Jacksonville Jaguars Fan Forums

https://twitter.com/ShellenbergerMD/stat...sVgHg&s=19

Throw in a little money laundering? Maybe grease some more palms?

Trump should still be President, my opinion.

The FBI had the laptop for almost a full year before The New York Post ran the laptop story.. And for that year, they pushed misinformation about it..

Well, c'mon moderates. What are you being told about this?

(12-19-2022, 06:01 PM)Lucky2Last Wrote: [ -> ]Well, c'mon moderates. What are you being told about this?

Nothing, I'm sure. WaPo and NYT subscriptions don't come with all the facts. We also know the MSM won't touch it with a ten-foot pole. 

'Democracy Dies in All the News That's Fit to Print'

If Trump appointee Christopher Wray thought it was best to work with old Twitter this way, who am I to question it. More importantly, who are you?

LMAO

(12-19-2022, 01:57 PM)WingerDinger Wrote: [ -> ]https://twitter.com/ShellenbergerMD/stat...-tGAg&s=19

So the FBI was giving Top Secret Clearance to Twitter Employees..

If those employees/executives are the former FBI and CIA agents pointed out in another post then they're likely already cleared for top secret clearance due to the nature of their former jobs. There is no way the average Twitter employee was given that clearance. They wouldn't even know what they were supposed to look for.

(12-19-2022, 06:59 PM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ]If Trump appointee Christopher Wray thought it was best to work with old Twitter this way, who am I to question it.  More importantly,  who are you?

Lol. You and people like you are why we can't have nice things.

(12-20-2022, 12:58 AM)Lucky2Last Wrote: [ -> ]

(12-19-2022, 06:59 PM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ]If Trump appointee Christopher Wray thought it was best to work with old Twitter this way, who am I to question it.  More importantly,  who are you?

Lol. You and people like you are why we can't have nice things.

Really?  Lets see if thats true.  

Complete one or both of these sentences:
The FBI should never _______.
A private social media company should never ______.

Then, explain how violations of either principle should be punished.  

Then, explain how that punishment, if it had been levied in 2020, would have allowed us to have nice things.

You have an uncanny ability to miss the obvious. Literally nothing that you just typed in your last post matters.

Go back to your previous post and address the problems with it. Let me put it in logical format: Trump appointed Wray. Trump is a Republican. Therefore, Republicans cannot question the integrity of Wray.

That's your logic. On its face, that is an incredibly stupid position to take, lol. The jump you make from your premise to your conclusion is completely non-sensical. You are justifying literal disinformation by a branch of the FBI because Trump appointed the leader.

The FBI had Biden's laptop for a year. They had verified the contents. They knew it belonged to Hunter Biden. They actively worked with social media companies to suppress any information coming out about the laptop. They told them it was a national security issue to keep those stories suppressed. They lied to corporations and appointed special liaisons to prevent people from spreading true information about said laptop. That is textbook abuse of power.

Who cares who appointed the leader of that organization, Mikey? Why do you [BLEEP] care? That is not how any of that is supposed to work. Pull your head out of your [BLEEP] and stop defending the corruption of our institutions.

(12-20-2022, 10:21 AM)Lucky2Last Wrote: [ -> ]You have an uncanny ability to miss the obvious. Literally nothing that you just typed in your last post matters.

Go back to your previous post and address the problems with it. Let me put it in logical format: Trump appointed Wray. Trump is a Republican. Therefore, Republicans cannot question the integrity of Wray.

That's your logic. On its face, that is an incredibly stupid position to take, lol. The jump you make from your premise to your conclusion is completely non-sensical. You are justifying literal disinformation by a branch of the FBI because Trump appointed the leader.

The FBI had Biden's laptop for a year. They had verified the contents. They knew it belonged to Hunter Biden. They actively worked with social media companies to suppress any information coming out about the laptop. They told them it was a national security issue to keep those stories suppressed. They lied to corporations and appointed special liaisons to prevent people from spreading true information about said laptop. That is textbook abuse of power.

