Jacksonville Jaguars Fan Forums

(01-03-2020, 10:27 AM)flsprtsgod Wrote: [ -> ]And now, with the topic turned completely to MIkesez and his all important worldview, the attention whoring is complete.

+1

(01-03-2020, 10:27 AM)flsprtsgod Wrote: [ -> ]And now, with the topic turned completely to MIkesez and his all important worldview, the attention whoring is complete.

I always say if you don't want to read what I say, don't.

Nothing is going on with impeachment the last couple of weeks.  The Senate is in session this week so hopefully there will be some on-topic things to discuss.

(01-03-2020, 11:26 AM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ]

(01-03-2020, 10:27 AM)flsprtsgod Wrote: [ -> ]And now, with the topic turned completely to MIkesez and his all important worldview, the attention whoring is complete.

I always say if you don't want to read what I say, don't.

Nothing is going on with impeachment the last couple of weeks.  The Senate is in session this week so hopefully there will be some on-topic things to discuss.

Senate being in session is moot.  Tell your beloved matriarch to take her medicine.

(01-04-2020, 03:46 AM)jj82284 Wrote: [ -> ]

(01-03-2020, 11:26 AM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ]I always say if you don't want to read what I say, don't.

Nothing is going on with impeachment the last couple of weeks.  The Senate is in session this week so hopefully there will be some on-topic things to discuss.

Senate being in session is moot.  Tell your beloved matriarch to take her medicine.

Stop making this thread about me.

(01-04-2020, 11:50 AM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ]

(01-04-2020, 03:46 AM)jj82284 Wrote: [ -> ]Senate being in session is moot.  Tell your beloved matriarch to take her medicine.

Stop making this thread about me.

Bwwwwaaaahahahahaaaaaaa

I guess Pelosi runs the Senate now. Who knew?

(01-04-2020, 01:42 PM)MalabarJag Wrote: [ -> ]

+1

I rise in nomination of this meme for the mob HOF.

John Bolton says he will testify if subpoenaed by the Senate.
Seems to be saying he wants the Senate to subpoena him.
He also said the House did its job, and we know Senator McConnell has been insisting that the House did not do its "homework".
Your thoughts?

(01-06-2020, 02:47 PM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ]John Bolton says he will testify if subpoenaed by the Senate.
Seems to be saying he wants the Senate to subpoena him.
He also said the House did its job, and we know Senator McConnell has been insisting that the House did not do its "homework".
Your thoughts?

This should be dismissed

(01-06-2020, 09:02 PM)jj82284 Wrote: [ -> ]

(01-06-2020, 02:47 PM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ]John Bolton says he will testify if subpoenaed by the Senate.
Seems to be saying he wants the Senate to subpoena him.
He also said the House did its job, and we know Senator McConnell has been insisting that the House did not do its "homework".
Your thoughts?

This should be dismissed

Who should dismiss it?

(01-06-2020, 09:23 PM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ]

(01-06-2020, 09:02 PM)jj82284 Wrote: [ -> ]This should be dismissed

Who should dismiss it?

The senate should dismiss the whole thing

https://www.cnn.com/2020/01/03/opinions/...index.html
https://www.justsecurity.org/67863/exclu...-concerns/

A judge recently ruled in favor of FOIA requests from the private Center for Public Integrity, and the public can no see more e-mails pertaining to the Ukraine scandal than even the House Intelligence committee was able to get during their earlier hearings.
These e-mails show:
*Hold on Ukraine funds came from POTUS
*Hold was placed immediately after July 25 2019 phone call
*NSA officials told OMB that OMB was breaking the law (the Impoundment Control Act) unless one of them gave an explanation to Congress. Neither did. Note - the hold was illegal, even if it wasn't part of a bribery/partisan influencing scheme.

(01-07-2020, 02:36 PM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ]https://www.cnn.com/2020/01/03/opinions/...index.html
https://www.justsecurity.org/67863/exclu...-concerns/

A judge recently ruled in favor of FOIA requests from the private Center for Public Integrity, and the public can no see more e-mails pertaining to the Ukraine scandal than even the House Intelligence committee was able to get during their earlier hearings.
These e-mails show:
*Hold on Ukraine funds came from POTUS
*Hold was placed immediately after July 25 2019 phone call
*NSA officials told OMB that OMB was breaking the law (the Impoundment Control Act) unless one of them gave an explanation to Congress.  Neither did.  Note - the hold was illegal, even if it wasn't part of a bribery/partisan influencing scheme.

