Quote:I just saw this. I am actually Libertarian. I voted for Johnson/Weld yesterday. I really thought about it standing at that voting booth and I just couldn't vote Trump. I know it's seen as a vote for Clinton but I just couldn't circle in that bubble next to Trump/Pence. I refuse to vote for the lesser of two evils if my party is available as a choice. I've done it in the past to no avail and I won't do it again.
I just wish there were a better 3rd party candidate. A Ross Perot in this day and age could have had a decent chance.
Quote:Average Joe must include Hillary Clinton then considering she lost $6 billion at the State Department as Secretary of State, and nobody has any idea where it went. Someone needs to check the deposit slips at her family slush fund.
They didn't take the $6m. I'm sure Chelsea is maxed out on her college debt after attending Stanford. She'll be making those monthly payments for the next 20 years.
Quote:Average Joe must include Hillary Clinton then considering she lost $6 billion at the State Department as Secretary of State, and nobody has any idea where it went. Someone needs to check the deposit slips at her family slush fund.
You like banging your head against a wall, don't you?
That's how I feel when trying to reason with her. The headaches weren't worth it anymore.
Quote:No puppet, no puppet. You're the puppet.
That was a very well worded deflection. It doesn't exain how you all justify an obvious double standard at best.
That wasn't a deflection. It was an historic account of how your messiah became president. He wasn't qualified beyond the very basics. Can you debunk that? His resume as a state senator was mostly about voting present and not presenting any new legislation. When he got to the US Senate, he started running for president almost as soon as he arrived in DC. Which part of that is a deflection?
Quote:So FBT is the puppet here, not the person he calls a puppet.
Please just put a sock in it. You don't have a clue what you're talking about beyond what you're parroting from elsewhere. You're the very definition of a puppet if ever there was one.
Quote:They didn't take the $6m. I'm sure Chelsea is maxed out on her college debt after attending Stanford. She'll be making those monthly payments for the next 20 years.
What's the amortization schedule for a 20 year note on $6 billion at, say, 5% interest?
Who am I kidding. If it's student loans, Hillary is going to forgive them all, right? ESPECIALLY that one!
Quote:I just wish there were a better 3rd party candidate. A Ross Perot in this day and age could have had a decent chance.
I really like Adrian Peterson but he wasn't chosen as the nominee for reasons I can't fathom. I watched several of his debates with Johnson and McAfee and he schooled them both, which may not say much all things considered. I have a feeling he could hold his own against better candidates.
Quote:I just wish there were a better 3rd party candidate. A Ross Perot in this day and age could have had a decent chance.
Nope.
Regardless of truth, far too many are sticking with their girl. In today's climate, leaving the D when logic dictates will never happen for most that are religiously faithful to the D.
Any significant third party would only serve to give the D a permanence. The irony being a strong third party would effectively turn us into a single party despotism.
There is no independent thought within the vast majority of the D party, and rarely do they appeal to the independent voter.
Just look at the independent vote Trump has been able to pull.
If the party formerly known as Republican were to have that loyalty rate, this race would have been a landslide for him.
The D saw that strength in solidarity when they were handed their butts to them in 1994. The GWB win in 2000 caused it to go nuclear. The D party had nearly dissolved, but once they stopped pitching their ideas and started smear attacking the R party - they turned it around. They found strength in stopping the fighting amongst themselves and turning that energy against what they considered their "enemy," and finally found a message they could sell that worked - since the R was ignorant to the strategy of smear. They assumed they would simply continue winning the battle of ideas by sticking to substance and not engage or fight back the personal attacks.
Well, now the tables have turned. Hopefully they will realize they were wrong not to fight back, and that superior ideas alone no longer win as they once did. The misinformation and dirty attacks must be fought back against.
If not, the D will bully their way to a permanence to the detriment of our nation.
Quote:It will be at least one of my proudest moments. A vote for Trump is a vote to take back our nation and to make America great again. Trump wants to fix the economy by bringing back American jobs, lowering taxes across the board, and by re-negotiating ridiculous trade deals. He's also going to fix our health care system in part by getting rid of the atrocity known as Obamacare.
