Jacksonville Jaguars Fan Forums

(01-01-2023, 01:15 PM)WingerDinger Wrote: [ -> ]

Anyone wanna take a crack at this one?

It's like watching a dog take a turd in your yard and solving for X at the same time. A map to nowhere..

Unless you want to ban people from dressing and identifying as they choose, or allow large employers to discriminate based on gender, there is nothing to be said.  
"I wouldn't do that" or "that makes me uncomfortable" isn't a political statement.
So, if you have nothing political to say, say nothing at all in the political forum.

(01-01-2023, 01:15 PM)WingerDinger Wrote: [ -> ]

Anyone wanna take a crack at this one?

It's like watching a dog take a turd in your yard and solving for X at the same time. A map to nowhere..

The birther in this case still had a uterus. So biologically it was still a female, and it chose to conveniently renonuce its emotional commitment to transgenderism and appropriate the sex that it was assigned all along in order to respond to maternal feelings that it was correctly born with before it made the choice to pervert biology and go down the twisted road of transgenderism.  It renounced transgenderism with this action, and probably doesnt even realize it.  And it is now most likely being lauded as brave and a hero.  For behaving the way it was designed. There is no wrong with this movement. Just self-applied bravery and courage.

And, btw, did i miss something? Doesnt the partner with the [BLEEP] eating grin have any sperm to contribute? Or is that one originally a female? Why was a donor needed?

---

(01-01-2023, 07:51 PM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ]

(01-01-2023, 01:15 PM)WingerDinger Wrote: [ -> ]

Anyone wanna take a crack at this one?

It's like watching a dog take a turd in your yard and solving for X at the same time. A map to nowhere..

Unless you want to ban people from dressing and identifying as they choose, or allow large employers to discriminate based on gender, there is nothing to be said.  
"I wouldn't do that" or "that makes me uncomfortable" isn't a political statement.
So, if you have nothing political to say, say nothing at all in the political forum.

This is a political topic, because the advocates of this are making it as such, and thus is fair game for commentary of any kind.
But by all means, please feel free to follow your own advice.

Mikey is ok with the destruction of norms and definitions as long as he's told it's ok by the right people.

I think they're both biological females. One is pretending to be male while the other is 'fluid'. So, they had to get the juicy juice from a guy who pretends to be a female.

Maybe? Perhaps?

---

(01-01-2023, 09:17 PM)Lucky2Last Wrote: [ -> ]Mikey is ok with the destruction of norms and definitions as long as he's told it's ok by the right people.

I don't disagree with his point. My only difference is if this bleeds over into demands that everyone participate in their gender charades.

(01-01-2023, 09:04 PM)NewJagsCity Wrote: [ -> ]

(01-01-2023, 01:15 PM)WingerDinger Wrote: [ -> ]

Anyone wanna take a crack at this one?

It's like watching a dog take a turd in your yard and solving for X at the same time. A map to nowhere..

The birther in this case still had a uterus. So biologically it was still a female, and it chose to conveniently renonuce its emotional commitment to transgenderism and appropriate the sex that it was assigned all along in order to respond to maternal feelings that it was correctly born with before it made the choice to pervert biology and go down the twisted road of transgenderism.  It renounced transgenderism with this action, and probably doesnt even realize it.  And it is now most likely being lauded as brave and a hero.  For behaving the way it was designed. There is no wrong with this movement. Just self-applied bravery and courage.

And, btw, did i miss something? Doesnt the partner with the [BLEEP] eating grin have any sperm to contribute?  Or is that one originally a female?  Why was a donor needed?

---

(01-01-2023, 07:51 PM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ]Unless you want to ban people from dressing and identifying as they choose, or allow large employers to discriminate based on gender, there is nothing to be said.  
"I wouldn't do that" or "that makes me uncomfortable" isn't a political statement.
So, if you have nothing political to say, say nothing at all in the political forum.

This is a political topic, because the advocates of this are making it as such, and thus is fair game for commentary of any kind.
But by all means, please feel free to follow your own advice.

How are the adults and child in that Twitter post making their situation a political topic?

