and that's all you can do.
(04-24-2020, 10:36 AM)flgatorsandjags Wrote: [ -> ]
(04-24-2020, 09:52 AM)Cleatwood Wrote: [ -> ]You literally called him Arden Key 3 weeks ago.... your attitude has only changed because he’s a Jag.

Aldon Smith was the same type of guy who turned out to be a great player he just had off field issues.  Another pick on potential like Chark and Bryan were
Well Bryan is terrible but that’s not the point here.

The point is how quickly you changed after the Jags drafted Chaisson. He went from “Arden Key” to “Aldon Smith without baggage”. Lol

It’s the homer bias which is fine but at least be honest.
(04-24-2020, 11:16 AM)Bullseye Wrote: [ -> ]
(04-24-2020, 11:01 AM)Rico Wrote: [ -> ]I don't get what you wanted them to do.  Force him to sign/play?

1.  Don't alienate your star level talent.

2.  If that is unavoidable and you trade the star level talent, make the most out of the pickks you get from him


The Rams were a cheap organization when thy were first in Los Angeles, and RB Eric Dickerson was constantly bickering with the team over his contract.

Finally it became unbearable for the team, and they traded him away to the Colts.

They got a huge haul fom the trade.

  
Quote: the Rams got running backs Greg Bell and Owen Gill, along with six draft picks three each from the Bills and Colts, including each teams’ first and second round picks in 1988.

Read More: Halloween, 1987: Eric Dickerson Traded To Colts | https://espn1420.com/halloween-1987-eric...m=referral



Now if 3 picks for one player who doesn't want to be here is good, then certainly the rams made out like bandits, right?

The only thing is they botched the overwhelming majority of the picks!  That trade should have set them up for success for years.  Instead, it set them up for failure.

By the fans perspective, getting rid of a player you deem to be a malcontent has value.

But I submit a talented but unhappy player is less of a headache than having a team of less talented players.

You do know there was no salary cap in 1987...right?

Let's add to the fact that he was a malcontent and was not going to play here regardless.  Two firsts for Ramsey was a fantastic haul, especially since we don't have to pay him some ridiculous salary.  I can't say that I necessarily liked what they did with the pick they got this year.  But you cannot factor that in when the trade was made.

I can't even see how the highlighted is even relevant.  A talented and unhappy player has exactly what value when he refuses to play?
I suppose the best way to look at the Ramsey trade is to see if we get two good players versus replacing one great one. Ramsey talent doesn’t exist at that pick. Hopefully the two people that replace him contribute enough to cover for the loss, and if it does that, then they would have earned their places.
You get in a car accident that totals your car...you ran a stop sign..they ran a stop sign... you still get a new car. You need a car.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7