09-13-2017, 02:11 PM
(09-13-2017, 02:06 PM)NYC4jags Wrote: [ -> ]really?Oh, that's the B squad forum. I don't really keep up with those idiots.
I see lots of fear here:
http://www.titansreport.com/topic/28724-...s-defense/
(09-13-2017, 02:06 PM)NYC4jags Wrote: [ -> ]really?Oh, that's the B squad forum. I don't really keep up with those idiots.
I see lots of fear here:
http://www.titansreport.com/topic/28724-...s-defense/
(09-13-2017, 02:11 PM)SDM Wrote: [ -> ](09-13-2017, 02:06 PM)NYC4jags Wrote: [ -> ]really?Oh, that's the B squad forum. I don't really keep up with those idiots.
I see lots of fear here:
http://www.titansreport.com/topic/28724-...s-defense/
(09-13-2017, 02:07 PM)B2hibry Wrote: [ -> ]Funny, I don't see anyone here claiming a Division Title already. While the environment in your woods has changed a bit, there are still a few with delusions of granger. I still think the tacks overall have the better team in the south, but lack consistency. I hope they sleep on the jags.You may not be claiming division title but people are throwing out predictions of a blowout over us. And for what? Because we lost to a top team and you beat the trash Texans with Tom Savage at QB? You guys just picked 4th overall in the draft for a reason. I get being optimistic, but some of you need to slow your roll.
(09-13-2017, 10:43 AM)JaguarsWoman Wrote: [ -> ](09-13-2017, 10:19 AM)The Hammer Wrote: [ -> ]How do I explain your TOP"?
Houston could not sustain a drive due to piss poor OL and QB play.
And I get that you guys are in love with Calais Campbell. What you seem to be ignoring is that he will not be going against practice squad caliber OTs like he was in Houston. He will be going against a Pro Bowl OT and an All Pro OT.
You are obviously ignoring what the media says about Calais Campbell. Jaguars fans are not making it up when they say how good he is. Pick another player to smack talk about.
TOP is determined by the coaches. Doug Marrone and Nathaniel Hackett decided to eat the clock by calling Leonard Fournette's number. It is not rocket science.
(09-13-2017, 02:06 PM)NYC4jags Wrote: [ -> ](09-13-2017, 02:01 PM)SDM Wrote: [ -> ]Nah, most Titan fans are about as delusional as you guys.
really?
I see lots of fear here:
http://www.titansreport.com/topic/28724-...s-defense/
(09-13-2017, 02:13 PM)Kane Wrote: [ -> ]So where do the A squad losers hang out?We split our time fairly evenly between that site and gotitans.com
www.bangmysisterdiscussion.com?
(09-13-2017, 02:18 PM)The Hammer Wrote: [ -> ](09-13-2017, 10:43 AM)JaguarsWoman Wrote: [ -> ]You are obviously ignoring what the media says about Calais Campbell. Jaguars fans are not making it up when they say how good he is. Pick another player to smack talk about.
TOP is determined by the coaches. Doug Marrone and Nathaniel Hackett decided to eat the clock by calling Leonard Fournette's number. It is not rocket science.
I am not saying Campbell isn't good. it will not be nearlly as easy for him though going against these guys
(09-13-2017, 02:18 PM)SDM Wrote: [ -> ](09-13-2017, 02:07 PM)B2hibry Wrote: [ -> ]Funny, I don't see anyone here claiming a Division Title already. While the environment in your woods has changed a bit, there are still a few with delusions of granger. I still think the tacks overall have the better team in the south, but lack consistency. I hope they sleep on the jags.You may not be claiming division title but people are throwing out predictions of a blowout over us. And for what? Because we lost to a top team and you beat the trash Texans with Tom Savage at QB? You guys just picked 4th overall in the draft for a reason. I get being optimistic, but some of you need to slow your roll.
Like I said earlier, I could see this game going either way. Either fanbase being so cocky as to be calling for a blowout is just hilarious to me.
Also, I highly doubt our team is going to "sleep on the Jags" after a brutal home loss to open the season. Add into that the fact that overlooking you guys last season is THE reason we didn't take the division and go to the playoffs.
(09-13-2017, 02:04 PM)Etdavis2006 Wrote: [ -> ]Tacks are losing big this week.
Jags 42-10
The tacks know it. Y'all watched your team get smashed by Oakland. It's over. Mariota is not the guy and he is sofT.
