Jacksonville Jaguars Fan Forums

(09-12-2021, 04:22 PM)homebiscuit Wrote: [ -> ]

(09-12-2021, 04:18 PM)TheO-LineMatters Wrote: [ -> ]The good news is that we're in perfect position to draft DE Kayvon Thibadeaux. That guy is gonna be a beast and might finally allow us to get pressure on opposing QB's.

The irony of that is our biggest need and your username.

(09-12-2021, 04:33 PM)captivating Wrote: [ -> ]

(09-12-2021, 04:30 PM)raptor6581 Wrote: [ -> ]Silver linings..... Jags outscored and gave up less points than tennessee...... Lol.

Sent from my IN2017 using Tapatalk

Yep, and only 4 weeks to go before Henry puts up another 200y + game on us.

(09-12-2021, 04:34 PM)Rockman1966 Wrote: [ -> ]Watched this game in Austin.  Tinhorn fans were nice; just laughed at the ineptitude of every phase of Meyer’s team. 
The brisket was remarkable.

(09-12-2021, 04:30 PM)Eric1 Wrote: [ -> ]

(09-12-2021, 04:22 PM)homebiscuit Wrote: [ -> ]The irony of that is our biggest need and your username.

Yea but Thibodeaux's potential is through the roof. Dude is a freak and we can't pass on him if we're in a position to take him.

(09-12-2021, 04:33 PM)LMD Wrote: [ -> ]

(09-12-2021, 04:27 PM)flsprtsgod Wrote: [ -> ]The backs should've had 40 carries in this game, that they don't is an indictment of the coaching.

No disagreement from me. I tend to stay away from the board during the off-season because I'm generally a cynical pessimist and don't want to drag everyone down during the only time of the year when there's unmitigated hope, so I wasn't really around complaining about the ETN pick, even though I disagreed with taking a RB so high. Now that we've, apparently, seen UM's offensive gameplan, which doesn't include using the RB, I'm even more confused now about their taking a RB so high than I was at the time of the draft. Just looking for some help understanding the move, if anyone can provide it.

(09-12-2021, 04:31 PM)WingerDinger Wrote: [ -> ]TLaw 28/51, 332 yards, 3 TDs, 3 Int's

(09-12-2021, 04:38 PM)MoJagFan Wrote: [ -> ]

(09-12-2021, 04:33 PM)LMD Wrote: [ -> ]No disagreement from me. I tend to stay away from the board during the off-season because I'm generally a cynical pessimist and don't want to drag everyone down during the only time of the year when there's unmitigated hope, so I wasn't really around complaining about the ETN pick, even though I disagreed with taking a RB so high. Now that we've, apparently, seen UM's offensive gameplan, which doesn't include using the RB, I'm even more confused now about their taking a RB so high than I was at the time of the draft. Just looking for some help understanding the move, if anyone can provide it.

No one understands this franchise and their poor decisions. Game plan looks worse with the lack of execution but it seemed like a trash plan anyway.

And man Urban doesn't seem to like Robinson.

(09-12-2021, 04:38 PM)MoJagFan Wrote: [ -> ]

(09-12-2021, 04:33 PM)LMD Wrote: [ -> ]No disagreement from me. I tend to stay away from the board during the off-season because I'm generally a cynical pessimist and don't want to drag everyone down during the only time of the year when there's unmitigated hope, so I wasn't really around complaining about the ETN pick, even though I disagreed with taking a RB so high. Now that we've, apparently, seen UM's offensive gameplan, which doesn't include using the RB, I'm even more confused now about their taking a RB so high than I was at the time of the draft. Just looking for some help understanding the move, if anyone can provide it.

No one understands this franchise and their poor decisions. Game plan looks work with the lack of execution but it seemed like a trash plan anyway.

And man Urban doesn't seem to like Robinson.

(09-12-2021, 04:41 PM)homebiscuit Wrote: [ -> ]

(09-12-2021, 04:38 PM)MoJagFan Wrote: [ -> ]No one understands this franchise and their poor decisions. Game plan looks work with the lack of execution but it seemed like a trash plan anyway.

And man Urban doesn't seem to like Robinson.

Isn't that weird? I sure would like to know the dynamics behind that.

(09-12-2021, 04:39 PM)TheO-LineMatters Wrote: [ -> ]

(09-12-2021, 04:31 PM)WingerDinger Wrote: [ -> ]TLaw 28/51, 332 yards, 3 TDs, 3 Int's

Just the fact that Meyer allowed his rookie QB to attempt 51 passes in his first NFL game is inexcusable.

(09-12-2021, 04:46 PM)flsprtsgod Wrote: [ -> ]

(09-12-2021, 04:41 PM)homebiscuit Wrote: [ -> ]Isn't that weird? I sure would like to know the dynamics behind that.

"Any manager who can't get along with a .400 hitter is crazy."

(09-12-2021, 04:48 PM)captivating Wrote: [ -> ]

(09-12-2021, 04:39 PM)TheO-LineMatters Wrote: [ -> ]Just the fact that Meyer allowed his rookie QB to attempt 51 passes in his first NFL game is inexcusable.

What, at 7 - 34 you want to run the ball?

(09-12-2021, 04:48 PM)captivating Wrote: [ -> ]

(09-12-2021, 04:39 PM)TheO-LineMatters Wrote: [ -> ]Just the fact that Meyer allowed his rookie QB to attempt 51 passes in his first NFL game is inexcusable.

What, at 7 - 34 you want to run the ball?

(09-12-2021, 04:49 PM)NYC4jags Wrote: [ -> ]

(09-12-2021, 04:48 PM)captivating Wrote: [ -> ]What, at 7 - 34 you want to run the ball?

At 0-14 they certainly could have run it a lot more than they did

(09-12-2021, 04:52 PM)MoJagFan Wrote: [ -> ]

(09-12-2021, 04:49 PM)NYC4jags Wrote: [ -> ]At 0-14 they certainly could have run it a lot more than they did

Do we have run plays? Bubble screens count right? I am not sure about the setup we have.

Edit:
I mean short passing game in place of runs.

(09-12-2021, 05:01 PM)Newton Wrote: [ -> ]Guys, this was just a disappointing effort on every front. The thing is, we’ve all waited so long to see some sort of change, and this looks like a step backward more than anything.

(09-12-2021, 05:01 PM)Newton Wrote: [ -> ]Guys, this was just a disappointing effort on every front. The thing is, we’ve all waited so long to see some sort of change, and this looks like a step backward more than anything.