Quote:I know you are desperately trying to turn this personal, but if you can't answer the question move on.
So let's say for argument sake that all prison owners are white.. What's your point? Are they considered slave owners because criminals gave up their freedoms to be criminals?
Quote:My point is Black people do not own private prisons where they make a profit off the inmate population.
That's where you are very wrong logically. I would say that perhaps millions of black people have 401k's or mutual funds that invest in the corporations that run private prisons. Owning shares of a company means that you have partial ownership.
Quote:I'll answer it for you since you seem to think that it really matters. I would say that it depends on the number of Black CEO's. My guess is that the majority of them have stock portfolios and of the ones that do greater than half probably own stock in the corporations that do run private prisons.
I still don't get the point of your question that you are so desperate to get answered.
Stop guessing the portfolios of Black CEO's and provide facts.
It's nothing about being desperate to get a question answered. Flsptsgd said yes Black CEO's own prisons and I'm asking for specific proof.
It's not that hard to understand.
Quote:That's where you are very wrong logically. I would say that perhaps millions of black people have 401k's or mutual funds that invest in the corporations that run private prisons. Owning shares of a company means that you have partial ownership.
I'm not talking about partial ownership I'm talking about majority.
Quote:So let's say for argument sake that all prison owners are white.. What's your point? Are they considered slave owners because criminals gave up their freedoms to be criminals?
Your are trying to be funny by referencing white CEO's of prison system as slave owners.
Quote:Stop guessing the portfolios of Black CEO's and provide facts.
It's nothing about being desperate to get a question answered. Flsptsgd said yes Black CEO's own prisons and I'm asking for specific proof.
It's not that hard to understand.
Then how hard is it for you to understand that you can't disprove it either? Which is the more likely case?
Quote:I'm not talking about partial ownership I'm talking about majority.
Again, what difference does it make? Does it matter if a black man owns 1% of a corporation that runs private prisons vs. a black man that owns > 50%? Either way, that black man owns private prisons.
Quote:Then how hard is it for you to understand that you can't disprove it either? Which is the more likely case?
He presented his response as a fact and I'm asking for proof. It's not my responsibility to disprove his "fact" black people own prisons.
Quote:Again, what difference does it make? Does it matter if a black man owns 1% of a corporation that runs private prisons vs. a black man that owns > 50%? Either way, that black man owns private prisons.
Again how do you equate someone owing 1% of a company as a majority owner?
Quote:He presented his response as a fact and I'm asking for proof. It's not my responsibility to disprove his "fact" black people own prisons.
You're the one that so desperately wants proof one way or the other. Why don't you find out for yourself?
Let me ask you this. Are all private prisons owned by white people?
Quote:Again how do you equate someone owing 1% of a company as a majority owner?
Because regardless of how much of a company somebody owns, they are still an owner. You're just trying to move the goal posts when you didn't like the initial answers that you were given. Face it. Black people, both men and woman own private prisons.
Quote:Because regardless of how much of a company somebody owns, they are still an owner. You're just trying to move the goal posts when you didn't like the initial answers that you were given. Face it. Black people, both men and woman own private prisons.
Nobody is trying to move the goal post. The argument is simple, do Black people hold a majority as CEO's in the privatization of prisons. You are trying to add to something that I'm am not asking regardless whether I like the answer or not.
Quote:You're the one that so desperately wants proof one way or the other. Why don't you find out for yourself?
Let me ask you this. Are all private prisons owned by white people?
Now you are trying to move the goal post.
You tell me if private prisons are owned by white people.
Quote:Nobody is trying to move the goal post. The argument is simple, do Black people hold a majority as CEO's in the privatization of prisons. You are trying to add to something that I'm am not asking regardless whether I like the answer or not.
That's not the original question that has already been answered. I'm done with this stupid back-and-forth with you. I don't see what this has to do with the OP anyway.
Quote:That's not the original question that has already been answered. I'm done with this stupid back-and-forth with you. I don't see what this has to do with the OP anyway.
Yes it EXACTLY does!
You are done with the convo because you convinced yourself that if a black person owns a 1% stake somehow they are a MAJORITY owner.
Quote:Do blacks own prisons?
Quote:Name one BLACK CEO who own a prison.
I'm not talking about investors, or stockholders.
Quote:My point is Black people do not own private prisons where they make a profit off the inmate population.
Quote:I'm not talking about partial ownership I'm talking about majority.
So somehow JFC suddenly thinks that I said a 1% ownership of a company is a majority owner.
Quote:Name one BLACK CEO who own a prison.
I'm not talking about investors, or stockholders.
CEOs of public corporations arent "owners", but you can wear yourself out moving those goalposts.
Quote:Your point is false.
You can't even give JFC an E for effort.. Cause there isn't any..
Quote:So somehow JFC suddenly thinks that I said a 1% ownership of a company is a majority owner.
I thought you was done with this thread.
So lets recap for about the 5th time now.
A black person who owns 1% does not translate into majority ownership.