(10-03-2024, 05:15 PM)NYC4jags Wrote: [ -> ]Another Trump voter fraud accomplice sentenced - and of course the new Jack Smith filings are set to remove Trump's SCOTUS immunity for his criminal actions in setting out to alter election results
https://twitter.com/acnewsitics/status/1...7705233455
She's a hero, a political martyr, for attempting to bring the Dominion election theft to light. That's why she must be squashed under the heel of the government, can't have anyone proving their lies are in fact lies.
So what's the over/under of Joe pardoning Hunter before January?
(11-06-2024, 05:41 PM)WingerDinger Wrote: [ -> ]So what's the over/under of Joe pardoning Hunter before January?
It's the only thing he was negotiating for during what was otherwise an internal party coup, so I'd say it's almost certainly going to happen in the 11th hour.
(11-06-2024, 06:20 PM)TDOSS Wrote: [ -> ]https://twitter.com/yashar/status/185423...87493?s=08
Got exactly what he ran for.
This country is going to [BLEEP].
You do know that Jack Smith was never legally appointed as a Special Prosecutor, right? That the corrupt Biden DOJ created that position out of thin air without the required agreement of Congress, yes? Are you upset about this or is it all good since you just care about sticking it to the Magats or whatever toddler like description you use in your TikToks?
(11-08-2024, 09:02 AM)flsprtsgod Wrote: [ -> ] (11-06-2024, 06:20 PM)TDOSS Wrote: [ -> ]https://twitter.com/yashar/status/185423...87493?s=08
Got exactly what he ran for.
This country is going to [BLEEP].
You do know that Jack Smith was never legally appointed as a Special Prosecutor, right? That the corrupt Biden DOJ created that position out of thin air without the required agreement of Congress, yes? Are you upset about this or is it all good since you just care about sticking it to the Magats or whatever toddler like description you use in your TikToks?
Actually yes. A special prosecutor is required to be appointed by the president and confirmed by congress. The DOJ appointed him without going thru that process. This means everything he did was, has done or will do is not legal. The judges that were over the cases have liability as well. No federal case can survive appeal.
The New York charges he was convicted of are by New York law misdemeanors. not felonies. The prosecutor had been the #3 person in the DOJ. He quit his job and got hired by the New York DA to prosecute the case. The judge allowed evidence that is unconstitutional to be used. This case will not survive appeal and if an investigation is done there is liability for all involved. Why do you think the judge that is considering vacating the conviction.
He is negotiating to save his butt.
Ya'll gonna be blue in the face trying to explain that to someone who refuses to listen..
(11-08-2024, 09:38 AM)Jag149 Wrote: [ -> ] (11-08-2024, 09:02 AM)flsprtsgod Wrote: [ -> ]You do know that Jack Smith was never legally appointed as a Special Prosecutor, right? That the corrupt Biden DOJ created that position out of thin air without the required agreement of Congress, yes? Are you upset about this or is it all good since you just care about sticking it to the Magats or whatever toddler like description you use in your TikToks?
Actually yes. A special prosecutor is required to be appointed by the president and confirmed by congress. The DOJ appointed him without going thru that process. This means everything he did was, has done or will do is not legal. The judges that were over the cases have liability as well. No federal case can survive appeal.
The New York charges he was convicted of are by New York law misdemeanors. not felonies. The prosecutor had been the #3 person in the DOJ. He quit his job and got hired by the New York DA to prosecute the case. The judge allowed evidence that is unconstitutional to be used. This case will not survive appeal and if an investigation is done there is liability for all involved. Why do you think the judge that is considering vacating the conviction.
He is negotiating to save his butt.
Your first paragraph is mostly false and a trivial technicality even if it were true. Garland or Biden could have easily transferred Smith's charge to a prosecutor who was appointed by the Senate if it went that way.
Your second paragraph is mostly true. Anyone who does business in New York violates New York law. There is no real way to comply.
(11-08-2024, 10:27 AM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ] (11-08-2024, 09:38 AM)Jag149 Wrote: [ -> ]Actually yes. A special prosecutor is required to be appointed by the president and confirmed by congress. The DOJ appointed him without going thru that process. This means everything he did was, has done or will do is not legal. The judges that were over the cases have liability as well. No federal case can survive appeal.
The New York charges he was convicted of are by New York law misdemeanors. not felonies. The prosecutor had been the #3 person in the DOJ. He quit his job and got hired by the New York DA to prosecute the case. The judge allowed evidence that is unconstitutional to be used. This case will not survive appeal and if an investigation is done there is liability for all involved. Why do you think the judge that is considering vacating the conviction.
He is negotiating to save his butt.
Your first paragraph is mostly false and a trivial technicality even if it were true. Garland or Biden could have easily transferred Smith's charge to a prosecutor who was appointed by the Senate if it went that way.
Your second paragraph is mostly true. Anyone who does business in New York violates New York law. There is no real way to comply.
Incorrect. The process was not followed. I believe you should just jump in there with them....lol
(11-08-2024, 10:39 AM)Jag149 Wrote: [ -> ] (11-08-2024, 10:27 AM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ]Your first paragraph is mostly false and a trivial technicality even if it were true. Garland or Biden could have easily transferred Smith's charge to a prosecutor who was appointed by the Senate if it went that way.
Your second paragraph is mostly true. Anyone who does business in New York violates New York law. There is no real way to comply.
Incorrect. The process was not followed. I believe you should just jump in there with them....lol
Oh look Sneakers has an alt.
Even with two of you, I still know more than you.
(11-08-2024, 11:20 AM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ] (11-08-2024, 10:39 AM)Jag149 Wrote: [ -> ]Incorrect. The process was not followed. I believe you should just jump in there with them....lol
Oh look Sneakers has an alt.
Even with two of you, I still know more than you.
I believe you just made my point. By the way sneakers is a bar across from the Lifeguard building what the heck are you talking about? I am a building?
No. The system just unilaterally caved because Trump is President and you can't prosecute a sitting President but you can prosecute a President who left office even though that was never done before because these crimes were so heinous.
(11-22-2024, 11:20 PM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote: [ -> ]Any updates to this?
Therapists are raking in the $$$ and there's a run on Crayola and hot cocoa futures..
![[Image: e3cd9f5d-e7b5-4eec-8e18-f33766290b67_text.gif]](https://y.yarn.co/e3cd9f5d-e7b5-4eec-8e18-f33766290b67_text.gif)