I've been going to Patriots games since 1965 when they played at Nickerson field, Harvard, and Fenway Park, and were the Boston Patriots.
Strength of schedule? The Patriots didn't have a difficult schedule. I don't get that argument here.
Two of the better teams they did play (KC and CAR) they lost to.
This isn't the 2007 Patriots. This team is definitely beatable and the Jaguars 100% have the potential to beat them this week.
I heard around that Tonya Harding can hook us up with 'a guy' who can arrange things.
(01-16-2018, 05:06 PM)BostonBlackie Wrote: [ -> ]I got news for both the Pats fans in here, and the Jag fans, the game is on Sunday, all this back and forth about who is going to do what to whom, or who did what to whom, is BS.
So then let's shut the forums down.
In fact, let's close every sports bar, pool hall, office water cooler, and sports talk radio show until after the game.
That'll solve that problem.
(01-16-2018, 05:19 PM)BostonBlackie Wrote: [ -> ] (01-16-2018, 05:18 PM)Scarecrow Wrote: [ -> ]Strength of schedule? The Patriots didn't have a difficult schedule. I don't get that argument here.
Two of the better teams they did play (KC and CAR) they lost to.
This isn't the 2007 Patriots. This team is definitely beatable and the Jaguars 100% have the potential to beat them this week.
Isn't that all obvious?
Not by some of what I'm reading, no.
(01-16-2018, 05:21 PM)Bullseye Wrote: [ -> ] (01-16-2018, 05:06 PM)BostonBlackie Wrote: [ -> ]I got news for both the Pats fans in here, and the Jag fans, the game is on Sunday, all this back and forth about who is going to do what to whom, or who did what to whom, is BS.
So then let's shut the forums down.
In fact, let's close every sports bar, pool hall, office water cooler, and sports talk radio show until after the game.
That'll solve that problem.
No need for that son.
(01-16-2018, 05:23 PM)Scarecrow Wrote: [ -> ] (01-16-2018, 05:19 PM)BostonBlackie Wrote: [ -> ]Isn't that all obvious?
Not by some of what I'm reading, no.
Read selectively. This is the Patriots toughest game since last years SB.
(01-16-2018, 05:25 PM)BostonBlackie Wrote: [ -> ] (01-16-2018, 05:21 PM)Bullseye Wrote: [ -> ]So then let's shut the forums down.
In fact, let's close every sports bar, pool hall, office water cooler, and sports talk radio show until after the game.
That'll solve that problem.
No need for that son.
Your post was somehow essential?
(01-16-2018, 05:07 PM)Patriot71 Wrote: [ -> ]1971 for me.
LOL this was this season. I couldn't even find the last time they soldout?
Jaguars hit attendance low under Khan’s ownership
Posted by Mike Florio on October 16, 2017, 11:22 AM EST
Getty Images
At 3-2 before Sunday, the Jaguars entered their second true home game of the season with a winning record and a signature victory over the Steelers. Jacksonville’s home team also was alone in first place in the AFC South.
Given that the team has managed to sell plenty of tickets through plenty of struggles, they filled up EverBank Field for the game against the Rams, right?
That didn’t happen. In fact, it was the lowest showing at home since Shad Khan purchased the team. According to Phillip Hellman of the Florida Times-Union, only 56,232 showed up for the 27-17 loss.
The low turnout could be a product of disinterest, but the team is actually interesting this year — even though inconsistent. The win-one-lose-one formula suggested that a loss was looming in Week Six. Still, many expected the Jags to win the game, which would have moved them to 4-2 through six weeks of the season.
Who the hell cares? What does that have to do with the game?
(01-16-2018, 05:18 PM)Scarecrow Wrote: [ -> ]Strength of schedule? The Patriots didn't have a difficult schedule. I don't get that argument here.
Two of the better teams they did play (KC and CAR) they lost to.
This isn't the 2007 Patriots. This team is definitely beatable and the Jaguars 100% have the potential to beat them this week.
Jax's was 30th in the league in terms of strength.
There are 32 teams in the league.
At one point, NE had this:
@ Denver
vs Oakland but in Mexico City
@ Miami
@ Pitt
Show us a similar challenging stretch for Jax:
(01-16-2018, 05:32 PM)TyLawsPick6 Wrote: [ -> ] (01-16-2018, 05:18 PM)Scarecrow Wrote: [ -> ]Strength of schedule? The Patriots didn't have a difficult schedule. I don't get that argument here.
Two of the better teams they did play (KC and CAR) they lost to.
This isn't the 2007 Patriots. This team is definitely beatable and the Jaguars 100% have the potential to beat them this week.
Jax's was 30th in the league in terms of strength.
There are 32 teams in the league.
At one point, NE had this:
@ Denver
vs Oakland but in Mexico City
@ Miami
@ Pitt
Show us a similar challenging stretch for Jax:
They're in the AFCCG, and they're for real, who cares how they got there?
(01-16-2018, 04:48 PM)Mandeezee Wrote: [ -> ]The Jags should stay in Nickel and Dime as the Pats don't have a dominant running game. Lewis and whoever does a pretty good job, but they're not big, bruising backs. They're the little, scat, shifty, type. Thus the Jags don't need to run the 4-3 or 4-6 much if any.
