(08-30-2020, 11:00 AM)Lucky2Last Wrote: [ -> ]Wearing a hat. Not chasing anyone. Not assaulting anyone. Anybody on this board going to rationalize why a man should be shot for wearing a hat? This is all brought about by leftist ideology. Words are violence, right?
I can't make out what is being shouted before the gunshots. I've seen no context to the incident yet, although it probably doesn't justify the killing.
(08-30-2020, 11:00 AM)Lucky2Last Wrote: [ -> ]Wearing a hat. Not chasing anyone. Not assaulting anyone. Anybody on this board going to rationalize why a man should be shot for wearing a hat? This is all brought about by leftist ideology. Words are violence, right?
It doesn't make sense.. feels like the start of some action or mystery movie. I hope they catch the [BLEEP] who pulled the trigger.
(08-30-2020, 11:29 AM)homebiscuit Wrote: [ -> ] (08-30-2020, 11:00 AM)Lucky2Last Wrote: [ -> ]Wearing a hat. Not chasing anyone. Not assaulting anyone. Anybody on this board going to rationalize why a man should be shot for wearing a hat? This is all brought about by leftist ideology. Words are violence, right?
I can't make out what is being shouted before the gunshots. I've seen no context to the incident yet, although it probably doesn't justify the killing.
https://twitter.com/stillgray/status/129...26080?s=19
(08-30-2020, 12:53 PM)Senor Fantastico Wrote: [ -> ] (08-30-2020, 11:29 AM)homebiscuit Wrote: [ -> ]I can't make out what is being shouted before the gunshots. I've seen no context to the incident yet, although it probably doesn't justify the killing.
https://twitter.com/stillgray/status/129...26080?s=19
I see a political ad coming.
The left will condemn a 17 year old as a white supremacist who was defending himself...
but when a man wearing a hat is murdered for no reason except for what he was wearing? Crickets. The left on this board are just as evil as the left at large.
(08-31-2020, 08:04 AM)TrivialPursuit Wrote: [ -> ]The left will condemn a 17 year old as a white supremacist who was defending himself...
but when a man wearing a hat is murdered for no reason except for what he was wearing? Crickets. The left on this board are just as evil as the left at large.
It's not evil. They are simply employing the tactics they were taught in their years of attendance at the tax payer funded liberal indoctrination system that is our public schools.
(08-31-2020, 08:04 AM)TrivialPursuit Wrote: [ -> ]The left will condemn a 17 year old as a white supremacist who was defending himself...
but when a man wearing a hat is murdered for no reason except for what he was wearing? Crickets. The left on this board are just as evil as the left at large.
I don't know if he was a white supremacist, but, per Wisconsin law, he was obligated to retreat and to use the least lethal means available to him if he wants to claim self-defense. Should have used the butt end of his rifle if he didn't want to be on trial for murder.
(08-31-2020, 08:51 AM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ] (08-31-2020, 08:04 AM)TrivialPursuit Wrote: [ -> ]The left will condemn a 17 year old as a white supremacist who was defending himself...
but when a man wearing a hat is murdered for no reason except for what he was wearing? Crickets. The left on this board are just as evil as the left at large.
I don't know if he was a white supremacist, but, per Wisconsin law, he was obligated to retreat and to use the least lethal means available to him if he wants to claim self-defense. Should have used the butt end of his rifle if he didn't want to be on trial for murder.
You watch too many movies.
And he talks about the 17 year old instead of the murder of a man wearing a hat.
That's evil.
(08-31-2020, 09:09 AM)homebiscuit Wrote: [ -> ] (08-31-2020, 08:51 AM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ]I don't know if he was a white supremacist, but, per Wisconsin law, he was obligated to retreat and to use the least lethal means available to him if he wants to claim self-defense. Should have used the butt end of his rifle if he didn't want to be on trial for murder.
You watch too many movies.
No, I read too many state statutes. The kid was disobeying a lawful order to stay inside for a curfew, and he was too young to legally carry a rifle. those two facts reduce the level of self-defense that Wisconsin law permits him to exercise.
(08-31-2020, 09:17 AM)TrivialPursuit Wrote: [ -> ]And he talks about the 17 year old instead of the murder of a man wearing a hat.
That's evil.
I already commented on the poor guy in the hat. If they figure out who pulled the trigger, I hope they get the death penalty - unless there's some mitigating circumstance we don't know about at the moment.
(08-31-2020, 09:23 AM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ] (08-31-2020, 09:09 AM)homebiscuit Wrote: [ -> ]You watch too many movies.
No, I read too many state statutes. The kid was disobeying a lawful order to stay inside for a curfew, and he was too young to legally carry a rifle. those two facts reduce the level of self-defense that Wisconsin law permits him to exercise.
Okay.