Who cares who appointed the leader of that organization, Mikey? Why do you [BLEEP] care? That is not how any of that is supposed to work. Pull your head out of your [BLEEP] and stop defending the corruption of our institutions.

I never said that.
 Anybody can question the integrity or honesty of anybody else.
 I'm asking you to explain exactly what wray did wrong, then explain by what process we could have gotten someone better.

A journalist on Brian Kilmeade who was in on a conference with Musk and has seen the documented proof of the collusion with the FBI to not only suppress conservative posters, but also an extensive misinformation campaign to derail the Hunter Biden laptop story. The journalist is an admitted liberal on many fronts but is shocked at not only a weaponized FBI, but the MSM’s refusal to cover this story. He says this will eventually all come out and will do even more harm to the already diminished trust in the media.

(12-20-2022, 12:59 PM)homebiscuit Wrote: [ -> ]A journalist on Brian Kilmeade who was in on a conference with Musk and has seen the documented proof of the collusion with the FBI to not only suppress conservative posters, but also an extensive misinformation campaign to derail the Hunter Biden laptop story. The journalist is an admitted liberal on many fronts but is shocked at not only a weaponized FBI, but the MSM’s refusal to cover this story. He says this will eventually all come out and will do even more harm to the already diminished trust in the media.

Bingo.. They can ignore it now, but not forever..

A reckoning is coming.

(12-19-2022, 06:59 PM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ]If Trump appointee Christopher Wray thought it was best to work with old Twitter this way, who am I to question it.  More importantly,  who are you?

(12-20-2022, 12:26 PM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ]

(12-20-2022, 10:21 AM)Lucky2Last Wrote: [ -> ]You have an uncanny ability to miss the obvious. Literally nothing that you just typed in your last post matters.

Go back to your previous post and address the problems with it. Let me put it in logical format: Trump appointed Wray. Trump is a Republican. Therefore, Republicans cannot question the integrity of Wray.

That's your logic. On its face, that is an incredibly stupid position to take, lol. The jump you make from your premise to your conclusion is completely non-sensical. You are justifying literal disinformation by a branch of the FBI because Trump appointed the leader.

The FBI had Biden's laptop for a year. They had verified the contents. They knew it belonged to Hunter Biden. They actively worked with social media companies to suppress any information coming out about the laptop. They told them it was a national security issue to keep those stories suppressed. They lied to corporations and appointed special liaisons to prevent people from spreading true information about said laptop. That is textbook abuse of power.

Who cares who appointed the leader of that organization, Mikey? Why do you [BLEEP] care? That is not how any of that is supposed to work. Pull your head out of your [BLEEP] and stop defending the corruption of our institutions.

I never said that.
 Anybody can question the integrity or honesty of anybody else.
 I'm asking you to explain exactly what wray did wrong, then explain by what process we could have gotten someone better.

You most certainly did.

(12-20-2022, 02:31 PM)Lucky2Last Wrote: [ -> ]

(12-19-2022, 06:59 PM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ]If Trump appointee Christopher Wray thought it was best to work with old Twitter this way, who am I to question it.  More importantly,  who are you?

(12-20-2022, 12:26 PM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ]I never said that.
 Anybody can question the integrity or honesty of anybody else.
 I'm asking you to explain exactly what wray did wrong, then explain by what process we could have gotten someone better.

You most certainly did.

"Who are you to question it" does not mean "no one can question it." It means "I would like you to establish some sort of framework or expertise before you question it."

No. That's stupid.

The first 30 minutes or so of the latest Advisory Opinions podcast dives into what we know so far about the Twitter Files. They say that these allegations are still a few slices short of a sandwich, and explain what the missing elements are.

Now The Pentagon is involved lololol
https://twitter.com/lhfang/status/160529...-cX9A&s=19