03-28-2017, 12:46 PM
I'd stop watching the NFL if they relocated. It's getting worse every year anyways. I already don't like the fact that the Jaguars only play in Jacksonville 7 times during the regular season.
Quote:How long do ya think Kim Jong Un would put up with pick 6's?He might just have players in the crosshairs of a sniper rifle all game long and let them know about it.
Quote:I can truly say that the Jag fans that live here in the United States do NOT want them to move overseas. However looking at the situation without teal color frames, if the NFL is going to move to London, the Jaguars are the most logical option.
How can anybody deny this? The fact that some here are saying "I've heard it for years" has no relevance. There was no vote scheduled. Now that there is (supposedly), this is a foreseeable event that may take place.
Quote:How are they the most logical option?Let me clarify.
When has the NFL ever 'moved a team'?
Quote:I'd stop watching the NFL if they relocated. It's getting worse every year anyways.
Quote:Could you imagine meeting Kim Jong Un? I could only imagine how close I am to dying at any moment for the simplest mistake.
Quote:Let me clarify.
"If the NFL approves a team to move to London"
Because the Jaguars just are the most logical option.
Think of it this way, say another team (BILLS) move to London. Would the NFL allow other teams to have 1 "home game" in London in addition to the already established home team?
The answer would be NO because that would dig into the established teams fan base/ local revenue, which would be to entire/sole reason a team would move there in the first place.
Do you think the Jaguars are to remain profitable in Jacksonville without a "home" game in London? The Jags would take a HUGE hit in Local revenue if they don't have that home game in London.
The other scenario would be to play in different areas in London which would have different teams having a "home game" every year. But if this happens, we should just have a couple of expansion team over there IMO.
Quote:REGARDING THE EXCHANGE RATE:Yes but if overall other teams players feel cheated just cause in this day and age. Which I don't agree with. But they don't care what I or anyone else thinks. It will cause conflicts amongst the league.
You all do realize that the MLB and NHL deal with this under their cap restrictions for the Canadian teams don't you ? the only difference is that the Canadian Dollar (like the Mexican Peso) is valued less than the US Dollar.
If the NFL can negotiate a $20 Billion Dollar TV Contract, I think they can figure out how to deal with an exchange rate.
Quote:Let me clarify.
"If the NFL approves a team to move to London"
Because the Jaguars just are the most logical option.
Think of it this way, say another team (BILLS) move to London. Would the NFL allow other teams to have 1 "home game" in London in addition to the already established home team?
The answer would be NO because that would dig into the established teams fan base/ local revenue, which would be to entire/sole reason a team would move there in the first place.
Do you think the Jaguars are to remain profitable in Jacksonville without a "home" game in London? The Jags would take a HUGE hit in Local revenue if they don't have that home game in London.
The other scenario would be to play in different areas in London which would have different teams having a "home game" every year. But if this happens, we should just have a couple of expansion team over there IMO.
Quote:So all of this would first assume that the Jaguars would want to move to London.The reasoning Khan would to move have is highlighted. Or did you not read that far?
Quote:The reasoning Khan would to move have is highlighted. Or did you not read that far?
Do you really think Khan would take that revenue hit? If a team is able to move to London, and the state of the jaguars remains consistent with the last few years, you don't think Khan would feel pressure to move before any others? This would sacrifice local revenue which is essentially what makes the Jaguars able to stay in Jacksonville. But as Khan has stated, the local revenue NEEDS to increase in order to remain stable in Jacksonville.
At the end of the day, when we are talking about profitability, owners do NOT care about you. Especially small markets. Moving to a bigger market for an owner would make them forget about you real quick.
I am sorry that this is such a touchy topic. But am i saying anything false? PS I want the Jags to remain in JAX.
Quote:The reasoning Khan would to move have is highlighted. Or did you not read that far?The larger market has to have a real interest though, not a forced one. I have strong ties in England. And the main sport remains the world cup. And that will not change.
Do you really think Khan would take that revenue hit? If a team is able to move to London, and the state of the jaguars remains consistent with the last few years, you don't think Khan would feel pressure to move before any others? This would sacrifice local revenue which is essentially what makes the Jaguars able to stay in Jacksonville. But as Khan has stated, the local revenue NEEDS to increase in order to remain stable in Jacksonville.
At the end of the day, when we are talking about profitability, owners do NOT care about you. Especially small markets. Moving to a bigger market for an owner would make them forget about you real quick.
I am sorry that this is such a touchy topic. But am i saying anything false? PS I want the Jags to remain in JAX.
Quote:This thread is an ideal way to demonstrate the difference between ignorance and stupidity.
Ignorant people write articles about the Jaguars moving to London.
Stupid people believe these articles.
Quote:And do you understand that the only reason that teams have moved have been stadium issues?http://www.jaguars.com/media-gallery/vid...a76c0f4088