(09-11-2024, 11:31 AM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ] (09-11-2024, 10:05 AM)WingerDinger Wrote: [ -> ]She kinda said the same here..
https://www.businessinsider.com/kamala-h...ech-2022-1
I thought we'd be looking at something she said in the debate, but OK.
9/11 and J6 are both infamous days that will probably be discussed in American history classes for a few more generations at least. They are infamous for totally different reasons, but their level of infamy is similar.
So when do we start having moments of silence for The J6'ers then?
(09-11-2024, 11:49 AM)WingerDinger Wrote: [ -> ] (09-11-2024, 11:31 AM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ]I thought we'd be looking at something she said in the debate, but OK.
9/11 and J6 are both infamous days that will probably be discussed in American history classes for a few more generations at least. They are infamous for totally different reasons, but their level of infamy is similar.
So when do we start having moments of silence for The J6'ers then?
Can’t do that, they have to mention it to often to be able to be intentionally silent about it!
(09-11-2024, 11:49 AM)WingerDinger Wrote: [ -> ] (09-11-2024, 11:31 AM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ]I thought we'd be looking at something she said in the debate, but OK.
9/11 and J6 are both infamous days that will probably be discussed in American history classes for a few more generations at least. They are infamous for totally different reasons, but their level of infamy is similar.
So when do we start having moments of silence for The J6'ers then?
You can have one whenever you want.
I won't participate.
Just because it is an infamous incident doesn't mean there were a bunch of innocent victims who deserve to be remembered.
(09-11-2024, 12:39 PM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ] (09-11-2024, 11:49 AM)WingerDinger Wrote: [ -> ]So when do we start having moments of silence for The J6'ers then?
You can have one whenever you want.
I won't participate.
Just because it is an infamous incident doesn't mean there were a bunch of innocent victims who deserve to be remembered.
Only one innocent victim (Ashli Babbit) that day.
(09-11-2024, 12:43 PM)jagibelieve Wrote: [ -> ] (09-11-2024, 12:39 PM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ]You can have one whenever you want.
I won't participate.
Just because it is an infamous incident doesn't mean there were a bunch of innocent victims who deserve to be remembered.
Only one innocent victim (Ashli Babbit) that day.
Was Rosanne Boyland not innocent?
Anyhow, have as many moments of silence as you want, about whomever you want!
(09-11-2024, 04:02 PM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote: [ -> ]Even Biden os MAGA
https://twitter.com/LauraLoomer/status/1...foLsA&s=19
I can't believe this is true and not some AI video. I know it is real unless someone faked a ton of videos and still images. I just can't believe someone who hates Trump is that far gone and the people around him will not remove him. This is elder abuse and whoever has power of attorney should be stepping in to get him somewhere safe.
Sent from my SM-T970 using Tapatalk
(09-11-2024, 05:32 PM)p_rushing Wrote: [ -> ] (09-11-2024, 04:02 PM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote: [ -> ]Even Biden os MAGA
https://twitter.com/LauraLoomer/status/1...foLsA&s=19
I can't believe this is true and not some AI video. I know it is real unless someone faked a ton of videos and still images. I just can't believe someone who hates Trump is that far gone and the people around him will not remove him. This is elder abuse and whoever has power of attorney should be stepping in to get him somewhere safe.
Sent from my SM-T970 using Tapatalk
You lose your soul when you become a politician and nobody around you loves you any longer. He has nobody who cares enough about him to do what needs to be done.
I still believe they will find a way to remove him in order to claim Harris as the first female POTUS as one last feeble attempt to inject excitement into her campaign.
(09-11-2024, 09:57 AM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ] (09-11-2024, 09:08 AM)flsprtsgod Wrote: [ -> ]None of those three were "selling Harris" you dip [BLEEP]. And don't be revisionist now, we know you meant #OMB in post #5.
The problem with our extremist friends is not that they're ignorant, it's that they know so many things that just aren't so.
Lol, you soil Reagan with the stench of your failure.
(09-11-2024, 05:32 PM)p_rushing Wrote: [ -> ] (09-11-2024, 04:02 PM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote: [ -> ]Even Biden os MAGA
https://twitter.com/LauraLoomer/status/1...foLsA&s=19
I can't believe this is true and not some AI video. I know it is real unless someone faked a ton of videos and still images. I just can't believe someone who hates Trump is that far gone and the people around him will not remove him. This is elder abuse and whoever has power of attorney should be stepping in to get him somewhere safe.
