(09-13-2017, 02:34 PM)B2hibry Wrote: [ -> ]Just because you have a few turds over here claiming a blowout doesn't make it a majority. It is a Jags message board ya know! The MAJORITY of your board is voting/hoping for a win but saying otherwise. Either way, it would be nice to hear a reason or reasons why your troll posse thinks the tacks pull one out instead of the incoherent dribble from some in the toothless brigade.
I don't recall claiming it was a majority. But it's all over this particular thread so that's what I was responding to.
Reason why we could win? I feel we're the better team, plain and simple. The wild card here is Mike Mularkey as he's a terrible HC, which I don't have to tell you guys. His teams tend to play down to lesser competition and I fear that could be the case in this one. Maybe you guys win. But I can guarantee a blowout isn't in the cards.
(09-13-2017, 02:40 PM)SDM Wrote: [ -> ] (09-13-2017, 02:34 PM)B2hibry Wrote: [ -> ]Just because you have a few turds over here claiming a blowout doesn't make it a majority. It is a Jags message board ya know! The MAJORITY of your board is voting/hoping for a win but saying otherwise. Either way, it would be nice to hear a reason or reasons why your troll posse thinks the tacks pull one out instead of the incoherent dribble from some in the toothless brigade.
But I can guarantee a blowout isn't in the cards.
Would you happen to have the winning lotto numbers for tonight's draw by chance?
I think it's closer than some...
Jags 27
tacks 17
Monday ya'll gonna be like "dat D doe"
bahaha
I like how they call the Jags "Tarp Kitties" when they're arguing about attendance on their own boards. Ironic?
In all honesty I just think the Tacks will be over matched. The match up play to our favor.
Tacks o line versus jags d line wash
Tacks receivers versus jags corners jags
Tacks TEs and RBs versus jags LB and Safties slight edge to jags
Jags o line versus tacks d line wash
Jags receivers versus tacks corners slight edge to tacks
Jags TE and RBs versus tacks safties and LBs slight edge to jags
If your are being objective the jags should win this game. The only reason anyone would say other wise is because the are being subjective due to past teams. I would urge people to stop grading this current team like you are watching the 2014 jags. It is a new year and a new roster with a better coach. The coaching is better than anything I've seen in the last 10 years and this is the most talented jags roster I've ever seen. They might be a top 2-3 most talented roster in the league. The division and conference are on notice. I've been watching football a long time I can realize when I'm watching a good team.
Titans weak spot is the secondary and we all know that Jacksonville's offense is built around Blake "Where's It Going To Land" Bortles.
Jags by Eleventy.
(09-13-2017, 02:42 PM)Monty Wrote: [ -> ]I like how they call the Jags "Tarp Kitties" when they're arguing about attendance on their own boards. Ironic?
And the tarp joke is sooooo 2008.....
It was pre London/LA Jaguars talk...
get some new material fools...
(09-13-2017, 02:39 PM)Thaddeus43 Wrote: [ -> ] (09-13-2017, 02:24 PM)Etdavis2006 Wrote: [ -> ]12/24/16
38-17
Jags
Trap game. Titans had 2 wins over some of the top AFC teams in back to back weeks. They over looked the Jags and looked ahead to the Texans ...
But glad you guys got your SB victory that day.
01/23/00
33-14
Bro I went to last year. You had to reach damn near 20 years for that. But hey I get it we been bad for a while. Y'all will be 3-13 this year lol
(09-13-2017, 02:42 PM)Monty Wrote: [ -> ]I like how they call the Jags "Tarp Kitties" when they're arguing about attendance on their own boards. Ironic?
What's the old saying? The Jaguars get blacked out more than Gary Busey.
I couldn't imagine being asked to tackle 4net all day. Tacks gonna be ready to leave by half time. They will not have much fun that day. I can guarantee that.
(09-13-2017, 02:42 PM)Kane Wrote: [ -> ]Would you happen to have the winning lotto numbers for tonight's draw by chance?
I think it's closer than some...
Jags 27
tacks 17
Monday ya'll gonna be like "dat D doe"
bahaha
And I have no problem with that prediction. It's not even remotely a blowout. Fact of the matter is we were the much better team last year (yes, even though you beat us once, derr) and oh by the way we are actually favored in this game even though the Mighty Jags are at home.
