(10-25-2019, 02:11 PM)ferocious Wrote: [ -> ] (10-25-2019, 02:04 PM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote: [ -> ]Looks like Lisa Page will be going to the booty house soon too. For her sake, lets hope her lover Peter is able to join her.
Rush brought up a good point earlier. Someone is going to turn soon when they come to the realization that they aren't going to go to jail for Brennen, Clapper, or Comey.
Tic Tock.
I stopped reading when you mentioned Rush.
So what do you think about the possibility that some internal assets are going to flip on Brennen, Clapper, or Comey? Or do you just tell yourself that there's nothing there to reveal, that the whole Russia Collusion Insurance Policy was on the up and up? I bet even little old ignorant me knows what you're going to say...
(10-25-2019, 02:31 PM)flsprtsgod Wrote: [ -> ] (10-25-2019, 02:11 PM)ferocious Wrote: [ -> ]I stopped reading when you mentioned Rush.
So what do you think about the possibility that some internal assets are going to flip on Brennen, Clapper, or Comey? Or do you just tell yourself that there's nothing there to reveal, that the whole Russia Collusion Insurance Policy was on the up and up? I bet even little old ignorant me knows what you're going to say...
What does little old ignorant you think I'm going to say?
(10-25-2019, 02:40 PM)ferocious Wrote: [ -> ] (10-25-2019, 02:31 PM)flsprtsgod Wrote: [ -> ]So what do you think about the possibility that some internal assets are going to flip on Brennen, Clapper, or Comey? Or do you just tell yourself that there's nothing there to reveal, that the whole Russia Collusion Insurance Policy was on the up and up? I bet even little old ignorant me knows what you're going to say...
What does little old ignorant you think I'm going to say?
I think you're going to avoid the question.
(10-25-2019, 02:49 PM)flsprtsgod Wrote: [ -> ] (10-25-2019, 02:40 PM)ferocious Wrote: [ -> ]What does little old ignorant you think I'm going to say?
I think you're going to avoid the question.
Pardon the delay in his response. He is trying to figure out which personality belongs to which incognito window.
(10-25-2019, 02:52 PM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote: [ -> ] (10-25-2019, 02:49 PM)flsprtsgod Wrote: [ -> ]I think you're going to avoid the question.
Pardon the delay in his response. He is trying to figure out which personality belongs to which incognito window.
I was avoiding the question.
Does anyone have a comment on Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell's ruling ordering the Justice Department to hand over to the House Judiciary Committee details related to the secret grand jury information from former special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation? Or should wait for Trump's tweet first.
Link:
https://ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/sho...9gj0048-46
(10-24-2019, 09:32 PM)flsprtsgod Wrote: [ -> ]In much more important news, US Attorney John Durham reclassified his investigation into the Russia-gate hoax as a criminal investigation. As you all know, covering up this investigation is the real reason why the Dems are blowing up Impeachment Theater this week, but it will be fun to watch them increase their flailing as the AG gets further along to actual charges.
I think they should be careful, lest they find out that the Russia investigation was well justified by the evidence. Then what?
youtube.com/watch?v=YVjefgCyJvk
(10-25-2019, 03:59 PM)The Real Marty Wrote: [ -> ] (10-24-2019, 09:32 PM)flsprtsgod Wrote: [ -> ]In much more important news, US Attorney John Durham reclassified his investigation into the Russia-gate hoax as a criminal investigation. As you all know, covering up this investigation is the real reason why the Dems are blowing up Impeachment Theater this week, but it will be fun to watch them increase their flailing as the AG gets further along to actual charges.
I think they should be careful, lest they find out that the Russia investigation was well justified by the evidence. Then what?
Have you read the released Page texts from today? Where she admits to altering Flynn's testimony and editing the questions asked of him so that his answers became perjurous months after the deposition? I don't really think any of have to worry that Trump or his team are going to look bad from this DOJ investigation. The Dems had their shot and they Mueller'd it, now the axiom about aiming for the king is going to come to fruition.
(10-25-2019, 04:55 PM)flsprtsgod Wrote: [ -> ] (10-25-2019, 03:59 PM)The Real Marty Wrote: [ -> ]I think they should be careful, lest they find out that the Russia investigation was well justified by the evidence. Then what?
Have you read the released Page texts from today? Where she admits to altering Flynn's testimony and editing the questions asked of him so that his answers became perjurous months after the deposition? I don't really think any of have to worry that Trump or his team are going to look bad from this DOJ investigation. The Dems had their shot and they Mueller'd it, now the axiom about aiming for the king is going to come to fruition.
If I were him I would ignore this post.
(10-25-2019, 04:57 PM)ferocious Wrote: [ -> ] (10-25-2019, 04:55 PM)flsprtsgod Wrote: [ -> ]Have you read the released Page texts from today? Where she admits to altering Flynn's testimony and editing the questions asked of him so that his answers became perjurous months after the deposition? I don't really think any of have to worry that Trump or his team are going to look bad from this DOJ investigation. The Dems had their shot and they Mueller'd it, now the axiom about aiming for the king is going to come to fruition.
If I were him I would ignore this post.
As the great Dan Bongino says, Liberals are allergic to facts and data.
(10-25-2019, 05:10 PM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote: [ -> ] (10-25-2019, 04:57 PM)ferocious Wrote: [ -> ]If I were him I would ignore this post.
As the great Dan Bongino says, Liberals are allergic to facts and data.
I stopped reading when I saw Dan Bongino.
(10-25-2019, 05:12 PM)ferocious Wrote: [ -> ] (10-25-2019, 05:10 PM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote: [ -> ]As the great Dan Bongino says, Liberals are allergic to facts and data.
I stopped reading when I saw Dan Bongino.
And yet you make his point...
(10-25-2019, 05:12 PM)ferocious Wrote: [ -> ] (10-25-2019, 05:10 PM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote: [ -> ]As the great Dan Bongino says, Liberals are allergic to facts and data.
I stopped reading when I saw Dan Bongino.
You are in serious denial about the state of your party, and the electoral process in general.
(10-25-2019, 05:20 PM)ferocious Wrote: [ -> ] (10-25-2019, 05:15 PM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote: [ -> ]You are in serious denial about the state of your party, and the electoral process in general.
I am a Republican.
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAA!!!!
Now we KNOW you're Mikesez!
(10-25-2019, 05:30 PM)flsprtsgod Wrote: [ -> ] (10-25-2019, 05:20 PM)ferocious Wrote: [ -> ]I am a Republican.
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAA!!!!
Now we KNOW you're Mikesez!
We WHO? I had a pretty good idea you and StroudCrowd1 were the same person.
Thanks for clearing it up.
(10-25-2019, 05:36 PM)The Real Marty Wrote: [ -> ] (10-25-2019, 04:55 PM)flsprtsgod Wrote: [ -> ]Have you read the released Page texts from today? Where she admits to altering Flynn's testimony and editing the questions asked of him so that his answers became perjurous months after the deposition? I don't really think any of have to worry that Trump or his team are going to look bad from this DOJ investigation. The Dems had their shot and they Mueller'd it, now the axiom about aiming for the king is going to come to fruition.
Link?
Marty, you called his bluff about the fake link and I just ignored him.
By the inverse of the transitive property of equality, we are not the same person.
Next, StroudCrowd1 will comment. He IS the same person as flsprtgod.