Sent from my SM-T970 using Tapatalk
The deal had to be that he would step aside without putting up a fight, but would retain the office for the remainder of his term for pardon powers in the 11th hour. Try to forcefully remove him and Jill will sink Kamala.
(09-11-2024, 11:07 PM)Jaguarmeister Wrote: [ -> ] (09-11-2024, 05:32 PM)p_rushing Wrote: [ -> ]I can't believe this is true and not some AI video. I know it is real unless someone faked a ton of videos and still images. I just can't believe someone who hates Trump is that far gone and the people around him will not remove him. This is elder abuse and whoever has power of attorney should be stepping in to get him somewhere safe.
Sent from my SM-T970 using Tapatalk
The deal had to be that he would step aside without putting up a fight, but would retain the office for the remainder of his term for pardon powers in the 11th hour. Try to forcefully remove him and Jill will sink Kamala.
The same internal polling that forced them to put out the bat signal for the Taylor Swift endorsement a week before early voting begins will make them do anything, including ousting Biden in the next month. It's theor October surprise.
(09-11-2024, 10:33 PM)flsprtsgod Wrote: [ -> ] (09-11-2024, 09:57 AM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ]The problem with our extremist friends is not that they're ignorant, it's that they know so many things that just aren't so.
Lol, you soil Reagan with the stench of your failure.
We already know Bush 41 and Dick Cheney aren't (weren't) on board with Trump. I don't think Reagan would be either.
(09-12-2024, 08:39 AM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ] (09-11-2024, 10:33 PM)flsprtsgod Wrote: [ -> ]Lol, you soil Reagan with the stench of your failure.
We already know Bush 41 and Dick Cheney aren't (weren't) on board with Trump. I don't think Reagan would be either.
A former democrat who was an actor…are you sure about that?
(09-12-2024, 08:42 AM)Bchbunnie4 Wrote: [ -> ] (09-12-2024, 08:39 AM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ]We already know Bush 41 and Dick Cheney aren't (weren't) on board with Trump. I don't think Reagan would be either.
A former democrat who was an actor…are you sure about that?
He would be torn. His three most consistent beliefs were (1) cutting top marginal tax rates, (2) stopping socialized medicine, and (3) confronting Russia by all necessary means including proxy wars and nuclear buildup.
He might decide that the top marginal rates are low enough already, because today's rate is roughly half what it was when he first entered office. He might decide that Obamacare is here to stay and fighting it is a lost cause. He also might decide that Russia is no longer a communist state and we don't have to worry about them anymore. Anyhow, given that Cheney is with Kamala now and Bush 41 was for Hillary, I think Reagan would be with Kamala too.
Trump is to the left of Reagan, but those examples you chose make me laugh.
(09-12-2024, 10:58 AM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ] (09-12-2024, 10:39 AM)Lucky2Last Wrote: [ -> ]Trump is to the left of Reagan, but those examples you chose make me laugh.
Choose better ones then.
Oooo, chihuahua thinks he's a Doberman.
(09-12-2024, 11:07 AM)flsprtsgod Wrote: [ -> ] (09-12-2024, 10:58 AM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ]Choose better ones then.
Oooo, chihuahua thinks he's a Doberman.
Prove it.
I'm the only one here explaining my opinion.
Explain yours.
(09-12-2024, 09:44 AM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ] (09-12-2024, 08:42 AM)Bchbunnie4 Wrote: [ -> ]A former democrat who was an actor…are you sure about that?
He would be torn. His three most consistent beliefs were (1) cutting top marginal tax rates, (2) stopping socialized medicine, and (3) confronting Russia by all necessary means including proxy wars and nuclear buildup.
He might decide that the top marginal rates are low enough already, because today's rate is roughly half what it was when he first entered office. He might decide that Obamacare is here to stay and fighting it is a lost cause. He also might decide that Russia is no longer a communist state and we don't have to worry about them anymore. Anyhow, given that Cheney is with Kamala now and Bush 41 was for Hillary, I think Reagan would be with Kamala too.
I think there's a very good chance of that. Beyond policy differences, I think Ronald Reagan would have detested Donald Trump personally. Reagan got along with everyone, and was a good-natured person. I won't go over Trump's personality problems and peculiarities again, but personality-wise, he's about as far from Ronald Reagan as he could be.