04-03-2014, 10:33 AM
Quote:LOL. This is ridiculous.This. Only players that played for the jags id put over mojo is Tony, Fred & Jimmy.
10,000+ all purpose yards, 87 touchdowns, and he doesn't deserve the ROH?
Get outta here.
Quote:LOL. This is ridiculous.This. Only players that played for the jags id put over mojo is Tony, Fred & Jimmy.
10,000+ all purpose yards, 87 touchdowns, and he doesn't deserve the ROH?
Get outta here.
Quote:Yeah, I would imagine it's a decision between the owner and possibly Mark Lamping. They might consult some of the Jaguars ambassadors from years gone by.
I would imagine that once the team gets back on track and starts winning with some consistency, we'll see fewer of these Pride inductions. My impression is that this is more of a dog and pony show to keep the fans happy while they're rebuilding. So, if someone like Jimmy Smith wants to get into the Pride, it needs to happen soon.
Quote:So, you're insinuating that its okay to have lower standards for the Pride when you are rebuilding? Got it.What I'm saying is that the marketing folks at the stadium recognize they need to do other things to keep fans interested during a rebuild. Brunell was borderline, but the expectation going into last season was that this was going to be a bad team, so it was a smart marketing decision to induct a guy who is still very popular among local fans despite being gone from Jacksonville for a decade. The fans had something to look forward to, and it was actually a nice atmosphere for that game.
All that does to me is ultimately cheapen the honor.
Boselli, Fred and Jimmy should be the only ones in there right now.
MoJo? maybe....he's fringe. Certainly not a slam dunk.
Quote:What I'm saying is that the marketing folks at the stadium recognize they need to do other things to keep fans interested during a rebuild. Brunell was borderline, but the expectation going into last season was that this was going to be a bad team, so it was a smart marketing decision to induct a guy who is still very popular among local fans despite being gone from Jacksonville for a decade. The fans had something to look forward to, and it was actually a nice atmosphere for that game.Ding! Ding! For those who dont think MJD should get in. Name 5 heck even 2 players who played for the JAGUARS not named Tony B, Fred & J smooth who are better then MJD? Dont worry ill wait......
Jimmy Smith SHOULD be in the pride, but his off the field antics hurt him. I can see him eventually getting in, but the longer it takes, the less likely it seems that will happen. Like Brunell, there are still a lot of fans who would love to see him in the pride.
Putting MJD in the pride would not cheapen it one bit. His numbers are more than adequate to warrant consideration. If this bothers you, feel free to root for the team you actually are a fan of. MJD is one of the best players to ever put on a uniform for this franchise. This isn't the NFL Hall of Fame. It's the Pride of the JAGUARS. You seem to struggle with this.
Quote:Ding! Ding! For those who dont think MJD should get in. Name 5 heck even 2 players who played for the JAGUARS not named Tony B, Fred & J smooth who are better then MJD? Dont worry ill wait......
Quote:So, you're insinuating that its okay to have lower standards for the Pride when you are rebuilding? Got it.<p style="font-size:12px;background-color:rgb(247,247,247);">No worries. Only those who attend games will have to look at the ROH anyway. It wont show too often on your Zenith.
All that does to me is ultimately cheapen the honor.
Boselli, Fred and Jimmy should be the only ones in there right now.
MoJo? maybe....he's fringe. Certainly not a slam dunk.
Quote:What a stupid rationale.He had 13,000+ all purpose yards and 87 touchdowns. How is that not ROH worthy?
Using your logic, if the team continued to draft bad QB over the years, then Garrard should make the ROH, merely by being better than those bad selections....smh...
MoJo was a very good RB for us, but theres gotta be a line drawn for a standard. I would think that line should be 10,000 yards for a career, unless some other outstanding reasoning/ rationale was met, such as singlehandedly putting the team on his back for a SB run or something. MoJo never did that or any other outstanding accomplishment. I think he should barely miss the ROH, personally.
Brunell shouldn't be in at all. His inclusion opens up the Pandora's box for all other not worthy players to be argued in.
Quote:
<p style="font-size:12px;background-color:rgb(247,247,247);">No worries. Only those who attend games will have to look at the ROH anyway. It wont show too often on your Zenith.
<p style="font-size:12px;background-color:rgb(247,247,247);">As time goes on, I bet he gets in. I think he should. Freddy, Jimmy and Mojo are the guys who fans talk about long after their gone.
