12-08-2015, 11:15 PM
Quote:"We tried everything"..... And couldn't stop a QB from running 87 yards.
Gus Bradley is a terrible coach. Khan is a fraud for keeping him.
You're a fraud for saying Khan is a fraud.
How's your team doing?
Quote:"We tried everything"..... And couldn't stop a QB from running 87 yards.
Gus Bradley is a terrible coach. Khan is a fraud for keeping him.
Quote:I know it may be unpopular but Rob Ryan needs a job. He did get fired from his past two but he was working with probably less talent than the jags of this year and the saints defense is a mess without him too.He did so well with New Orleans.....
I think he probably is a Gus guy, and he could bring some aggressive and creative packages to the jaguars.
That might be my first move to fix the defense this offseason.
Quote:So here's a food for thought, since everyone is hating on Gus for the "we tried everything". Constantly, people blame Gus for the weakness of our defense and their inability to defend the pass. But here's a statistics that I came across which...quite frankly...shocked me. SHOCKED me.
The Jaguars are tied for 14th in the league in SACKS. Think about that for a second. We are tied for 14th in sacks...ahead of the Jets and their front four, the Bucs and McCoy, Dallas, Arizona, Baltimore, and the Giants just to name a few.
We are 14th in the league in sacks...with our leading sacker being a blitzing cornerback. Our sack stats are:
Colvin - 4 (cornerback - scheme sacks)
Odrick - 4 Run Stuffing end
Davis - 3.5 pass rush specialist - scheme sacks usually stunts)
Miller - 3 run stuffing DT
Telvin - 2.5 (rush LB - scheme)
Tyson - 2 (run stuffing end)
Abry Jones - 2 - DT
Skuta - 2 LB
Sergio -1.5 FS
Those are our leaders, with our two LEOs with 2 a piece. Uh...you don't think there's a problem here? You don't think that the coaches aren't scheming to get sacks and pressure from all over the defense to make up for the lack of rush? That they aren't trying everything even if it means leaving other areas vulnerable if we don't get home?
Quote:I hadn't realized we made it up to the middle of the pack. Remember last year we were among the lead leaders in sacks for most of the year with similar results as far as them being spread out over several players.We are middle of the pack in sacks, and when your leader is a blitzing corner and a run stuffer (coverage sacks anyone)
Quote:We are middle of the pack in sacks, and when your leader is a blitzing corner and a run stuffer (coverage sacks anyone)
it means you aren't getting consistent pressure. Which we aren't. We're bottom in the league in pressures and hurries and hits....
The pass rush isn't working, even if we are middle of the pack in sacks.
Last year it was spread out among a lot of Dline and LBers...
We have 4+ from DBs....and no one even close to sniffing double digits.
I think we have some good young talent on D that are playing their butts off but are surrounded by old or ineffective players.
I wonder though, sack numbers aside, would Fowler have been able to add in enough pressures...
I'd like to think so.
Quote:And thus the problem. We're having to be creative just to bring pressure, much less sacks. And when you are doing that much when it comes to bringing corner and safety blitzes, you are leaving areas in your defense vulnerable. That's even assuming our blitz works, which I've seen enough times 5-6 guys get stonewalled.It's the only way to get pressure, this season anyway.
Quote:It's the only way to get pressure, this season anyway.With the offense finally getting in gear, there's no doubt that DC needs to add to the defense. 1st/2nd round picks + 1 or 2 FA signings.
I suspect Caldwell will be investing heavily in S LB and Dline this offseason
Quote:He did so well with New Orleans.....
players not plays....
The problem seems to be, lacking the players to run the scheme.
So we should probably run more of a base 4-3, and bring blitzing LBers and blitz out of nickel and dime.
Not sure Ryan would get much more out of this D crew, running this Seattle scheme, without a proper LEO or FS
Quote:Ryan runs multiple schemes so my thought process was that he would put the players in the best positions to succeed.
Quote:This is all we can hope for the DC to do when the Jags are as challenged defensively that they are challenged, or at least look that way.
Quote:I mean, I find it funny that people clamor for Ryan when his Saints defense has been even worse than ours. And they actually have a guy who can rush the passer. Cowboys fans are glad he's gone too.
Quote:I mean, I find it funny that people clamor for Ryan when his Saints defense has been even worse than ours. And they actually have a guy who can rush the passer. Cowboys fans are glad he's gone too.
Quote:Hahaha someone wants Rob Ryan?!
He's been absolute trash everywhere he's been. Stephone Anthony, Cameron Jordan, Byrd, Vacaro, Ellerbe, Jenkins.... There is talent on that team. No reason not to be at least average.
Quote:And without him the saints gave up 24 to the Texans and 41 to the panthers. No reason they shouldn't be average...24 to the Texans is amazing considering where they were before.
Quote:24 to the Texans is amazing considering where they were before.
And the Panthers are undefeated sooooo.....
Rob Ryan is an awful choice dude.
Quote:Ok. That's cool that you think so. I listed my opinion and the reasoning behind it. If you aren't in agreement that's quite alright, but you posted nothing of substance either way.He runs multiple schemes? Yea... And runs them all poorly.
Quote:He runs multiple schemes? Yea... And runs them all poorly.
It's pretty clear is wasn't a talent issue either. When he left Dallas, they had worse players (lost Ware) and their defense got better.
This year, the Saints had a historically bad defense.
At that point it's not about the players. They have talent. They were just being used incorrectly.
So you saying you want to bring in a guy, who doesn't know how to use his personel and has had some historically bad defenses, makes zero sense.
You can have an opinion but I'm not sure it's a good one.