(01-01-2023, 09:40 PM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ]

(01-01-2023, 09:04 PM)NewJagsCity Wrote: [ -> ]The birther in this case still had a uterus. So biologically it was still a female, and it chose to conveniently renonuce its emotional commitment to transgenderism and appropriate the sex that it was assigned all along in order to respond to maternal feelings that it was correctly born with before it made the choice to pervert biology and go down the twisted road of transgenderism.  It renounced transgenderism with this action, and probably doesnt even realize it.  And it is now most likely being lauded as brave and a hero.  For behaving the way it was designed. There is no wrong with this movement. Just self-applied bravery and courage.

And, btw, did i miss something? Doesnt the partner with the [BLEEP] eating grin have any sperm to contribute?  Or is that one originally a female?  Why was a donor needed?

---

This is a political topic, because the advocates of this are making it as such, and thus is fair game for commentary of any kind.
But by all means, please feel free to follow your own advice.

How are the adults and child in that Twitter post making their situation a political topic?

Go talk about this topic in any other thread, not in the political forum and see what happens..

I dare you.. I double dog dare you. 

Stick your tongue to the frozen pole, Flick..

(01-01-2023, 09:40 PM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ]

(01-01-2023, 09:04 PM)NewJagsCity Wrote: [ -> ]The birther in this case still had a uterus. So biologically it was still a female, and it chose to conveniently renonuce its emotional commitment to transgenderism and appropriate the sex that it was assigned all along in order to respond to maternal feelings that it was correctly born with before it made the choice to pervert biology and go down the twisted road of transgenderism.  It renounced transgenderism with this action, and probably doesnt even realize it.  And it is now most likely being lauded as brave and a hero.  For behaving the way it was designed. There is no wrong with this movement. Just self-applied bravery and courage.

And, btw, did i miss something? Doesnt the partner with the [BLEEP] eating grin have any sperm to contribute?  Or is that one originally a female?  Why was a donor needed?

---

This is a political topic, because the advocates of this are making it as such, and thus is fair game for commentary of any kind.
But by all means, please feel free to follow your own advice.

How are the adults and child in that Twitter post making their situation a political topic?

A man CANNOT give birth and a female CANNOT donate sperm.  What part of that don't you understand?

(01-02-2023, 06:57 AM)Sneakers Wrote: [ -> ]

(01-01-2023, 09:40 PM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ]How are the adults and child in that Twitter post making their situation a political topic?

A man CANNOT give birth and a female CANNOT donate sperm.  What part of that don't you understand?

I understand all of that.  But that's biology,  not politics.
What law do you want to change?

---

(01-01-2023, 09:43 PM)WingerDinger Wrote: [ -> ]

(01-01-2023, 09:40 PM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ]How are the adults and child in that Twitter post making their situation a political topic?

Go talk about this topic in any other thread, not in the political forum and see what happens..

I dare you.. I double dog dare you. 

Stick your tongue to the frozen pole, Flick..

People will get touchy and attack each other.  Still doesn't mean it's a political topic.  People get touchy and attacking over religion and sports as well.

Yes, this is how the US government works lately.... They don't work for us anymore, they only work to retain their power over us........

(01-02-2023, 08:04 AM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ]

(01-02-2023, 06:57 AM)Sneakers Wrote: [ -> ]A man CANNOT give birth and a female CANNOT donate sperm.  What part of that don't you understand?

I understand all of that.  But that's biology,  not politics.
What law do you want to change?

---

In this case biology is being denied for political reasons.  Stop being a mindless puppet of the Left and start using your brain.  

Here's the headline.  I've run a strikethrough the words that make it political.  "Transgender man gives birth to non-binary partner's baby with female sperm donor."  You just admitted that a man cannot give birth and a female cannot donate sperm.  So, ask yourself, "Why is this even a story?" 

P.S.  The sexual orientation of the partner (or existence of a partner at all) is irrelevant, so why is it even mentioned?

(01-02-2023, 08:04 AM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ]

(01-02-2023, 06:57 AM)Sneakers Wrote: [ -> ]A man CANNOT give birth and a female CANNOT donate sperm.  What part of that don't you understand?

I understand all of that.  But that's biology,  not politics.
What law do you want to change?

---

(01-01-2023, 09:43 PM)WingerDinger Wrote: [ -> ]Go talk about this topic in any other thread, not in the political forum and see what happens..

I dare you.. I double dog dare you. 

Stick your tongue to the frozen pole, Flick..

People will get touchy and attack each other.  Still doesn't mean it's a political topic.  People get touchy and attacking over religion and sports as well.

Even after a double dog dare..

Wuss..

