Jacksonville Jaguars Fan Forums

(02-05-2019, 11:55 PM)jj82284 Wrote: [ -> ]

(02-05-2019, 03:39 PM)rollerjag Wrote: [ -> ]Trump inherited a recovering economy and somehow managed to not muck it up. Good man.

Lies lies darn lies

Where was the lie, that the economy wasn't recovering in 2016, or Trump didn't muck it up?

I have not seen the Democrats wear so much white since they started the KKK

(02-06-2019, 12:08 PM)The Drifter Wrote: [ -> ]I have not seen the Democrats wear so much white since they started the KKK

I thought the Republicans were going to wear brown for Donald.

(02-06-2019, 12:08 PM)The Drifter Wrote: [ -> ]I have not seen the Democrats wear so much white since they started the KKK

Notice how the only time they stood and clapped was when The President acknowledged the fact that there are more women in Congress today then ever before?  They sat on their hands when it came to taking care of babies, talk about freedom, etc.

(02-06-2019, 01:54 PM)jagibelieve Wrote: [ -> ]

(02-06-2019, 12:08 PM)The Drifter Wrote: [ -> ]I have not seen the Democrats wear so much white since they started the KKK

Notice how the only time they stood and clapped was when The President acknowledged the fact that there are more women in Congress today then ever before?  They sat on their hands when it came to taking care of babies, talk about freedom, etc.

They don't consider birth to be a success.

(02-07-2019, 07:41 AM)flsprtsgod Wrote: [ -> ]

(02-06-2019, 01:54 PM)jagibelieve Wrote: [ -> ]Notice how the only time they stood and clapped was when The President acknowledged the fact that there are more women in Congress today then ever before?  They sat on their hands when it came to taking care of babies, talk about freedom, etc.

They don't consider birth to be a success.

No, they don't think a man who had sex with a centerfold model while his wife nursed their newborn child is sincere about his concern for babies, freedom, etc.

(02-06-2019, 12:08 PM)The Drifter Wrote: [ -> ]I have not seen the Democrats wear so much white since they started the KKK

Do you know why the women were wearing white?

(02-09-2019, 04:22 PM)rollerjag Wrote: [ -> ]

(02-06-2019, 12:08 PM)The Drifter Wrote: [ -> ]I have not seen the Democrats wear so much white since they started the KKK

Do you know why the women were wearing white?

So they would know by the smudges when the riff-raff and deplorables came too close?

(02-09-2019, 04:22 PM)rollerjag Wrote: [ -> ]

(02-06-2019, 12:08 PM)The Drifter Wrote: [ -> ]I have not seen the Democrats wear so much white since they started the KKK

Do you know why the women were wearing white?

Or was it this?

(02-09-2019, 07:37 PM)MalabarJag Wrote: [ -> ]

(02-09-2019, 04:22 PM)rollerjag Wrote: [ -> ]Do you know why the women were wearing white?

Or was it this?

Stupid post is stupid. Godwin invoked.

2 more scoops of winning...

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/...-michigan/

That's quite interesting because if they have moved the plant due to costs the American consumer is now lost and paying higher prices...

So much for you rabid right wing free traders.

Also the Kim Jong incident, definitely not winning

(02-09-2019, 07:37 PM)MalabarJag Wrote: [ -> ]

(02-09-2019, 04:22 PM)rollerjag Wrote: [ -> ]Do you know why the women were wearing white?

Or was it this?

When you don't know your history >>>

(02-28-2019, 11:21 PM)lastonealive Wrote: [ -> ]That's quite interesting because if they have moved the plant due to costs the American consumer is now lost and paying higher prices...

So much for you rabid right wing free traders.

Also the Kim Jong incident, definitely not winning

What incident?

(03-01-2019, 01:07 AM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote: [ -> ]

(02-28-2019, 11:21 PM)lastonealive Wrote: [ -> ]That's quite interesting because if they have moved the plant due to costs the American consumer is now lost and paying higher prices...

So much for you rabid right wing free traders.

Also the Kim Jong incident, definitely not winning

What incident?

Meh, just that pesky incident that has been going on since 1953. Another foreigner questioning why we haven’t fixed it yet.

(03-01-2019, 01:07 AM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote: [ -> ]

(02-28-2019, 11:21 PM)lastonealive Wrote: [ -> ]That's quite interesting because if they have moved the plant due to costs the American consumer is now lost and paying higher prices...

So much for you rabid right wing free traders.

Also the Kim Jong incident, definitely not winning

What incident?

You know, the one where he walked away rather than sending money or making concessions to the Norks like the previous three presidents. That incident.

(03-01-2019, 10:53 AM)MalabarJag Wrote: [ -> ]

(03-01-2019, 01:07 AM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote: [ -> ]What incident?

You know, the one where he walked away rather than sending money or making concessions to the Norks like the previous three presidents. That incident.

How dare he? Why I never...

He made Kim Jong look a legitimate powerful world leader and got nothing out of it himself.

A huge mess up

(03-01-2019, 06:16 PM)lastonealive Wrote: [ -> ]He made Kim Jong look a legitimate powerful world leader and got nothing out of it himself.

A huge mess up

So you think KJU is a legitimate powerful world leader based on Trump's actions? 

Or are you just assuming that world leaders are that stupid and you aren't?

(03-01-2019, 06:16 PM)lastonealive Wrote: [ -> ]He made Kim Jong look a legitimate powerful world leader and got nothing out of it himself.

A huge mess up

He isn't making anyone look like a world leader. He's negotiating with a dictator to remove their nuclear weapons, and he has to do it personally because there are a bunch of democrats and republicans that think bombing them is better than talking to him.

Does negotiating peace with hostile countries make those countries world leaders?