Malarky lol. Marrone actually has a winning record as ahead coach hahaha
(09-13-2017, 02:19 PM)B2hibry Wrote: [ -> ]It's the same here: http://gotitans.com/threads/week-2-titan...ars.98524/Well, 82% of the people who voted in the poll are predicting a Titans win. Just because we are being realistic about what could go wrong (rather than predicting 49-3 or whatever like you guys) doesn't mean we aren't confident in coming away with the W.
(09-13-2017, 02:21 PM)Thaddeus43 Wrote: [ -> ](09-13-2017, 02:04 PM)Etdavis2006 Wrote: [ -> ]Tacks are losing big this week.
Jags 42-10
The tacks know it. Y'all watched your team get smashed by Oakland. It's over. Mariota is not the guy and he is sofT.
Malarky lol. Marrone actually has a winning record as ahead coach hahaha
Smashed? Lol OK ... obviously you didn't watch the game.
Look at the stats, that game was dead even. The Titans secondary, which is supposedly so terrible, allowed 2 TDs ... one came from a short field due to a [BLEEP] onside kick, the next didn't come until the 4th Q ... that's against a high powered Oak offense. That should have matched up very favorably against us ... yet the jags are gonna put up 42?
How will they do That? Is it from the 3.8 ypc that 4net got You? Or the 125 passing yards that Bortles got?
Jags D gave the O every oppurrunity to score points against the texans. Yet, jags O only could muster 22 points.
Do you really think the 4 turnovers and 10 sacks wasn't a fluke? Lol. You're delusional then...
Hope you guys like FGs cause you will be settling for a lot of them this year.
(09-13-2017, 02:21 PM)Etdavis2006 Wrote: [ -> ]We are saying blowout cause we blew y'all out last year with nothing on the line and y'all trying to go to the playoffs. Now it's us trying to command the division and y'all are scrambling on the road after a loss. We may put up 60 on y'all with another 10 sacks.Haha, okay. At least now I know who not to take seriously in this thread.
(09-13-2017, 02:23 PM)SDM Wrote: [ -> ](09-13-2017, 02:19 PM)B2hibry Wrote: [ -> ]It's the same here: http://gotitans.com/threads/week-2-titan...ars.98524/Well, 82% of the people who voted in the poll are predicting a Titans win. Just because we are being realistic about what could go wrong (rather than predicting 49-3 or whatever like you guys) doesn't mean we aren't confident in coming away with the W.
(09-13-2017, 02:26 PM)14and3 Wrote: [ -> ]The Jags will get a moral victory. Bortles will complete double digit passes... barely.
(09-13-2017, 02:21 PM)Thaddeus43 Wrote: [ -> ](09-13-2017, 02:04 PM)Etdavis2006 Wrote: [ -> ]Tacks are losing big this week.
Jags 42-10
The tacks know it. Y'all watched your team get smashed by Oakland. It's over. Mariota is not the guy and he is sofT.
Malarky lol. Marrone actually has a winning record as ahead coach hahaha
Smashed? Lol OK ... obviously you didn't watch the game.
Look at the stats, that game was dead even. The Titans secondary, which is supposedly so terrible, allowed 2 TDs ... one came from a short field due to a [BLEEP] onside kick, the next didn't come until the 4th Q ... that's against a high powered Oak offense. That should have matched up very favorably against us ... yet the jags are gonna put up 42?
How will they do That? Is it from the 3.8 ypc that 4net got You? Or the 125 passing yards that Bortles got?
Jags D gave the O every oppurrunity to score points against the texans. Yet, jags O only could muster 22 points.
Do you really think the 4 turnovers and 10 sacks wasn't a fluke? Lol. You're delusional then...
Hope you guys like FGs cause you will be settling for a lot of them this year.
(09-13-2017, 02:24 PM)Etdavis2006 Wrote: [ -> ](09-13-2017, 02:21 PM)Thaddeus43 Wrote: [ -> ]Smashed? Lol OK ... obviously you didn't watch the game.
Look at the stats, that game was dead even. The Titans secondary, which is supposedly so terrible, allowed 2 TDs ... one came from a short field due to a [BLEEP] onside kick, the next didn't come until the 4th Q ... that's against a high powered Oak offense. That should have matched up very favorably against us ... yet the jags are gonna put up 42?
How will they do That? Is it from the 3.8 ypc that 4net got You? Or the 125 passing yards that Bortles got?
Jags D gave the O every oppurrunity to score points against the texans. Yet, jags O only could muster 22 points.
Do you really think the 4 turnovers and 10 sacks wasn't a fluke? Lol. You're delusional then...
Hope you guys like FGs cause you will be settling for a lot of them this year.
12/24/16
38-17
Jags