Oh noes! PP is set to kill all blacks!!! Run for the hills! Grab your pitchforks!!! So silly...
"As part of her efforts to promote birth control, Sanger found common cause with proponents of eugenics, believing that they both sought to "assist the race toward the elimination of the unfit."<sup>
[94]</sup> Sanger was a proponent of negative eugenics, which aims to improve human hereditary traits through social intervention by reducing the reproduction of those who were considered unfit.<sup>
[95]</sup>
<p style="color:rgb(37,37,37);font-family
ans-serif;">In “The Morality of Birth Control,” a 1921 speech, she divided society into three groups: the educated and informed class that regulated the size of their families, the intelligent and responsible who desired to control their families however did not have the means or the knowledge and the irresponsible and reckless people whose religious scruples "prevent their exercising control over their numbers.” Sanger concludes “there is no doubt in the minds of all thinking people that the procreation of this group should be stopped.”<sup>
[96]</sup>
<p style="color:rgb(37,37,37);font-family
ans-serif;">Sanger's eugenic policies included an exclusionary immigration policy, free access to birth control methods and full
family planningautonomy for the able-minded, and compulsory segregation or sterilization for the "profoundly [BLEEP]".<sup>
[97]</sup><sup>
[98]</sup> In her book <i>The Pivot of Civilization</i>, she advocated coercion to prevent the "undeniably feeble-minded" from procreating.<sup>
[99]</sup>
<p style="color:rgb(37,37,37);font-family
ans-serif;">Although Sanger supported negative eugenics, she asserted that eugenics alone was not sufficient, and that birth control was essential to achieve her goals.<sup>
[100]</sup><sup>
[101]</sup><sup>
[102]</sup>
<p style="color:rgb(37,37,37);font-family
ans-serif;">In contrast with eugenicist William Robinson, who advocated
euthanasia for the unfit,<sup>
[note 8]</sup> Sanger wrote, "we [do not] believe that the community could or should send to the lethal chamber the defective progeny resulting from irresponsible and unintelligent breeding."<sup>
[103]</sup>Similarly, Sanger denounced the aggressive and lethal
Nazi eugenics program.<sup>
[98]</sup> In addition, Sanger believed the responsibility for birth control should remain in the hands of able-minded individual parents rather than the state, and that self-determining motherhood was the only unshakable foundation for racial betterment.<sup>
[100]</sup><sup>
[104]</sup>
<p style="color:rgb(37,37,37);font-family
ans-serif;">Sanger also supported restrictive immigration policies. In "A Plan for Peace", a 1932 essay, she proposed a
congressional department to address population problems. She also recommended that immigration exclude those "whose condition is known to be detrimental to the stamina of the race," and that sterilization and segregation be applied to those with incurable, hereditary disabilities.<sup>
[97]</sup><sup>
[98]</sup><sup>
[105]</sup>"
Again, the purpose of PP is not wipe out one race. But yeah, go ahead and try to demonize the founder in order to further your agenda. Again, it doesn't matter what Sanger's philosophies are in terms of PP. Unless your goal is to muddy the waters... Which it's clear some's are.
If you disagree with abortion, so be it. But don't try and tell me that the reason PP should go away is because the founder (and thus the organization now) has some racist purpose of killing blacks.