They can go with Jalen on Gronk and Bouye on Cook. Or run single high safety with Gipson, while Telvin shades Gronk underneath with Church over the top, Jack is man up with whatever back is in.
Jags on O should try pounding the ball. If NE is selling out to stop it, send the TE's over the middle and on out breaking routes. I would also use Blake on the Roll Out. If the Pats are determined or rather playing to stop the run and roll out, that leaves other areas of weakness which the Jag coaches need to take advantage of.
Marrone is looking to be a very cerebral coach. The offensive game plan he had for the Steelers shows this. That playaction up the middle to Bohanan backs this up.
Whoever is on Cook needs to maul him at the line! In the past, that's how you dealt with NE and their passing game. Coupled with hitting Brady in his mouth
Brady and the Pats are so good because of their SYSTEM. Brady and Bill have a connection which has flourished over the years because they have a great connection. Brady is able to give Bill what he wants on the field. Again, they have a SYSTEM and to fight a system you have to disrupt it. There's a reason many WR's couldn't cut it on the Pats. Brady demands his WR's to be where they're supposed to be on time...so he can almost make the throws blind-folded. Brady is good...but any QB who put the work in would be able to duplicate what Brady done in this SYSTEM.
You clearly know nothing by saying "Pats don't have a dominant run game"...That's because the Pats play a different way almost every week. Are you new to this?
Dion Lewis and Rex Burkhead will shred your D if you believe that.
(01-16-2018, 05:06 PM)BostonBlackie Wrote: [ -> ]I got news for both the Pats fans in here, and the Jag fans, the game is on Sunday, all this back and forth about who is going to do what to whom, or who did what to whom back when, is [BLEEP].
Says the guy who is registered in opposing fans' forum, signed on, and engaging in dialogue, actively. Genuinely disappointed with the basic reasoning of some of you MA lads.
You know your argument went boobs up when you have to start throwing around attendance records as comebacks.
.gif "Laughing")
(01-16-2018, 05:34 PM)TyLawsPick6 Wrote: [ -> ]You clearly know nothing by saying "Pats don't have a dominant run game"...That's because the Pats play a different way almost every week. Are you new to this?
Dion Lewis and Rex Burkhead will shred your D if you believe that.
The Pats DO NOT have a dominant run game
He didn't say you weren't good, or effective, or even problematic. Which your run game can be
You can't be the best at everything
(01-16-2018, 05:32 PM)TyLawsPick6 Wrote: [ -> ] (01-16-2018, 05:18 PM)Scarecrow Wrote: [ -> ]Strength of schedule? The Patriots didn't have a difficult schedule. I don't get that argument here.
Two of the better teams they did play (KC and CAR) they lost to.
This isn't the 2007 Patriots. This team is definitely beatable and the Jaguars 100% have the potential to beat them this week.
Jax's was 30th in the league in terms of strength.
There are 32 teams in the league.
At one point, NE had this:
@ Denver
vs Oakland but in Mexico City
@ Miami
@ Pitt
Show us a similar challenging stretch for Jax:
Denver? 5-11 Denver?
Oakland? In Mexico City okay...but Oakland was a train wreck this season. 6-10.
@Miami? Other than the fact that Brady doesn't have a good record there what's tough about playing in southern Florida? They were also 6-10.
@Pitt I get. But the Jaguars traveled there too and beat them worse than you did.
Those games weren't consecutive either...how is that a "stretch" of games? They played Denver then Oakland coming off of their bye week.
I am not saying the Jaguars had a difficult schedule but the two schedules are both weak this year. Neither played a difficult schedule by this years standards.
(01-16-2018, 05:34 PM)BritJag Wrote: [ -> ]Says the guy who is registered in opposing fans' forum, signed on, and engaging in dialogue, actively. Genuinely disappointed with the basic reasoning of some of you MA lads.
Says the guy who's made no predictions, and only claimed that this will be a very tough game.
(01-16-2018, 05:30 PM)BostonBlackie Wrote: [ -> ] (01-16-2018, 05:27 PM)Bullseye Wrote: [ -> ]Your post was somehow essential?
It never hurts to come back down to earth. The [BLEEP] gets old.
As far as I'm concerned, the back and forth is fun.
Not too many people from other teams have bothered to visit this board and its predecessor over the years. What's the point in trolling a team so far down? Heck, you guys have been so insanely successful for so long, of course all of this stuff is old hat to you.
I like the change.
I happen to like debating football with fans of other teams, because I like seeing the different perspectives and learning other things.
But let's get real here.
You came to
this board and posted.
All of the years of pats success...all of the years of the internet...you had to know that...*gasp* Jaguars fans would have opinions, too.
The Jaguars being 30th in SOS is true and I'm not disputing that. The Jaguars were 30th in SOS and the same site I see that lists the Pats at 29.
(01-16-2018, 05:35 PM)Bchbunnie4 Wrote: [ -> ]You know your argument went boobs up when you have to start throwing around attendance records as comebacks.
That's quite the visual there, Bch.
In fact...I'm gonna see if I can find any pics to encapsulate that visual.