(01-02-2023, 10:38 AM)Sneakers Wrote: [ -> ]

(01-02-2023, 08:04 AM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ]I understand all of that.  But that's biology,  not politics.
What law do you want to change?

---

In this case biology is being denied for political reasons.  Stop being a mindless puppet of the Left and start using your brain.  

Here's the headline.  I've run a strikethrough the words that make it political.  "Transgender man gives birth to non-binary partner's baby with female sperm donor."  You just admitted that a man cannot give birth and a female cannot donate sperm.  So, ask yourself, "Why is this even a story?" 

P.S.  The sexual orientation of the partner (or existence of a partner at all) is irrelevant, so why is it even mentioned?

It's a story because it's provocative and unusual.  What do you want to do about it? Tell the newspaper not to publish the story? I suppose you could boycott them.  In a sense that's what I'm already doing and what you should do too.  Ignore it.

(01-02-2023, 08:04 AM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ]

(01-02-2023, 06:57 AM)Sneakers Wrote: [ -> ]A man CANNOT give birth and a female CANNOT donate sperm.  What part of that don't you understand?

I understand all of that.  But that's biology,  not politics.
What law do you want to change?

---

(01-01-2023, 09:43 PM)WingerDinger Wrote: [ -> ]Go talk about this topic in any other thread, not in the political forum and see what happens..

I dare you.. I double dog dare you. 

Stick your tongue to the frozen pole, Flick..

People will get touchy and attack each other.  Still doesn't mean it's a political topic.  People get touchy and attacking over religion and sports as well.

#Truth

Except the Democrats made this a political issue. They run on this platform, ergo; political.

(01-02-2023, 11:18 AM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ]

(01-02-2023, 10:38 AM)Sneakers Wrote: [ -> ]In this case biology is being denied for political reasons.  Stop being a mindless puppet of the Left and start using your brain.  

Here's the headline.  I've run a strikethrough the words that make it political.  "Transgender man gives birth to non-binary partner's baby with female sperm donor."  You just admitted that a man cannot give birth and a female cannot donate sperm.  So, ask yourself, "Why is this even a story?" 

P.S.  The sexual orientation of the partner (or existence of a partner at all) is irrelevant, so why is it even mentioned?

It's a story because it's provocative and unusual.  What do you want to do about it? Tell the newspaper not to publish the story? I suppose you could boycott them.  In a sense that's what I'm already doing and what you should do too.  Ignore it.

Do you take this same approach with your yard during the summer?

(01-02-2023, 03:06 PM)NewJagsCity Wrote: [ -> ]

(01-02-2023, 11:18 AM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ]It's a story because it's provocative and unusual.  What do you want to do about it? Tell the newspaper not to publish the story? I suppose you could boycott them.  In a sense that's what I'm already doing and what you should do too.  Ignore it.

Do you take this same approach with your yard during the summer?

If so, it wouldn't be a yard, would be a meadow lolol

(01-02-2023, 03:06 PM)NewJagsCity Wrote: [ -> ]

(01-02-2023, 11:18 AM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ]It's a story because it's provocative and unusual.  What do you want to do about it? Tell the newspaper not to publish the story? I suppose you could boycott them.  In a sense that's what I'm already doing and what you should do too.  Ignore it.

Do you take this same approach with your yard during the summer?

My yard is my property and my responsibility. 
Other peoples' kids, not in the same way.  I'm not a teacher.

You're a puppet.

(01-02-2023, 11:18 AM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ]

(01-02-2023, 10:38 AM)Sneakers Wrote: [ -> ]In this case biology is being denied for political reasons.  Stop being a mindless puppet of the Left and start using your brain.  

Here's the headline.  I've run a strikethrough the words that make it political.  "Transgender man gives birth to non-binary partner's baby with female sperm donor."  You just admitted that a man cannot give birth and a female cannot donate sperm.  So, ask yourself, "Why is this even a story?" 

P.S.  The sexual orientation of the partner (or existence of a partner at all) is irrelevant, so why is it even mentioned?

It's a story because it's provocative and unusual.  What do you want to do about it? Tell the newspaper not to publish the story? I suppose you could boycott them.  In a sense that's what I'm already doing and what you should do too.  Ignore it.

A biological woman was impregnated by the sperm of a biological male and gave birth.  How is that provocative or unusual?  It happened 134 million times last year alone worldwide.