10-21-2013, 09:09 PM
Quote:Hahaha when in doubt... blame the refs! They're the reason we lose! They have it out for us!You must not have watched that San Diego game. This team got robbed multiple times.
Classic.
Quote:Hahaha when in doubt... blame the refs! They're the reason we lose! They have it out for us!You must not have watched that San Diego game. This team got robbed multiple times.
Classic.
Quote:You must not have watched that San Diego game. This team got robbed multiple times.They're not the reason we lost dude.
Quote:They're not the reason we lost dude.
Quote:Color coded for convenience:could i get the link to the article that said this? I'm not calling you out or anything i just have a genune desire to read it.
Change has been for the better. We didn't trade up in this last draft. We didn't reach on a Quarterback because it was a desperate need. Even Jim Irsay has said that Khan is doing things the RIGHT WAY
Quote: could i get the link to the article that said this? I'm not calling you out or anything i just have a genune desire to read it.
Quote:We were dead last in payroll last year. We're somewhere middle of the pack this season which is even more frustrating.Wrong.
Quote:I have a very big question for those of you that are ok with the jags losing.Either is fine with me; it's all about acquiring talent.
What if Caldwell has a difference of opinion and believes another position aside from QB is the better pick 1st overall.
This team has really big needs at DE
Would it still be okay to lose if Caldwell does not take a QB with the 1st overall pick?
Another Scenario: If a team offers a bargin and Caldwell trades the 1st overall pick for a load of picks.
Is it still acceptable?
Quote:So sacrifice the future for four wins.
And YOU called other people idiots?
Quote:That game was lost before it even started. You give up that many yards to Ryan Matthews you have major problems on the DLine.
Quote:Another Scenario: If a team offers a bargin and Caldwell trades the 1st overall pick for a load of picks.
Is it still acceptable?
Quote:There is no objective way to determine worst team in NFL history.There may not be an objective way, but at the rate we are going we will be number 1 on everyone's subjective list.
The NFL doesn't name that team, and there's no way for the teams to play each other to make that determination.
At best you can compare numbers, but that would only get you so far. You can't name the teams in the past that successfully rebuilt by becoming the worst team in NFL history.
However, you CAN name several teams who successfully rebuilt after losing to the point where they had the top pick in the draft.
Quote:Not sacrificing the future for meaningless wins today = TANKING.You obviously have a different idea of 'tanking'.
Quote:You obviously have a different idea of 'tanking'.
Quote:If you'd rather win 4 games than 0 games, then you're not for tanking. If you'd rather win 0 games than 4 games to get a better pick, then you are tanking. I didn't think it's that difficult. Apparently, for you it is.You need to understand what 'tanking' is first. Then again, that's probably difficult for you.
Quote:I say we take Clowney in the draft and we could probably get Jay Cutler for cheap in the off-season.
Quote:Colts missed the memo?
Quote:If you refuse to ignore it, that's a you problem. Get some thicker skin and deal with it. One more time, this is a football team.
Quote:You need to understand what 'tanking' is first. Then again, that's probably difficult for you.