(08-31-2020, 09:36 AM)homebiscuit Wrote: [ -> ] (08-31-2020, 09:23 AM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ]No, I read too many state statutes. The kid was disobeying a lawful order to stay inside for a curfew, and he was too young to legally carry a rifle. those two facts reduce the level of self-defense that Wisconsin law permits him to exercise.
Okay.
Wiki-lawyer is best lawyer.
(08-31-2020, 08:51 AM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ] (08-31-2020, 08:04 AM)TrivialPursuit Wrote: [ -> ]The left will condemn a 17 year old as a white supremacist who was defending himself...
but when a man wearing a hat is murdered for no reason except for what he was wearing? Crickets. The left on this board are just as evil as the left at large.
I don't know if he was a white supremacist, but, per Wisconsin law, he was obligated to retreat and to use the least lethal means available to him if he wants to claim self-defense. Should have used the butt end of his rifle if he didn't want to be on trial for murder.
He was running away. They tackled him and were beating him with fists and a skateboard with a third guy pulling a gun. Only a moron would suggest a rifle butt in that situation, so I guess you fulfilled expectations.
(08-31-2020, 09:45 AM)flsprtsgod Wrote: [ -> ] (08-31-2020, 09:36 AM)homebiscuit Wrote: [ -> ]Okay.
Wiki-lawyer is best lawyer.
(08-31-2020, 08:51 AM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ]I don't know if he was a white supremacist, but, per Wisconsin law, he was obligated to retreat and to use the least lethal means available to him if he wants to claim self-defense. Should have used the butt end of his rifle if he didn't want to be on trial for murder.
He was running away. They tackled him and were beating him with fists and a skateboard with a third guy pulling a gun. Only a moron would suggest a rifle butt in that situation, so I guess you fulfilled expectations.
That's what I was alluding to but he intentionally ignored it.
(08-31-2020, 09:23 AM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ] (08-31-2020, 09:09 AM)homebiscuit Wrote: [ -> ]You watch too many movies.
No, I read too many state statutes. The kid was disobeying a lawful order to stay inside for a curfew, and he was too young to legally carry a rifle. those two facts reduce the level of self-defense that Wisconsin law permits him to exercise.
(08-31-2020, 09:17 AM)TrivialPursuit Wrote: [ -> ]And he talks about the 17 year old instead of the murder of a man wearing a hat.
That's evil.
I already commented on the poor guy in the hat. If they figure out who pulled the trigger, I hope they get the death penalty - unless there's some mitigating circumstance we don't know about at the moment.
As usual you are wrong again.
(08-31-2020, 10:55 AM)jagibelieve Wrote: [ -> ] (08-31-2020, 09:23 AM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ]No, I read too many state statutes. The kid was disobeying a lawful order to stay inside for a curfew, and he was too young to legally carry a rifle. those two facts reduce the level of self-defense that Wisconsin law permits him to exercise.
As usual you are wrong again.
Quote the statute. Show me where I got it wrong.
Ahh, the peaceful, level headed anqueefa at it again. Pure scum.
(08-31-2020, 09:45 AM)flsprtsgod Wrote: [ -> ]
(08-31-2020, 08:51 AM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ]I don't know if he was a white supremacist, but, per Wisconsin law, he was obligated to retreat and to use the least lethal means available to him if he wants to claim self-defense. Should have used the butt end of his rifle if he didn't want to be on trial for murder.
He was running away. They tackled him and were beating him with fists and a skateboard with a third guy pulling a gun. Only a moron would suggest a rifle butt in that situation, so I guess you fulfilled expectations.
I'm not suggesting it as a good tactical choice.
The kid made enough poor choices leading up to that that he had no good tactical choices left.
I am saying it was the only choice that would allow him to make a self defense claim in Wisconsin court.
(08-31-2020, 11:24 AM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ] (08-31-2020, 09:45 AM)flsprtsgod Wrote: [ -> ]
He was running away. They tackled him and were beating him with fists and a skateboard with a third guy pulling a gun. Only a moron would suggest a rifle butt in that situation, so I guess you fulfilled expectations.
I'm not suggesting it as a good tactical choice.
The kid made enough poor choices leading up to that that he had no good tactical choices left.
I am saying it was the only choice that would allow him to make a self defense claim in Wisconsin court.
Lol, suurreeee. Meanwhile his actual attorneys have already done so.
(08-31-2020, 11:54 AM)flsprtsgod Wrote: [ -> ] (08-31-2020, 11:24 AM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ]I'm not suggesting it as a good tactical choice.
The kid made enough poor choices leading up to that that he had no good tactical choices left.
I am saying it was the only choice that would allow him to make a self defense claim in Wisconsin court.
Lol, suurreeee. Meanwhile his actual attorneys have already done so.
And the prosecution agrees with what I'm saying.
We will have to see what the judge says.
Is mikesez JaguarsWoman? There cannot be any other explanation