<p style="font-size:12px;background-color:rgb(247,247,247);">
<p style="font-size:12px;background-color:rgb(247,247,247);">Mojo, seemingly tackled, no one sees him, after a short scrum, he emerges and busts a 80 yd TD. Mojo pancaking Merriman. Mojo running with 2-3 guys hanging on to him.
<p style="font-size:12px;background-color:rgb(247,247,247);">All this on being on a sub par team for years.
<p style="font-size:12px;background-color:rgb(247,247,247);">Just watching him live at Alltel, The Bank has provided enough memories to put him up there.
Quote:What a stupid rationale.See now your reaching. MJD was darn good. Garrard No. Your first statement is not at all what I ment. Go back to the lab and try again. Agree 100% with bolded. Still didnt answer my question tho.
Using your logic, if the team continued to draft bad QB over the years, then Garrard should make the ROH, merely by being better than those bad selections....smh...
MoJo was a very good RB for us, but theres gotta be a line drawn for a standard. I would think that line should be 10,000 yards for a career, unless some other outstanding reasoning/ rationale was met, such as singlehandedly putting the team on his back for a SB run or something. MoJo never did that or any other outstanding accomplishment. I think he should barely miss the ROH, personally.
Brunell shouldn't be in at all. His inclusion opens up the Pandora's box for all other not worthy players to be argued in.
Quote:He had 13,000+ all purpose yards and 87 touchdowns. How is that not ROH worthy?
Quote:lol @ "all purpose yards"....thats not what I said as the standard. 10,000 rushing yards is what I cited for the standard of RB to be considered for induction.
If we're just counting all purpose yards, the total should be upwards of 15,000+ as the minimum for consideration.
Its supposed to mean something to make this thing, not just induct every single player than had a career here.
Quote:So Brunell probably should have had 60,000 yards before getting consideration right?
Quote:What a stupid rationale.
Using your logic, if the team continued to draft bad QB over the years, then Garrard should make the ROH, merely by being better than those bad selections....smh...
MoJo was a very good RB for us, but theres gotta be a line drawn for a standard. I would think that line should be 10,000 yards for a career, unless some other outstanding reasoning/ rationale was met, such as singlehandedly putting the team on his back for a SB run or something. MoJo never did that or any other outstanding accomplishment. I think he should barely miss the ROH, personally.
Brunell shouldn't be in at all. His inclusion opens up the Pandora's box for all other not worthy players to be argued in.
Quote:lol @ "all purpose yards"....thats not what I said as the standard. 10,000 rushing yards is what I cited for the standard of RB to be considered for induction.Why do you lol at all purpose yards? Is catching the ball out of the back field not important? MJD was one of the best pass catching backs in the league for a while. Had MJD not sit behind Fred Taylor earlier in his career, he most certainly would have passed 15,000 all purpose yards. You're such a clown.
If we're just counting all purpose yards, the total should be upwards of 15,000+ as the minimum for consideration.
Its supposed to mean something to make this thing, not just induct every single player than had a career here.
Quote:lol @ "all purpose yards"....thats not what I said as the standard. 10,000 rushing yards is what I cited for the standard of RB to be considered for induction.I think you're fighting a losing battle.
If we're just counting all purpose yards, the total should be upwards of 15,000+ as the minimum for consideration.
Its supposed to mean something to make this thing, not just induct every single player than had a career here.
Quote:Why do you lol at all purpose yards? Is catching the ball out of the back field not important? MJD was one of the best pass catching backs in the league for a while. Had MJD not sit behind Fred Taylor earlier in his career, he most certainly would have passed 15,000 all purpose yards. You're such a clown.
Quote:Actually if people read what I said in this thread, I QUOTE said that MoJo was a "fringe" inductee. (post 102) I'm not naming him "just a guy". That was Brunell's career here.... :whistling: What I also did say was that MoJo into the ROH wouldn't be a "slam dunk", and it isn't.
I did say that MoJo didn't reach my standard of 10,000 rushing yards which IMO should be the benchmark for inductees from the RB position, again, unless they did some sort of rare feat like put this team on their back in a PLAYOFF run culminating in a SB title or something. But anything short of that, then I see MoJo as a fringe ROH player.
Quote:So we are saying the next RB to be inducted into the ROH has to have 14,000+ yards (rushing and receiving)...plus exceed 93 total TDs? Man I guess we are never inducting another RB into the ROH.