Quote:Watkins or Mack even Matthews
So you would have taken a WR at 3 in a draft LOADED at WR?!?
You would have taken Mack, who may or may not have been a scheme fit for us?!?
You would have taken basically a RT at 3 overall?
And you assail MY logic?!?
Quote:ok have at it. this is why every year Jags fans are done by the 10th pick because we accept this crap
Have at what? I am not spazzing because I accept the fact that I don't know how any of these players are going to pan out. I don't just presume that a player will be great or terrible.
Quote:So you would have taken a WR at 3 in a draft LOADED at WR?!?
You would have taken Mack, who may or may not have been a scheme fit for us?!?
You would have taken basically a RT at 3 overall?
And you assail MY logic?!?
All of them will be better than the clown we picked
Quote:So you would have taken a WR at 3 in a draft LOADED at WR?!?
You would have taken Mack, who may or may not have been a scheme fit for us?!?
You would have taken basically a RT at 3 overall?
And you assail MY logic?!?
Gonna need that RT when you take on JJ Watt and Clowney twice a year!
Quote:All of them will be better than the clown we picked
And you know this how, exactly?
Quote:All of them will be better than the clown we picked
Is this like when little kids don't get their way and decide they hate everything that isn't their choice?
Quote:All of them will be better than the clown we picked
I bet Rolando McLain and Aaron Curry felt that way too.
Quote:Saw him in college
Ok so college equals NFL? Tim Tebow should be a HOF if I'm using your logic.
Quote:And you know this how, exactly?
He can see into the future.
Quote:And you know this how, exactly?
Just like you knew Alualu and Gabbert were good
Quote:Gonna need that RT when you take on JJ Watt and Clowney twice a year!
1. Watt often rushes against guards.
2. A RT may or may not be able to match up speed wise against Clowney.
Quote:The trade with Buffalo.
Maybe we still get Bortles at #9. Maybe we're 'stuck' with a good pass rusher like Barr or Donald. In either case we'd have another 1st round pick next year.
Rumor is CLE only traded out because Bortles was picked.
Quote:Just like you knew Alualu and Gabbert were good
Uhh...no.
I hated the Alualu pick.
I was wrong on Gabbert.
Newsflash: EVEN THE BEST NFL GMs miss. Ozzie Newsome missed on Kyle Boller.
Every GM missed on Russell Wilson at least twice, and Brady at least 5 times.
Quote:1. Watt often rushes against guards.
2. A RT may or may not be able to match up speed wise against Clowney.
And as a DE he will also be lined up against a tackle as well. Regarding Clowney, thats why you need an elite RT, or a decent RT and a good blocking TE. We still may have one of those in Marcedes hopefully this year.
Quote:Which ones have worked???
Jesus dude... we had a promising draft last year along with a free agency where we found some solid contributors without wild spending. It seems that we had yet another solid free agency without wild spending. Jury still out, obviously(see previous post about patience) but from all early indications looks good.
And I'd love to spend the rest of the night in a [BAD WORD REMOVED] contest with you but I just remembered why I rarely come back to this board.
Quote:All of them will be better than the clown we picked
Clearly, clowns are in your wheelhouse.
Quote:So what? The trade would have been with Buffalo.
And Buffalo was never going to trade with the Jags.
They were waiting to see if the Jags took the guy they wanted (Watkins). If they did, no trading up. If they didn't, then try to trade up to a range where it's reasonable.
The m in mtown must stand for moron.