Jacksonville Jaguars Fan Forums

Quote:Are people really saying they would rather play against Luck than Hassellbeck??!!!


What is wrong with this board?!

Either QB will throw for 300 yds 3 TDs 0 picks on Sunday. I'd be less embarrassed if it was Luck.

Per rotoworld:

Quote:Luck (shoulder) not throwing at practice

Andrew Luck | IND


(October 1, 2015 1:28 PM EDT)

Andrew Luck (shoulder) was limited at Thursday's practice.


Luck took snaps under center but didn't throw any passes. It's the second day in a row he's been limited. The injury isn't considered serious and this is likely a case of the Colts simply being extra cautious with their franchise player. We're still expecting Luck to play Sunday against Jacksonville.


SOURCE: NFL.COM

Quote:Per rotoworld:

Second day in a row he hasn't thrown any passes, but it's not serious? Hmmmmmm

Quote:Second day in a row he hasn't thrown any passes, but it's not serious? Hmmmmmm

All I know is we better have some blitz packages together and hit him hard in the process.

Quote:All I know is we better have some blitz packages together and hit him hard in the process.

After that soft D last week, I sure hope so.

Bust

I have Luck on my fantasy team but I'm starting Bortles......

 

I have faith in this team

Quote:All I know is we better have some blitz packages together and hit him hard in the process.

Good luck waiting for that.

I tell you what, if Luck doesn't play there will be a lot pressure on Gus to win this game, if you can't beat the Colts without Luck who can you beat? The Jaguars need to take advantage of this opportunity otherwise heads are going to roll.

 

http://www.rotoworld.com/player/nfl/6439/andrew-luck

If Luck doesn't play and we still lose, Gus needs to be fired immediately. It would be a total embarrassment

Quote:If Luck doesn't play and we still lose, Gus needs to be fired immediately. It would be a total embarrassment

You mean like when we would lose to Charlie Whitehurst?

Quote:If Luck doesn't play and we still lose, Gus needs to be fired immediately. It would be a total embarrassment

 

Yea I'm normally not a fan of this but DC would have to consider it.

Quote:You mean like when we would lose to Charlie Whitehurst?

 

Haha so true

Quote:Yea I'm normally not a fan of this but DC would have to consider it.

You dont lose to a 40 year old quarterback, when you claim the team is built.

Quote:You dont lose to a 40 year old quarterback, when you claim the team is built.

 

Not one by name of Matt Hasselbeck 

Queue the "I want to play them at full strength"er's in ...3....2....1.....

Of course I want Luck to play so we can beat a "healthy" colts team but Ill take a win anyway I can!

jags need to win this one with or without luck . claiming to be built means being able to take the division no matter what . you don't build to come in second

Quote:Queue the "I want to play them at full strength"er's in ...3....2....1.....

And I replied right after you posted... perfect timing

Quote:And I replied right after you posted... perfect timing

 

Haha. Funny.

 

I believe in playing a team at less than 100% whenever you can. We are what we are. Winning makes people happy and potentially puts us in solo 1st in AFCS after the 1st quarter of the season. When is the last time that happened?