Jacksonville Jaguars Fan Forums

Full Version: Elon Musk now owns Twitter
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Twitter has never been more interesting, that’s why I KNOW the Rats are gonna kill it…
(12-03-2022, 11:15 PM)americus 2.0 Wrote: [ -> ]He certainly lives rent free in their heads.

Who would have ever predicted Musk and Trump to become roommates.....
Elon Musk Will Not Sign Autographs ‘Ever Again’ As He Warns Assassination Risk Is ‘Quite Significant’

Twitter CEO Elon Musk told groveling paparazzi over the weekend night that he will “never again” sign autographs as he warned that the risk that someone will try to assassinate him is actually “quite significant.”

Musk told the paparazzi that he would no longer sign autographs after he landed in at Dulles International Airport Saturday night, TMZ reported.

https://www.dailywire.com/news/elon-musk...AYGY_S6fso

Twitter's Largest Advertiser Returns to Platform, Has Now 'Fully Resumed' Spending

Twitter owner Elon Musk said Saturday that Apple is resuming its ad spending on his social media platform.

In a Twitter Spaces conversation, Musk said Apple had “fully resumed” its advertising, according to Bloomberg.

Musk also noted that Apple is Twitter’s largest advertiser.

https://www.westernjournal.com/twitters-...FWjbVI8TgY
Apple had no choice but to resume advertising on Twitter. After Tim Cook was caught red handed abetting the CCCP’s suppression of Chinese protesters, Apple couldn’t be seen as being unsupportive of a free speech platform.
(12-04-2022, 08:44 AM)Sneakers Wrote: [ -> ]
(12-03-2022, 11:15 PM)americus 2.0 Wrote: [ -> ]He certainly lives rent free in their heads.

Who would have ever predicted Musk and Trump to become roommates.....

We live in strange times
It's funny. The left has made it that way. Musk disavowed Trump early in his term, just to end up in the same boat for wanting free speech.
Ex-Twitter counsel James Baker's wife registered voters for Hillary Clinton in 2016, posts reveal
Baker's wife, Darsia Cahall, also supported Democratic Rep. Jamie Raskin and failed Maryland gubernatorial candidate Tom Perez.

The wife of James Baker, Twitter's former deputy general counsel, who Elon Musk fired on Tuesday following his role in handling the Hunter Biden laptop story, helped register Hillary Clinton voters and was involved in other Democratic activism, posts reveal.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ex-twit...sts-reveal
Another Friday night Twitter Files drop…

https://twitter.com/mtaibbi?s=20&t=QkbLk...-rJtpDef_A
Bummer for the first amendment. Looks like twitter was meeting weekly with the FBI/DHS/DNI to determine which stories to suppress.
There was also something about a pedo file release but didn't see anything other than some live discussion. I was hoping they would be naming all the people who ignored it, maybe they did but didn't see it posted anywhere.

Sent from my SM-S901U using Tapatalk
Musk is a genius. He's going to have more people on Twitter now than ever before. He's cut 80% of the dead wood out of his company, he's got Friday night reveals going on, and moving forward, he can dominate the news cycles all the way to the next election if he wishes. And all that the guilty on the Left and Right can do is just deny and/or downplay, tho that's going to be tough if their actions are published for all to see. Zuckerberg and the Google twins have got to know that they are next to be scrutinized, if we can find any uncompromised government agency that could do so. I'm guessing there's a whole lotta 'deleting goin' on at Meta and Google right now. Somewhere in London, Julian Assange must be smiling.
(12-10-2022, 12:43 AM)Lucky2Last Wrote: [ -> ]Bummer for the first amendment. Looks like twitter was meeting weekly with the FBI/DHS/DNI to determine which stories to suppress.

Gosh why would those three Trump appointed officials do all this?
https://twitter.com/HansMahncke/status/1...ZTFaA&s=19

With so many government officials that had their slimy, pathetic hands on board at Twitter, I'm actually surprised that the deal went through for Musk to purchase it..

It's true, Musk purchased a crime scene..
[Image: 20221210-093111.jpg]

[Image: 20221210-093605.jpg]
(12-10-2022, 09:36 AM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ]
(12-10-2022, 12:43 AM)Lucky2Last Wrote: [ -> ]Bummer for the first amendment. Looks like twitter was meeting weekly with the FBI/DHS/DNI to determine which stories to suppress.

Gosh why would those three Trump appointed officials do all this?

Show of hands… Is anyone shocked in the least that this is your only comment on the new drop?
[Image: ?u=https%3A%2F%2Fmedia3.giphy.com%2Fmedi...ipo=images]

(12-10-2022, 09:36 AM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ]
(12-10-2022, 12:43 AM)Lucky2Last Wrote: [ -> ]Bummer for the first amendment. Looks like twitter was meeting weekly with the FBI/DHS/DNI to determine which stories to suppress.

Gosh why would those three Trump appointed officials do all this?

Uh... I don't know... maybe the deep state is corrupt? This is only difficult for you because you refuse to admit there's an apparatus working behind the curtain that is unelected and unaccountable. Doesn't really matter how many times you are blatantly lied to.
(12-10-2022, 11:44 AM)Lucky2Last Wrote: [ -> ]
(12-10-2022, 09:36 AM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ]Gosh why would those three Trump appointed officials do all this?

Uh... I don't know... maybe the deep state is corrupt? This is only difficult for you because you refuse to admit there's an apparatus working behind the curtain that is unelected and unaccountable. Doesn't really matter how many times you are blatantly lied to.

This is your problem: you have an ethical concept of "bad" and it boils down to "everything the elite does".  But you do not have an ethical concept of "good".  
You're probably thinking, no, of course I do.  Everyone does.  
OK prove it.  What "good" thing could FBI/DHS/DNI have done, other than "nothing"?
This is your problem: you have an ethical concept of heterosexuality, but you do not have a concept of homosexuality. Ok prove it. What could you do that you would enjoy homosexually, other than nothing.

I'm sure you can tell the above scenario is pretty slanted. Do you care to refine your question, or do I have to operate in that ridiculously narrow paradigm you presented to me? Nothing is the answer, dummy.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25