(12-10-2022, 02:43 PM)Lucky2Last Wrote: [ -> ]This is your problem: you have an ethical concept of heterosexuality, but you do not have a concept of homosexuality. Ok prove it. What could you do that you would enjoy homosexually, other than nothing.
I'm sure you can tell the above scenario is pretty slanted. Do you care to refine your question, or do I have to operate in that ridiculously narrow paradigm you presented to me? Nothing is the answer, dummy.
We are making progress here. You are either saying (a) FBI/DNI/DHS are always bad, or you are saying (b) they simply should never stick their noses in these situations. More likely you are trying to say (b). But why b? Do you think crimes never occur on social media? Do you think Stewart Rhodes and his friends aren't criminals?
(12-10-2022, 04:07 PM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ] (12-10-2022, 02:43 PM)Lucky2Last Wrote: [ -> ]This is your problem: you have an ethical concept of heterosexuality, but you do not have a concept of homosexuality. Ok prove it. What could you do that you would enjoy homosexually, other than nothing.
I'm sure you can tell the above scenario is pretty slanted. Do you care to refine your question, or do I have to operate in that ridiculously narrow paradigm you presented to me? Nothing is the answer, dummy.
We are making progress here. You are either saying (a) FBI/DNI/DHS are always bad, or you are saying (b) they simply should never stick their noses in these situations. More likely you are trying to say (b). But why b? Do you think crimes never occur on social media? Do you think Stewart Rhodes and his friends aren't criminals?
I can only imagine your responses had a social media company protected Trump while smearing Biden in the exact same manor that has occurred here.
He just follows his marching orders.
Musk's version of "free speech" is apparently "any speech that I get paid for". I'm not sure if he understands the dysfunction with that line of thinking but I'm pretty sure many of the users there don't.
(12-10-2022, 06:07 PM)copycat Wrote: [ -> ] (12-10-2022, 04:07 PM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ]We are making progress here. You are either saying (a) FBI/DNI/DHS are always bad, or you are saying (b) they simply should never stick their noses in these situations. More likely you are trying to say (b). But why b? Do you think crimes never occur on social media? Do you think Stewart Rhodes and his friends aren't criminals?
I can only imagine your responses had a social media company protected Trump while smearing Biden in the exact same manor that has occurred here.
We could very well live in that universe, if there was any large social media company that wanted to go to bat for Trump. None did. Poor baby!
(12-10-2022, 07:12 PM)MarleyJag Wrote: [ -> ]Musk's version of "free speech" is apparently "any speech that I get paid for". I'm not sure if he understands the dysfunction with that line of thinking but I'm pretty sure many of the users there don't.
I respect you, MJ, I really do, but you sound butt hurt.
(12-10-2022, 07:18 PM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ] (12-10-2022, 06:07 PM)copycat Wrote: [ -> ]I can only imagine your responses had a social media company protected Trump while smearing Biden in the exact same manor that has occurred here.
We could very well live in that universe, if there was any large social media company that wanted to go to bat for Trump. None did. Poor baby!
For being the smartest person on this forum you really are a tool.
(12-10-2022, 07:50 PM)copycat Wrote: [ -> ] (12-10-2022, 07:18 PM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ]We could very well live in that universe, if there was any large social media company that wanted to go to bat for Trump. None did. Poor baby!
For being the smartest person on this forum you really are a tool.
Aww, you're a pretty smart tool too!
(12-10-2022, 09:01 PM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ] (12-10-2022, 07:50 PM)copycat Wrote: [ -> ]For being the smartest person on this forum you really are a tool.
Aww, you're a pretty smart tool too!
Naw, I’m just a simpleton that disagrees with the MSM narrative.
(12-10-2022, 09:06 PM)copycat Wrote: [ -> ] (12-10-2022, 09:01 PM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ]Aww, you're a pretty smart tool too!
Naw, I’m just a simpleton that disagrees with the MSM narrative.
He's not the former but certainly the latter.
(12-16-2022, 05:28 PM)WingerDinger Wrote: [ -> ]https://twitter.com/NEWSMAX/status/16038...EbhWQ&s=19
More proof that The Government was telling Twitter, who to ban and supress..
47 seconds and not a single mention of that being stated. Twitter is a great place for the FBI to be in communication with. I mean, just imagine if 2000 idiots were planning a riot at the capitol. There would be a good chance a part of the organization of that event would take place on twitter.
(12-10-2022, 07:41 PM)homebiscuit Wrote: [ -> ] (12-10-2022, 07:12 PM)MarleyJag Wrote: [ -> ]Musk's version of "free speech" is apparently "any speech that I get paid for". I'm not sure if he understands the dysfunction with that line of thinking but I'm pretty sure many of the users there don't.
I respect you, MJ, I really do, but you sound butt hurt.
No, I'm completely OK with capitalism. Imma be a little sarcastic when it comes to hypocrisy though.
B--b-but.... but... but... don't you believe in the freedom of companies to choose?