So is there going to be impeachment V2.0?

Face it.  Your girl Pelosi was forced by the far left of your party to move with the impeachment process because it was "an emergency" and "extremely urgent", yet she sits on the weak partisan articles that they came up with.  The vote in the house was such a "solemn" and "regretful"  occasion that your girl had to wear funeral black and hush the far left in your party from cheering as the vote count was announced.

The bottom line is this whole "impeachment" process has been nothing more than a political move rather than a legal move.  I think most reasonable people can see that.

(01-07-2020, 04:50 PM)jagibelieve Wrote: [ -> ]

(01-07-2020, 02:36 PM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ]https://www.cnn.com/2020/01/03/opinions/...index.html
https://www.justsecurity.org/67863/exclu...-concerns/

A judge recently ruled in favor of FOIA requests from the private Center for Public Integrity, and the public can no see more e-mails pertaining to the Ukraine scandal than even the House Intelligence committee was able to get during their earlier hearings.
These e-mails show:
*Hold on Ukraine funds came from POTUS
*Hold was placed immediately after July 25 2019 phone call
*NSA officials told OMB that OMB was breaking the law (the Impoundment Control Act) unless one of them gave an explanation to Congress.  Neither did.  Note - the hold was illegal, even if it wasn't part of a bribery/partisan influencing scheme.

So is there going to be impeachment V2.0?

Face it.  Your girl Pelosi was forced by the far left of your party to move with the impeachment process because it was "an emergency" and "extremely urgent", yet she sits on the weak partisan articles that they came up with.  The vote in the house was such a "solemn" and "regretful"  occasion that your girl had to wear funeral black and hush the far left in your party from cheering as the vote count was announced.

The bottom line is this whole "impeachment" process has been nothing more than a political move rather than a legal move.  I think most reasonable people can see that.

1) Pelosi is not my girl. I disagree with her about many topics but not this one. Let's try to stay on this topic. Pelosi may have been pressured into the making some decisions for dumb reasons, nonetheless a person can make the right decision for the wrong reasons.

2) impeachment is always a political process. If it were meant to be a legal process, they would have used judges and juries.

3) Yes, the House can pass different versions of impeachment articles as many times as they see fit.  The vice president and the members of the cabinet are also subject to impeachment ad infinitum. I see that some Republican senators are foolishly saying that they only have to respond to what is in the articles. Nancy can pass more articles.

(01-07-2020, 02:36 PM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ]https://www.cnn.com/2020/01/03/opinions/...index.html
https://www.justsecurity.org/67863/exclu...-concerns/

A judge recently ruled in favor of FOIA requests from the private Center for Public Integrity, and the public can no see more e-mails pertaining to the Ukraine scandal than even the House Intelligence committee was able to get during their earlier hearings.
These e-mails show:
*Hold on Ukraine funds came from POTUS
*Hold was placed immediately after July 25 2019 phone call
*NSA officials told OMB that OMB was breaking the law (the Impoundment Control Act) unless one of them gave an explanation to Congress.  Neither did.  Note - the hold was illegal, even if it wasn't part of a bribery/partisan influencing scheme.

Shaking my head.  

Under the impoundment control act there is a TIME LIMIT.  the aid was released BEFORE THE DEADLINE.  

did anyone find an email where the hold was DISCLOSED TO THE UKRAINIANS?  it wasnt on the july 25 call.  

Did they find an email with our 7 billion dollars? 

Did they find the transcript of joe bidens meeting with Devon archer?

I can’t wait for the crying and [BLEEP] the left will have for the 4 more years. Hell, it’ll probably buy the right another 4-8 after that. You know the shirts that say “ these colors don’t run”? Maybe the left can come out with “these tears do run”. [BLEEP] crybabies.

Apparently it was quite the show that Pelosi put on for the impeachment signing. Even CNN couldn’t ignore it.

Today, the Government Accountability Office released their decision that the OMB violated the Impoundment Control Act.

So they agree with the NSA officials we discussed earlier.

Now follow along as JJ tells us that Trump and his appointees are allowed to violate the law.

(01-16-2020, 11:53 AM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ]Today, the Government Accountability Office released their decision that the OMB violated the Impoundment Control Act.

So they agree with the NSA officials we discussed earlier.

Now follow along as JJ tells us that Trump and his appointees are allowed to violate the law.

So they released their "OPINION" a day after Congress delivered the articles of impeachment to the Senate after a month delay?

We got him this time!

There is no deep state.