Jacksonville Jaguars Fan Forums

Quote:So Bortles throws 35 tds, and Brady throws 36 tds. Age adjusted, Bortles is much better than Brady and should be ranked higher. Am I doing this right, or do you see how your thought process is [BLEEP] at best?

lol

Quote:So Bortles throws 35 tds, and Brady throws 36 tds. Age adjusted, Bortles is much better than Brady and should be ranked higher. Am I doing this right, or do you see how your thought process is [BLEEP] at best?

You're going to hurt his head with all this knowledge. Lol.

Quote:Because Cooks did it in the NFL at the same age as Hurns was still at Miami? Age adjusted production is huge.

I guess that makes Allen Robinson the best WRin the NFL

Quote:So Bortles throws 35 tds, and Brady throws 36 tds.  Age adjusted, Bortles is much better than Brady and should be ranked higher.  Am I doing this right, or do you see how your thought process is [BLEEP] at best?

Quarterbacks are the exception to pretty much every rule, and you know that...good try though. 

Quote:Quarterbacks are the exception to pretty much every rule, and you know that...good try though.

That makes no sense.


If anything QBs take the longest to develop.


You got owned man, admit it.

Quote:You, sir, win the thread.

Association fallacies win threads now? 

Quote:That makes no sense.


If anything QBs take the longest to develop.


You got owned man, admit it.

No, it's highly proven that QBs don't have a typical developmental bell curve like virtually every other position does...the largest factor being because it's a position that needs little physical development or physical traits period. 

 

This is not difficult stuff to comprehend...

So Gurley runs for 10 tds, and AP runs for 11 tds.  Age adjusted, Gurley is much better than Peterson and should be ranked higher.  Am I doing this right, or do you see how your thought process is [BLEEP] at best?

Quote:No, it's highly proven that QBs don't have a typical developmental bell curve like virtually every other position does...the largest factor being because it's a position that needs little physical development or physical traits period.


This is not difficult stuff to comprehend...

You're not making any sense. At all.


But hey keep writing, it amuses us

Quote:You're not making any sense. At all.


But hey keep writing, it amuses us

Like I said, it's not difficult stuff to comprehend...if it's not making sense that's a you problem not mine. 

Quote:So Gurley runs for 10 tds, and AP runs for 11 tds.  Age adjusted, Gurley is much better than Peterson and should be ranked higher.  Am I doing this right, or do you see how your thought process is [BLEEP] at best?

You know what a bell curve is right? You choosing a player like AD who is nearing the end of his would put him at the same level roughly as someone who is at the beginning of theirs like Gurley...and thus would be pretty equally impressive.

 

If you wanted to make an equitable comparison you pick someone who is starting their arc compared to someone who should be in the middle of theirs, not at the very end. 

Quote:Cooks just put up 1100+ yards and 9 TDs, and he isn't even going to be 23 until after this season starts. He is knocking on the door of being a top 10 WR.

So, he is close to Hurns.

Haha KY is hilarious

Quote:That will be a real fun season

 

This message board will be awash in complaints of a lack of a running game.

So Khalil Mack has 15 sacks, and Watt has 17.5 sacks.  Age adjusted, Mack is much better than Watt and should be ranked higher.  Am I doing this right, or do you see how your thought process is [BLEEP] at best?

 

Does this example meet your randomly selected criteria?

No wonder no one respects Kentucky. Lol

Stop whining about Bortles not making the list... The list is voted on by the players, and his peers.. With 18 ints maybe a lot of players dont respect him yet.. Hopefully he changes that this year and many years to come.

Who whined about Bortles?

Spider charts and age adjusted production but only at one position and only if it suits my argument.


Am I doing KY right?

Quote:So Khalil Mack has 15 sacks, and Watt has 17.5 sacks.  Age adjusted, Mack is much better than Watt and should be ranked higher.  Am I doing this right, or do you see how your thought process is [BLEEP] at best?

 

Does this example meet your randomly selected criteria?

No, because Khalil Mack was 24+ last year while doing that...pretty much right at the beginning of an athletic prime. You don't need to age adjust stuff when they are in their prime, or maybe baaarely before in Mack's case. 

 

You're just proving that you have no nuance as a sports fan. There are a plethora of studies and articles that explain all about this and it really isn't very complicated at all.