Your D looks good. It's the offense you should be worried about. Everybody crowning Fournette already after one game of 3.8ypc. No Allen Robinson. Blake effen Bortles. Your defense is going to need a couple of scores for you guys to even sniff a blowout.
(09-13-2017, 02:50 PM)14and3 Wrote: [ -> ] (09-13-2017, 02:42 PM)Monty Wrote: [ -> ]I like how they call the Jags "Tarp Kitties" when they're arguing about attendance on their own boards. Ironic?
What's the old saying? The Jaguars get blacked out more than Gary Busey.
Must be a real old saying... since there haven't been any blackouts since Khan showed up...
(09-13-2017, 02:51 PM)SDM Wrote: [ -> ] (09-13-2017, 02:42 PM)Kane Wrote: [ -> ]Would you happen to have the winning lotto numbers for tonight's draw by chance?
I think it's closer than some...
Jags 27
tacks 17
Monday ya'll gonna be like "dat D doe"
bahaha
And I have no problem with that prediction. It's not even remotely a blowout. Fact of the matter is we were the much better team last year (yes, even though you beat us once, derr) and oh by the way we are actually favored in this game even though the Mighty Jags are at home.
Your D looks good. It's the offense you should be worried about. Everybody crowning Fournette already after one game of 3.8ypc. No Allen Robinson. Blake effen Bortles. Your defense is going to need a couple of scores for you guys to even sniff a blowout.
Firstly, we didn't have Arob for essentially the entire game.
Sure the YPA isn't gaudy but LF pushes piles and puts us in manageable situations (3rd and 5 or less)
The D is nasty, and while the offense didn't put up big numbers Bortles wasn't helped by quite a few drops. He could have had another TD and another 75 yards....
Bortles was accurate and wasn't even close to being touched by one of the best DLines in the league.
I'm not worried about our offense at all. We all knew that was what Coach Doug wanted. Ball control, throw when we have to.
It isn't like Mary was running the tacks up and down the field putting up points either.
People don't know the difference between a game plan and ability. Blake has thrown for 5tds on y'all lol. The game plan was the beat the tinhorns up (5 concussions, Watt broke finger). I would urge the tacks fans to be prepared for this the can of whoop***. It'll be on sale this week especially for yall
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=KPKXvPVn7Es
Since we're digging up old [BLEEP] to throw shade.....
![[Image: failureTitans.jpg]](http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c51/anubis679/funny/failureTitans.jpg)
![[Image: dot4vglm54en9xc68iqs.png]](https://i.kinja-img.com/gawker-media/image/upload/s--EW-2W9Vd--/c_scale,fl_progressive,q_80,w_800/dot4vglm54en9xc68iqs.png)
I'm not sure I'd go calling your defense "nasty" just yet. It's a one game sample size that came against a very terrible OL and QB.
(09-13-2017, 03:01 PM)SDM Wrote: [ -> ]I'm not sure I'd go calling your defense "nasty" just yet. It's a one game sample size that came against a very terrible OL and QB.
To go along with ending last season top 5 in yards allowed before adding Church and Campbell
(09-13-2017, 03:01 PM)LSDM Wrote: [ -> ]I'm not sure I'd go calling your defense "nasty" just yet. It's a one game sample size that came against a very terrible OL and QB.
They were top six last year. Last year they were great. This year is nasty
(09-13-2017, 03:01 PM)SDM Wrote: [ -> ]I'm not sure I'd go calling your defense "nasty" just yet. It's a one game sample size that came against a very terrible OL and QB.
our D was actually pretty damn good last year... put in bad position time after time by an awful coach staff and an awful offense...
And then we added Campbell Bouye and Church....
Say what you want but...
![[Image: 9d4c0b73a444eedec8768a53cc2d5ccb--footba...-humor.jpg]](https://i.pinimg.com/236x/9d/4c/0b/9d4c0b73a444eedec8768a53cc2d5ccb--football-slogans-sports-humor.jpg)
(09-13-2017, 03:01 PM)SDM Wrote: [ -> ]I'm not sure I'd go calling your defense "nasty" just yet. It's a one game sample size that came against a very terrible OL and QB.
We got after your guys pretty good last time we played.