On the other hand, a vote for Hillary is a vote to raise our taxes, to remove our borders, and to take a blind eye toward White House corruption. Actually, a vote for Hillary is really a vote for Tim Kaine since she's going to be impeached.
Do you earn over $250,000 annually? If not, Hillary Clinton will not raise your taxes.
By lowering taxes for people who do earn that much every year, Donald Trump would allow America to go deeper in debt because he will not have enough money to solve some of the problems facing us today. I know the people who need tax breaks are the poor citizens who live paycheck to paycheck or don't even get paychecks, not the rich guys on Wall Street.
Quote:Do you earn over $250,000 annually? If not, Hillary Clinton will not raise your taxes.
By lowering taxes for people who do earn that much every year, Donald Trump would allow America to go deeper in debt because he will not have enough money to solve some of the problems facing us today. I know the people who need tax breaks are the poor citizens who live paycheck to paycheck or don't even get paychecks, not the rich guys on Wall Street.
You keep telling yourself that. Hillary is a liar. To cover the cost of everything she's promising you, the middle class is going to get hammered. I don't care what her plan says because it's all make believe to begin with.
Government is taking in record tax revenues every month. We don't have a tax revenue problem in this country. We have a government that can't control spending. You're clueless.
BTW, those poor citizens you're talking about probably aren't paying taxes to begin with, so what kind of tax breaks do you give someone who isn't already paying them? Please, tell us how that works.
FYI, you're talking about the rich guys on Wall Street who are fully in bed with your girl, Hillary Clinton. Are you naïve enough to think she's going to punish those who are financing her lifestyle of the rich and famous?
Quote:You like banging your head against a wall, don't you? That's how I feel when trying to reason with her. The headaches weren't worth it anymore.
Good news:
www.factcheck.org debunked the lie about the State Department losing $6 million. Click on that link and search 2016 Presidential Debates if you want to know what really happened.
Quote:You keep telling yourself that. Hillary is a liar. To cover the cost of everything she's promising you, the middle class is going to get hammered. I don't care what her plan says because it's all make believe to begin with.
Government is taking in record tax revenues every month. We don't have a tax revenue problem in this country. We have a government that can't control spending. You're clueless.
I am telling everyone else that, not myself. There is no reason to believe just because someone is a proven liar, every single word out of her mouth is a lie.
Quote:I am telling everyone else that, not myself. There is no reason to believe just because someone is a proven liar, every single word out of her mouth is a lie.
Wow. It just gets more and more ridiculous. You should seriously get your mom to bring a hammer and smash that computer to bits.
Quote:Wow. It just gets more and more ridiculous. You should seriously get your mom to bring a hammer and smash that computer to bits.
Why is a moderator allowed to say stuff like this? If you were a regular poster like me I would report a lo/t of your posts.
Wrong again.
Putting people back to work raises the tax revenues, as they did in the last great boom under Reagan's tax cuts.
Businesses grow their companies and people are put back to work when given tax relief. The policies that hurt businesses are why the economy is in it's current stagnation and being held back.
No one deserves their taxes to be raised. The so-called "rich" are soaked for what is already very much more than their fair share.
The top 1% pay nearly half of all tax revenue.
Nearly half of all citizens pay no tax at all.
That's more than "fair share."
You've fallen for the divisive rhetoric of the D. Pitting one class against another. The real fight is all citizens vs their out of control federal government.
It goes both ways. Republicans also fall for divisive rhetoric.
Quote:Why is a moderator allowed to say stuff like this? If you were a regular poster like me I would report a lo/t of your posts.
We can't speak the truth?
What's stopping you from reporting my posts exposing your ignorance?
Quote:We can't speak the truth?
What's stopping you from reporting my posts exposing your ignorance?
Telling me I need to stop posting and should smash my computer is exactly what people I have reported posts have done.